Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

notEnuf 07-05-2015 08:33 AM

Some Sunday morning reading while I dig into the SEC filings.

How Delta Air Lines Sticks Out From The Airline Industry - Delta Air Lines, Inc. (NYSE:DAL) | Seeking Alpha

GOL could be the next Virgin Atlantic by years end.

GOL Linhas Areas Inteligentes S.A. (GOL) - NYSE

$2.20 -0.08 (-3.51%)

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3302...the-real?ifp=0

Scottyr6 07-06-2015 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by ghilis101 (Post 1922319)
work rules. Work rules make us money. Company wants staffing efficiency, that significantly cuts into our pay. Its a wash if not cost saving for the company. Our PWA protections allow us to make far more money than whats gonna happen when this TA ties our hands (reference my example in another post of the harm done to us when one pilot is bumped down to reserve - just 1 pilot!).

If the world implodes next week, youre taking a pay cut anyway "to save the company" like you did 2x before. Hows that for the gorllia/elephant in the room. The argument that our pay rates are more protected than our PS hasn't held water ever, but one thing is for sure, when you give away work rules you never get them back. stop the bleeding. please please please stop the bleeding.



100% correct. Hopefully you're a fairly young newer hire. We need that kind of thinking. This profession is being destroyed and it's only our fault. I'm worried for my next 20 years of this job. When I ask the "older" guys I fly with if their kids are or are going to be pilots and they say "oh god no. This job isn't what it used to be". And they still vote for these contracts I get so confused. We fly till 65 now longer harder days with continued decrease in work rules for less money than a decade plus ago...if you were management wouldn't you keep going with short term contracts? If this passes there has to be a bunch in the company looking at each other saying "holy s*£%...seriously again?"

Purple Drank 07-06-2015 09:25 AM

Just got the chairman's newest letter.

Pure desperation.

I'm not sure how he can be so out-of-touch with the devastating concessions in this POS.

BenderRodriguez 07-06-2015 04:04 PM


Originally Posted by tom14cat14 (Post 1922149)
Does anyone know pre 9/11 did all contracts have concessions? I am just wondering if we now suffer from Stockholm syndrome with regards that we figure we have to give something up in order to get anything. Has it always been you have to take concessions to get pay raise or is this what we just assume the new norm is?

Do you seriously believe that we, or any labor group will ever get everything and give nothing? Call it concession if you want, but that is an emotional word that has certain connotations. Compromise is perhaps less so, and certainly means something of the same thing, but if you are going to vote no for anything that you see as a compromise/concession then you will be better off not to even read any TA and just vote no. Save yourself the angst and heart stress.

BenderRodriguez 07-06-2015 04:05 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 1922195)
You may be correct but these concessions and these pay rates are unacceptable. If we got a real 6% raise and a 6% conversion on profit sharing on 1/1/2016, then I think this would pass easily even with the concessions. I personally would still be a no because I think QOL gains need to be defended.

Do you think we will do better on a new one, and how much better will we do? On what are you basing that opinion?

BenderRodriguez 07-06-2015 04:06 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1923141)
Just got the chairman's newest letter.

Pure desperation.

I'm not sure how he can be so out-of-touch with the devastating concessions in this POS.

devastating? Seriously?

ghilis101 07-06-2015 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1923364)
Do you seriously believe that we, or any labor group will ever get everything and give nothing? Call it concession if you want, but that is an emotional word that has certain connotations. Compromise is perhaps less so, and certainly means something of the same thing, but if you are going to vote no for anything that you see as a compromise/concession then you will be better off not to even read any TA and just vote no. Save yourself the angst and heart stress.

Bender we are highly skilled, highly specialized trade union workers. There is no cardinal rule out there that says every time you negotiate a pay raise you have to give something up. Your typical office worker gets a pay raise, but doesn't have to haggle with their boss in terms of lets say, having to work more hours, give up vacation or sick time, etc cwithout the ability to do something about it. They just get a pay raise. If the company starts pulling some of their benefits (since they are non union), they leave the company for a better company with better pay and benefits.

We, as you know, can't do that without starting at the bottom somewhere else. This is why we are so heavily vested in our job protections. Our scope. Our work rules. Our sick and health care. Our vacation. Our hours of service. It all matters more than just the pay raise itself.

If they offered us a contract extension with cost of living and inflation adjustments, it would be a drop in the bucket to the company. And even then, a contract extension isn't even a great thing considering were ALREADY operating under a CONCESSIONARY CONTRACT. But sadly that would be better than what were being offered right now.

Flamer 07-06-2015 04:50 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1923369)
devastating? Seriously?

Considering the economic environment it is the most appropriate word that won't result in being banned for a bit.

BenderRodriguez 07-06-2015 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by Flamer (Post 1923397)
Considering the economic environment it is the most appropriate word that won't result in being banned for a bit.

No, Living in San Francisco and having your daughter murdered by someone that should have been in prison is devastating. This is a mere inconvenience. Regardless how this comes out, we are still in the top 5% or so of all wage earners in the country, and in the top 1% of the entire planet.

Phuz 07-06-2015 05:36 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1923411)
No, Living in San Francisco and having your daughter murdered by someone that should have been in prison is devastating. This is a mere inconvenience. Regardless how this comes out, we are still in the top 5% or so of all wage earners in the country, and in the top 1% of the entire planet.

You're right on all counts. Of course I couldn't live in SFO without being in the top 5%.. but nevermind that.

Let's all just be content with our lot in life because hey we are 1%'ers after all.. Just like Richard.

I don't know about you Bender but I like nice things, and somehow or another I am always trying to improve my lot in life. Concessions of any sort do not make sense right now; save that for the next major downturn.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands