Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Good post, Scoop.
I think we're all getting the same feedback, so we know what they're going after, both the NC and the company. We can judge the results when/if there is a T/A.
I do want to make one observation, and I think it's an important concept. Let me see if I can develop it like this:
1) It's not just important what we say on the forum, but what we do.
2) We step up to say we'll vote down a contract that's not satisfactory, and this is good. But we're also tripping over ourselves over rumors, and showing eagerness for a T/A. APC right now is just humming along, powered by eager Delta pilots. That sends a message too.
3) Many of us, including me, are now showing a willingness to look at the T/A, with Section 1 taken in it's entirety. This opens the door for a deal further. Maybe they're now negotiating over a couple of jets here and there, or a % of pay, or an hour of vacation... you get my drift: maybe the whole thing is down to going a little this way, or a little that way.
4) [B]The more anxious we act (not talk), the less management feels they have to yield to get us there, the less leverage our guys have to go just a little further.
5) The more patient we act (not talk), the more management feels they have to give to get us there, the more leverage our guys have to go just a little further.
So think about this, as we perhaps approach the finish line (I'm not playing coy here.... I don't know either):
Patience and discipline might get us more. Patience and discipline might yield 1% extra, might yield 25 less 76-seat jets, might yield a better sick policy... whatever. And that little bit of patience now will pay back dividends every year.
At this point, your target audience is no longer other pilots. We don't have to convince each other of how to vote on a T/A yet, and to influence a T/A, we should be talking to our reps, not just this APC closed loop. This is mostly about showing discipline, as the NC determines whether they can wrap this up properly, or not. This is the time to provide them with just a little extra leverage, IMO.
I'm for one am going to try to put my words where my mouth is, and step back. I'm not a patient man at heart, but I can learn if there is a payoff.
I think we're all getting the same feedback, so we know what they're going after, both the NC and the company. We can judge the results when/if there is a T/A.
I do want to make one observation, and I think it's an important concept. Let me see if I can develop it like this:
1) It's not just important what we say on the forum, but what we do.
2) We step up to say we'll vote down a contract that's not satisfactory, and this is good. But we're also tripping over ourselves over rumors, and showing eagerness for a T/A. APC right now is just humming along, powered by eager Delta pilots. That sends a message too.
3) Many of us, including me, are now showing a willingness to look at the T/A, with Section 1 taken in it's entirety. This opens the door for a deal further. Maybe they're now negotiating over a couple of jets here and there, or a % of pay, or an hour of vacation... you get my drift: maybe the whole thing is down to going a little this way, or a little that way.
4) [B]The more anxious we act (not talk), the less management feels they have to yield to get us there, the less leverage our guys have to go just a little further.
5) The more patient we act (not talk), the more management feels they have to give to get us there, the more leverage our guys have to go just a little further.
So think about this, as we perhaps approach the finish line (I'm not playing coy here.... I don't know either):
Patience and discipline might get us more. Patience and discipline might yield 1% extra, might yield 25 less 76-seat jets, might yield a better sick policy... whatever. And that little bit of patience now will pay back dividends every year.
At this point, your target audience is no longer other pilots. We don't have to convince each other of how to vote on a T/A yet, and to influence a T/A, we should be talking to our reps, not just this APC closed loop. This is mostly about showing discipline, as the NC determines whether they can wrap this up properly, or not. This is the time to provide them with just a little extra leverage, IMO.
I'm for one am going to try to put my words where my mouth is, and step back. I'm not a patient man at heart, but I can learn if there is a payoff.
That is a good point.
Something I also get, and I am sure the company is getting off of these boards (which they read daily) is that guys are not going to accept something that they do not want. Scope, pay et al all has to be on a level at or above what a full section 6 would yield. That comes though. Even those of us that are willing to wait to see the TA and the actual language before grabbing a pitch fork, have the same mindset; "Give us what we deserve and don't play games." If that is in fact how this goes down, it will go quickly and quietly. If not,.......
*I see no pressure within the MEC or the pilot group as a whole to agree to substandard terms. I do see an eagerness to return to greatness, but not at an unacceptable cost.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Everyone needs to step back and take a breather. Managing the unknown can be tough, but posts detrimental to our cause undermines the negotiating capital of our team. Think about the rumors and the psy-ops management is trying to distract the pilots with... Stay strong, focused, committed and most importantly, patient. They came to us with an early opener, remember that.
Everyone needs to step back and take a breather. Managing the unknown can be tough, but posts detrimental to our cause undermines the negotiating capital of our team. Think about the rumors and the psy-ops management is trying to distract the pilots with... Stay strong, focused, committed and most importantly, patient. They came to us with an early opener, remember that.
Don't tell sailing that!
Hang tight boys.... We all arrived at our own decision matrix long ago. I'm sure each of us may have made minor adjustments, but overall nothing has really changed. Keep in touch with your Reps and don't get thrown about by the distractions. Aviate, Navigate, Communicate....
TC
TC
Hang tight boys.... We all arrived at our own decision matrix long ago. I'm sure each of us may have made minor adjustments, but overall nothing has really changed. Keep in touch with your Reps and don't get thrown about by the distractions. Aviate, Navigate, Communicate....
TC
TC
Agreed. The MEC is air tight, the rumors are from across the street. Trial balloons if you will.
I think one thing that has changed for me personally is I would like to see a 24-30 month contract. Gives everyone more time to see the weather on the horizon. Having said that, I still have a couple of definitive items that I require to vote yes.
ACL, hope to see you at the LEC mtg if you can make it.
TC
Assuming these rumors are more than fluff, one of the things that accompanies them is immediate hiring.
How do I set up the DAL internal recommendation email? a link would be fine.
Will it mess up my other passwords?
How do I set up the DAL internal recommendation email? a link would be fine.
Will it mess up my other passwords?
I had a need to access my company email a few months ago. It triggered the password reset. I've already had to change it again.
TC
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Under the ALPA playbook when the talking points from the LEC coalesce it means someone was willing to talk to a point of breaching a confidentiality agreement and they had to be reigned in by the lawyers. They were all told "say this, and only this". So for the sake of ease and expediency they say that and only that.
I do appreciate the pieces of intel, but we all have to realize that trial balloons are mixed in. I know which items will garner an immediate no vote from me, regardless of how many bows or how much fluffy language you put on it. At the same time, I know what will get my yes vote.
I think one thing that has changed for me personally is I would like to see a 24-30 month contract. Gives everyone more time to see the weather on the horizon. Having said that, I still have a couple of definitive items that I require to vote yes.
ACL, hope to see you at the LEC mtg if you can make it.
TC
I think one thing that has changed for me personally is I would like to see a 24-30 month contract. Gives everyone more time to see the weather on the horizon. Having said that, I still have a couple of definitive items that I require to vote yes.
ACL, hope to see you at the LEC mtg if you can make it.
TC
I probably have four or five left in me. Not quite 40, but I do agree with ya. There are no negotiable items. The rumors are great, but a filter is needed on some of them. I cannot tell you how many I have heard that I do not even bother posting or commenting on. That said, the strong negative reaction is good.
As for the LEC meeting, I will be there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




