Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2012, 05:48 PM
  #98011  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,953
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Just opened my e-mail.
I am stunned!! Appalled!! This Negotiator Notepad is unbelievable. I can't imagine why they would put this out.
Are we back in bankruptcy? This is all increases in pilot productivity with nothing good attached to it but trivialities.
We've just lost maybe what? a thousand pilots with this disaster. More?

Raise the ALV? Lose jobs. Make July and August into 30 day months to pack that ALV into? Lose jobs. Bump the reserves to ALV+15? Lose jobs. Let reserves sell their X days for more guarantee? Lose jobs.
This is freaking horrible! If this stuff makes it into the contract we will not see another positive AE for a long long time. The 100 hour month *****s among us will love this contract. Makes up for the loss of trip parking and then some.

I will repeat -- I am stunned!
What the hell is Scrappy thinking putting this out? Could it be a cry for help? Is he warning us that things are going badly? The good things in it are trivial and infrequent. We can now call in sick for a toothache? Yippee!!

I suppose I will eat my words if there is a 50% pay raise attached but for now --- WOW. We are getting our butts kicked.

There better be some VERY serious coins coming along with all these work rule concessions.

Somebody tell me why I shouldn't panic. Please.
Did I read this wrong? Its all concessions to my mind. That can't be right.
When people filled out the survey was "work longer hours" the number 1 vote getter??
I'm just shocked at this. Sorry. Time for some single malt.
I agree. This is not good. I like the idea of adding an extra x-day, but then I read that I will only get 12 x-days in June, July, and August. Right now I get 13 days in July. I'm not sure how this is better. It is obvious that the company has no intention to furlough as it knows we will be short pilots in about 5 years. We will not be hiring nearly as many pilots as retire. This is what I see. The company wants as many 76-seaters as we will allow and wants the pilots on property to fly FAR limits. I need to send more negativity to my rep. Hopefully others are doing the same.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 05:50 PM
  #98012  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067
How many less pilots will we need by increasing the ALV and by increasing the reserve limit fro ALV to ALV + 15?

Here's some 'simple math':

ALV of 82, vs. ALV (82) + 15 = 18% less reserves required, but I didn't read it that way, I read it that you are still 'full' when you reach ALV, UNLESS you WANT to fly up to ALV + 15....?

And here's the math on the regular lines going up by 5 more hours.

ALV 82 (yearly average) + 5 hours = 6% less pilots required.

For every 1000 Captains, that's 60 less they need, so if there are 6,000 Captains today (?) that's 360 less they need tomorrow.

And that's only the regular lines, subtract more Capt. seats for the reserves who fly up to ALV+15.

You just paid for your "Raise"....again.
Timbo is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 05:51 PM
  #98013  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Shot off an email to my reps and got a prompt reply...... If it's an(y) consolation my reps have many of the same concerns we are mentioning. I was glad to hear this and I am looking forward to speaking with them personally once stateside.
I hope the reps get a handle on this real quick. They might need to shut this process down before we "expedite" ourselves into a huge disaster.
The negotiators appear to be operating in some other universe.

Why on Earth would we be giving major concessions to our work rules?
Check Essential is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 05:56 PM
  #98014  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 136
Default

Not hiring. Delta management says no pilot hiring in 2012 due to block hour decrease.

Anybody mind explaining this id appreciate it.
hickspilot is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:00 PM
  #98015  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
How about something requiring the company to oppose cabotage, too?

My God, that was a nauseating read. CREDITING 99 hours is one thing. FLYING 99 hours? Good thing 75% sick leave is gone. Guys will be calling in sick monthly.

NO NO NO NO NO. I don't even need to see section one to send this one back. If this was DALPA's attempt to get us pumped up and happy...FAIL.
Wait to see what the min day is negotiated. Would you change your mind if reserves and line holders both got a 6 hour min day even for deadhead? You would fill up rather quickly.
DLpilot is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:02 PM
  #98016  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Here's some 'simple math':

ALV of 82, vs. ALV (82) + 15 = 18% less reserves required, but I didn't read it that way, I read it that you are still 'full' when you reach ALV, UNLESS you WANT to fly up to ALV + 15....?
Tim-
We're talking about Section 23.S.2.a.1 --
A reserve pilot will not be assigned a rotation that will cause his credit to exceed the ALV.

If they change that to ALV + 15 then they can assign a reserve a 15 hour trip if he is one minute short of the ALV. That is a big change. It will reduce staffing significantly.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:05 PM
  #98017  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Tim-
We're talking about Section 23.S.2.a.1 --
A reserve pilot will not be assigned a rotation that will cause his credit to exceed the ALV.

If they change that to ALV + 15 then they can assign a reserve a 15 hour trip if he is one minute short of the ALV. That is a big change. It will reduce staffing significantly.
I disagree. It states:

"Max reserve changed from ALV to ALV + 15:00
§ Reserve “full” at his reserve guarantee"



Meaning you're done at guarantee unless you want to go higher. AMIRITE?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:12 PM
  #98018  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: A330 Capt
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Here's some 'simple math':

And here's the math on the regular lines going up by 5 more hours.

ALV 82 (yearly average) + 5 hours = 6% less pilots required.

For every 1000 Captains, that's 60 less they need, so if there are 6,000 Captains today (?) that's 360 less they need tomorrow.
Timbo-

While I certainly agree that this reduces the staffing requirement, the current agreement has a TLV of 74-79 hours. If the TLV range is increased (per the NN) to 75-80 hours, this is only a 1 hour increase at the top of the range. I believe that would be a decrease of a little over 1%, not 6%, if they ran right at the top of the TLV range.

dl
dl_1011 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:14 PM
  #98019  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,930
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I disagree. It states:

"Max reserve changed from ALV to ALV + 15:00
§ Reserve “full” at his reserve guarantee"



Meaning you're done at guarantee unless you want to go higher. AMIRITE?

Clamp,

Thats the way I read it - you are "full" at the guarantee but can fly more if you want. That in itself is not too bad, what I am worried about is being 2 hours short of the ALV and being assigned a 15 hour trip - would this be a proffer, an assignment or does the guy have no choice? If you have no choice being full is kind of meaningless. We really need some more explanation.

I think guys are getting a little ahead of ourselves - this is only part of the package and cannot be evaluated until we see the whole package.

In general I am pretty much against any productivity increases and don't want guys flying 90-100 hours. At least we got rid of trip parking. I will also say, I would like to see some analysis on these productivity increases (concessions) and the NC's take on them.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:16 PM
  #98020  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

I'm not seeing why there's so much negativity on the TA'd sections. A 1 hour increase to ALV and TLV is marginal.

Increase rsv guarantee, good stuff. There's more ability to ***** yourself out on rsv, but not stuff they can do to you.

Biggie: Trip parking is DONE. That is huge.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices