Details on Delta TA
05-12-2015 | 12:06 PM
#4191
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Carl
05-12-2015 | 01:14 PM
#4192
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Not too lazy, too disingenuous. C2012 had a number of pro-company items implement immediately and pro-pilot items delayed for months. The main reason I remember was "computer programming issues." Reality is that it was just more self-funding to make C2012 cost neutral.
Carl
Carl
What you call reality is just opinion unless you can show examples of how the company benefitted early while we had to wait for ours. I've already given a few examples from the implementation schedule a few posts back.
Yes, some items were not implemented immediately. That happens on both sides of the table for a variety of reasons.
05-12-2015 | 02:42 PM
#4194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
While its easy to point to single examples either way, the trends do seem to support company relief first while waiting a bit to get our end of things more often than not.
I love the "computer programming" excuse though. Have we ever had to delay implementation of agreed upon concessions because they needed time to write code?
05-12-2015 | 06:04 PM
#4198
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
I don't have the C2012 implementation schedule anymore, but maybe someone that still has it can post it. If you want to say that there weren't examples of pro-company things happening immediately and pro-pilot things taking months to "implement", knock yourself out.
See above.
Then why did you ask for examples earlier when you already knew it happened exactly as I said it did?
Carl
Carl
05-12-2015 | 06:26 PM
#4200
ready for mo money
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Left Behind
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
