|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 1895645)
Well, you must be proud to be called lazy by your peers. You volunteer in the CPO because you don't want to have to fly what you can hold...you do, though, want to get paid what you can hold while being home every night. So the CPO says " you know what, why don't you go on APC and keep the rumors in check and just act like you are smarter and more reasonable than everyone on there.
Score, right? Well. I volunteer for YOUR Union. Actually. So no. Not the CPO. And 2. Or D. If you have hang ups don't throw them on me, maaaan. Seriously. I'm just helping out. And this is on my own time. I have never and will never work in a CPO office. And unless someone begs me (will never happen) I'll never be an elected rep. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1895646)
Nope. Was before may or may not ever be again. If I am this won't effect me anyway. That's not relevant though. Covering that much real estate/traffic/expense is completely unreasonable even if the majority of the base wasn't commuters, which it is and always will be. JFK/LGA isn't nearly as bad but EWR should be either a separate domicile or just another overnighting city. Blending all 3 is a major long standing concession.
And I haven't been NYC based in awhile. LGA and JFK doable. EWR, 100 bucks and 2 hours to get to where your trips (really) start. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1895606)
Rumor. Unverified.
9-1-1-1. Then enhanced to 9-6-1-1 with PS give back. Personally, I'm not so sure about this. I find it hard to believe they'd stoop THAT low. Maybe floated to have anything better than this crap look like a win. |
"The worlds greatest airline contract"
Not my words. Use this as the standard from which to judge. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1895646)
Nope. Was before may or may not ever be again. If I am this won't effect me anyway. That's not relevant though. Covering that much real estate/traffic/expense is completely unreasonable even if the majority of the base wasn't commuters, which it is and always will be. JFK/LGA isn't nearly as bad but EWR should be either a separate domicile or just another overnighting city. Blending all 3 is a major long standing concession.
It's a pain. I agree. The categories I have been based on up there EWR was typically covered by the N. PA dudes. So it worked out. I really think a reasonable thing is to have ground trans paid for by the company. Which it kinda is. We have space a on the crew runner. Anyway. I agree EWR kinda isn't sorta all that really if you think about it hard and deeply all things considered very good. But the la airports are way way worse. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1895654)
"The worlds greatest airline contract"
Not my words. Use this as the standard from which to judge. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1895606)
Rumor. Unverified.
9-1-1-1. Then enhanced to 9-6-1-1 with PS give back. Personally, I'm not so sure about this. I find it hard to believe they'd stoop THAT low. Maybe floated to have anything better than this crap look like a win. |
I think the reps would want the details to "leak".
If the line pilots aren't allowed to provide input to our reps then the seven days are pretty much pointless. |
Must be a good TA for the company to want to get it done this early. Otherwise they could sit back and just save it. Time value of money and everything.
Hmmmmm...wonder why they wanted to get it done so early? If it's because they just care about us and want a cooperative environment then I guess we'll see a minimum of restoration on date of signing without having to pay for it with a cut to PS or scope cave. If we don't see that then I would hope the average DL pilot would be more than a bit suspicious as to their motivation. |
Im gonna have to use the time honored tradition of PATTERN BARGAINING and just use a simple formula:
1.2 billion profit = 4,8,3,3 4.5-6.0 billion profit = BETTER, BE, FLIPPING, BIG |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands