Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 05-20-2015 | 05:30 AM
  #4411  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We have probably already done the equivalent of two years negotiations at the normal pace.
Assuming you are correct about this (a huge stretch), why are we allowing the company to set the timetable?

Why Is dalpa in such a rush? You can be darn sure the company would drag its feet if that would help it gain leverage.
Remember what a shoddy product C12 was after being so rushed. Why would we want to repeat that?
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 05:38 AM
  #4412  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Assuming you are correct about this (a huge stretch), why are we allowing the company to set the timetable?

Why Is dalpa in such a rush? You can be darn sure the company would drag its feet if that would help it gain leverage.
Remember what a shoddy product C12 was after being so rushed. Why would we want to repeat that?
We should delay getting a better contract as long as possible. We should stand up to the company and tell them we are meeting no more then once a month. If SW can drag out negotiations for 3 years by God we are going to take 4!
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 06:12 AM
  #4413  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: number cruncher
Default

Silly people and fear of seemingly small numbers.... 9% upon ratification and 9% on Jan.1 is an 18.81% increase on the amendable date; about 1/2 point ahead of C2K 2004 rates! Hooray, it only took 12 years. Profit sharing would not change for 2015 (like last time) so that adds another 19-20% on top of 2015 earnings, don't you just love the frosting on that cake!

Since we all love to speculate here, let's go with the PS plan changes on the bottom to move 5% over to the rates, (9/9/4/4 is actually 9/4/4/4). Therefore in 2016 you are being paid more than 2004 rates, and even though you lopped 5% off of the PS calculation, the projected payout (using the 2015 estimate), would still add roughly 14-16% onto that amount come February.Looks like quite close to C2K plus inflation.(and way ahead of the previous peak for PMNW pilots). Yes I think we would see C2K+14.5% at least for the 2016 year.


Given a status quo in the rest of the contract it's a no brainer. The interesting parts will be in other than Section 3, will we gain or lose? We've seen giveaways and gains in all different areas. Quantifying that will be the part that needs the most scrutiny.
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 06:17 AM
  #4414  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Our executives ignored their expert Captain Steve Dickson and their own staffing experts on the non pilot side of the house when they told them to begin hiring.

Was it by design?

Some of the kool aid club would try to tell you concessions are necessary. That is simply not true. IMO Delta will make $6 billion this year and $10 billion in 2016 and beyond. Why would we consider permanent concessions??

If our leaders choose to help management out of a temporary jam it should be with short term help in exchange for premium pay and a hundred captain upgrades per month of relief.

We have given enough concessions to last a lifetime.

Jerry

NOT ONE PERMANENT CONCESSION!!!!
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 06:19 AM
  #4415  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotstats
Silly people and fear of seemingly small numbers.... 9% upon ratification and 9% on Jan.1 is an 18.81% increase on the amendable date; about 1/2 point ahead of C2K 2004 rates! Hooray, it only took 12 years. Profit sharing would not change for 2015 (like last time) so that adds another 19-20% on top of 2015 earnings, don't you just love the frosting on that cake!

Since we all love to speculate here, let's go with the PS plan changes on the bottom to move 5% over to the rates, (9/9/4/4 is actually 9/4/4/4). Therefore in 2016 you are being paid more than 2004 rates, and even though you lopped 5% off of the PS calculation, the projected payout (using the 2015 estimate), would still add roughly 14-16% onto that amount come February.Looks like quite close to C2K plus inflation.(and way ahead of the previous peak for PMNW pilots). Yes I think we would see C2K+14.5% at least for the 2016 year.


Given a status quo in the rest of the contract it's a no brainer. The interesting parts will be in other than Section 3, will we gain or lose? We've seen giveaways and gains in all different areas. Quantifying that will be the part that needs the most scrutiny.
A seemingly confusing, obfuscate post.

You've cleverly clouded and mislead with your PS payout comment. You note that "PS would not change in 2015 just like last time", well PS never did change in the first year of the TA. PS did change, however for the next three years.

Not sure why your trying to rationalize rumor and innuendo. Especially when we have barely even discussed compensation with the company.

Nice first post....

Last edited by DeadHead; 05-20-2015 at 06:56 AM.
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 06:19 AM
  #4416  
bohicagain's Avatar
looking for underboob
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 914
Likes: 4
From: NYC 7ER LCA
Default

Originally Posted by pilotstats
Silly people and fear of seemingly small numbers.... 9% upon ratification and 9% on Jan.1 is an 18.81% increase on the amendable date; about 1/2 point ahead of C2K 2004 rates! Hooray, it only took 12 years. Profit sharing would not change for 2015 (like last time) so that adds another 19-20% on top of 2015 earnings, don't you just love the frosting on that cake!

Since we all love to speculate here, let's go with the PS plan changes on the bottom to move 5% over to the rates, (9/9/4/4 is actually 9/4/4/4). Therefore in 2016 you are being paid more than 2004 rates, and even though you lopped 5% off of the PS calculation, the projected payout (using the 2015 estimate), would still add roughly 14-16% onto that amount come February.Looks like quite close to C2K plus inflation.(and way ahead of the previous peak for PMNW pilots). Yes I think we would see C2K+14.5% at least for the 2016 year.


Given a status quo in the rest of the contract it's a no brainer. The interesting parts will be in other than Section 3, will we gain or lose? We've seen giveaways and gains in all different areas. Quantifying that will be the part that needs the most scrutiny.

Why do we need to give anything away?

During bankruptcy when Delta guys took 46% pay cuts what did the pilots get in those negotiations for helping the company out? What was Delta's giveaway then? Was it PS?
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 06:27 AM
  #4417  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Our execs have dug themselves a hole and they want us to save them. They are plenty smart enough to fix things without our concessions.

We need to slow down for the promised historic C2015. Not a penny less.
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 07:29 AM
  #4418  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We should delay getting a better contract as long as possible. We should stand up to the company and tell them we are meeting no more then once a month. If SW can drag out negotiations for 3 years by God we are going to take 4!
Exactly. Unless you are sure there is something super time critical that gives us some finite leverage (I am not aware of anything) why would you delay? They key is that you don't want to TA something just because it is fast.

Again, tell me exactly what the reason is for dragging out negotiations and what leverage would be gained?
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 07:45 AM
  #4419  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Is it me or are there a lot of new posters encouraging a fast sign....
Reply
Old 05-20-2015 | 07:49 AM
  #4420  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

What is the point of coming back on here to post and changing your name? That right there tells you they are dishonest and dishonorable.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices