Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2015 | 10:41 AM
  #5081  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The E-195 is already a mainline only airplane. Nothing needs to be given up to get them, and the company doesn't need a trick way out of dumb Mullin/Reid RJ leases to figure out how to afford to get into them. EMB would bend over backwards to get a DAL order.
Except.... if you guys allow us to reduce DCI 450 to $39.99.... I mean 395, as in a max of 395 jets, but you let those be all premium cabin mobile profitability center jumbo RJs, then we'll buy you EMB-190s.

That's a win win win. Remember from 2012? Fewer DCI jets. Fewer CR2s. More profitable upgauging jumbo RJs which means more profit sharing for us. You and I Gloop get our new Captain's seats (nevermind that you and I can hold M88A and 717A now).

It's a win win win for us, no brainer. Also, we keep them from doing what they wanted to do which was buy 500 Dash 8-400Qs. They were asking for an exemption and we said no.

So 70 more CRJ-900s, total 395 jumbo RJs, no CR2s, more profit, new E190s for mainline. And you and I can be Captains and as we taxi out to the runway and I realize you're behind me, I'm going to call tower using your call sign and tell them we're ready to go.



Sent using Tapatalk from my parents basement in Amarillo.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 11:02 AM
  #5082  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Except.... if you guys allow us to reduce DCI 450 to $39.99.... I mean 395, as in a max of 395 jets, but you let those be all premium cabin profitability center jumbo RJs, then we'll buy you EMB-190s.

That's a win win win. Remember? DCI wins more large RJs and they'll get rid of the CR2s, no more CR2s. New E190s =we get our new Captains seats Gloop, nevermind we can hold MD-88/90A and 717A now. AND fewer RJs = scope win. And the company upgauges which = more profit.

It's a win win win for us.

Also, we keep them from doing what they wanted to do which was buy 500 Dash 8-400Qs. They were asking for an exemption and we said no.





Sent using Tapatalk from my parents basement in Amarillo.
Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:29 PM
  #5083  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by EdGrimley
Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

Is he still allowed to call himself Captain? What is he a Captain of these days?
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:37 PM
  #5084  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
Is he still allowed to call himself Captain? What is he a Captain of these days?
You know how it is.....you spend your whole career fighting management, and I mean really sticking it to them for the pilots you represent....then when you retire, management funnels you millions for your efforts.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:50 PM
  #5085  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

scrolling...
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:50 PM
  #5086  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

still scrolling...
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 01:48 PM
  #5087  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Not when it comes to the corruption of our governance Shiznit. That needs to turn outwards toward the members that can make the appropriate changes. .....This is exactly what's happening in our MEC administration. Our reps are letting us know. A very good thing.
Wrong, flat out wrong. They don't even admit as much in the op-ed. they use words like "for whatever reason" and "seems". No mention of any "corruption of governance" or like statements. There is a clear mechanism to remedy corruption, and there is a ethical and legal responsibility to take appropriate action to address such activity. Sending an op-ed that throws your NC and MEC under the bus doesn't fit that bill.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Showing a united face to management that we're happy with concessions does EVERYTHING to get us a PWA with concessions. That's the point shiznit.
Not at all, no one is happy with concessions. Undermining the negotiators doesn't help undo concessions.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
It is the ONLY thing that will get us more money and more time off. This is throwing a huge wrench into the gears of a union relationship that RA was certain he had in the bag. RA and Campbell are extremely unhappy about this.

This is the best possible thing for Delta pilots.

Carl
It's not the ONLY thing, and save the pilot anger for when it can be leveraged.. The AA pilots were disgruntled all the time and the media, stock market, their own management just ignored them because it was part of the everyday existence. The leverage that the Delta pilots get to exert is that Richard has said "labor risk is off the table", remember? The ability to promise labor risk is a tool for the MEC and NC to use, but they don't get multiple shots once unleashed. It's use should be strategically placed on the table when needed, not thrown around by some local council missive and flushed down the drain.

The timing of it definitely couldn't be worse, right before direct negotiations enter the compensation discussions. If the opposition (management) already knows you are against whatever the NC brings forward, why bother offering anything? When in a business deal, there has to be an expectation that a deal can be reached. Walking in and saying, "No, I won't agree to or listen to anything you say" is not rational or reasonable.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
With you shiznit, it's hard to know whether you really believe anything this naive or whether you're just carrying the water for the MEC administration...again.
Not naive, just willing to let the guys who helped pave the way for C2K do their thing now that it's their turn.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
There is absolutely zero chance that our negotiators are trying to go above our survey demands. None.
To use a "Carlism":

You have no way of knowing that. None. You're just a line pilot like the rest of us.

Oddly enough I agree and it applies to you too!
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Translation: Profit sharing is bad and risky. We need to give it up for higher pay rates.

Translation: Profit sharing is bad and Completely wrong. The worst thing we could possibly show is a unified face of willingness to accept whatever we're told to accept by our unelected bureaucrats. When we show the face of refusal like we're showing now, that disorients management. That concerns them because labor risk was supposed to be completely off the table.
You are so bad at translation Carl. You don't have that right with me.

I think we have an absolutely spectacularly successful PS plan. (hatched and negotiated by the oft reviled Moak, O'Malley, Pinho, etc.) All it shows is that "winding the clock" isn't as economically advantageous as it may seem on the surface.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Except I'm the one working hard to undermine that effort shiznit. I need to rethink what I'm doing here. Fast.

Carl
fyp
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 03:17 PM
  #5088  
Flamer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Default

Originally Posted by EdGrimley
Funny and sad at the same time. I'm having flashbacks to C2012. I know at least one guy that's not too effected by "mature pilot contracts". Give to the right people and you'll be famous and money won't be an issue.

If d-baggery were a word, it would be appropriate here.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 03:30 PM
  #5089  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit[/QUOTE
I think we have an absolutely spectacularly successful PS plan. (hatched and negotiated by the oft reviled Moak, O'Malley, Pinho, etc.) All it shows is that "winding the clock" isn't as economically advantageous as it may seem on the surface.
C'mon, man. Profit sharing was negotiated BEFORE C12. You know that. All O'Malley did was trade it away and disengenuously include it in our "raise."

Those other guys stumbled onto profit sharing. To think they foresaw the insane profits Delta is enjoying now, is complete bull****. No one saw these profits coming. Not anyone in management.. If they had anticipated profits like this ...they wouldn't have given it to us!!

Now that the Dalpa administrators realize how much profit sharing costs the company, they (and you) are pulling out all the stops to find some way to give it back to them. Why?
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 03:45 PM
  #5090  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Those other guys stumbled onto profit sharing. To think they foresaw the insane profits Delta is enjoying now, is complete bull****. No one saw these profits coming. Not anyone in management.. If they had anticipated profits like this ...they wouldn't have given it to us!!
Huh, scuse me!? The Delta pilots of that period read the 1113 documents, our amended contract, and our W-2's, and we knew there were billions there, since we were giving them those billions. There wasn't any question in anyone's mind that the company would be VERY profitable. The problem many of us had is that we didn't know how soon, and how much we would get back. The guys that engineered/negotiated the PS have a claim to the credit, they own it. We gave them hell over it, in fact.

Were you here when the PS was negotiated by them, and funded by me and a few thousand guys I know?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices