![]() |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1704579)
Rumor on the other forum that management wants concessions to keep the 747s flying.
Even if the rumor is inaccurate, it would be nice to see a memo from MD along those lines. Anything to show some fire in his belly and some wartime leadership potential. His carefully worded optimism for an "historic contract" (what exactly does that mean?) and his demands for unity...don't inspire much unity. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1704589)
Even if the rumor is inaccurate, it would be nice to see a memo from MD along those lines. Anything to show some fire in his belly and some wartime leadership potential. His carefully worded optimism for an "historic contract" (what exactly does that mean?) and his demands for unity...don't inspire much unity. Show us that DALPA actually has restoration as its objective and we will have more unity than they know what to do with. Plus, it would be a really good test to see just how legitimate this mutually respectful relationship is that we supposedly have with management. What are you afraid of, DALPA? Are you afraid that "proactive engagement" hasn't turned out to be what you thought it was? |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1704579)
Rumor on the other forum that management wants concessions to keep the 747s flying. Anyone heard anything about this?
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1704579)
Rumor on the other forum that management wants concessions to keep the 747s flying. Anyone heard anything about this?
So far, I'm only hearing it from you. |
Originally Posted by Starcheck102
(Post 1704654)
Didn't you start that rumor on the other forum?
So far, I'm only hearing it from you. Read it on the other forum. It is hard to believe management would try such a dusty old trick. Given their severe lack of scope compliance, the pilots are in no mood for yet more concessions. They choose the planes, we fly them. Our contract is not written in pencil. You never ever negotiate for planes. Ever. |
Sorry. I saw you started a thread on the other board with that title, but never saw anything else.
I am also opposed to "shiny objects syndrome." |
Originally Posted by Starcheck102
(Post 1704685)
Sorry. I saw you started a thread on the other board with that title, but never saw anything else.
I am also opposed to "shiny objects syndrome." Good to know!! |
Originally Posted by Starcheck102
(Post 1704654)
Didn't you start that rumor on the other forum?
So far, I'm only hearing it from you. lulz. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1704664)
No
Read it on the other forum. It is hard to believe management would try such a dusty old trick. Given their severe lack of scope compliance, the pilots are in no mood for yet more concessions. They choose the planes, we fly them. Our contract is not written in pencil. You never ever negotiate for planes. Ever. |
Open at 25%, then 5,5,5. For 40% over next 4 yrs.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands