Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1703492)

Well 62% of your pilot group disagrees with you. Of course I guess they were simply duped.

Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1703511)

Thanks for the emotional response, it really helps your case.

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1703521)

Yeah, if it doesn't agree with what you think then it MUST be emotional. :rolleyes: That trick is getting old, Shiz, and I don't think anyone who is objective is buying it.

Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1703570)

I keep forgetting that you are the objective one and those that don't agree with you are the emotional ones, thanks for the reminder.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1703502)

That's ridiculous. I've never heard a single no voter say that. Not one. Mostly the reasons I've heard are: Didn't meet the contract survey, didn't believe the MEC admin's fear campaign, thought the company would come back with more if we sent it back, and it was too little before Section 6 even began.



Just like last time and not including our foreign JV competitors.

Carl

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1703586)

http://i3.walesonline.co.uk/incoming...-149345872.jpg


Carl...

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1703573)

So in the world of tsquare, you're disqualified if you don't trust your reps? I think one of his reps is Nestor. How could anyone trust someone that blatantly political?
Carl

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1703548)

That's what the NC stated. That's not what my reps stated. That's the problem.

Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1703614)

The correct way to say this is that it didn't meet the responses that I put on MY survey. It didn't meet what I put on mine, and I will agree to that.

Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1703614)

If you expect them to get everything that you put on the survey, you are a fool.

Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1703614)

Or you just like being dishonest and divisive.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1703639)

I tried to read everything being put out by all councils during the ratification period. I saw nothing that said that the NC did not follow the priorities section of the survey. In fact, I saw no mention of survey priorities at all -- only that that TA did not meet the direction given by the MEC.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1703667)

No, that's what tsquare says is correct. My reps simply said it did not even come close to the survey results. Be nice if they'd release the results so we could see for ourselves wouldn't it. :rolleyes:



You're the only one saying that tsquare. Yet another straw man.



Hmmm, I'm either dishonest, divisive or a fool. You've always been such a persuasive debater tsquare.

Carl