![]() |
I have stated many times RA is wildly successful because he states goals. He measures goals. He demands results.
We don't have stated goals. Measureable goals. Shared goals. And that is why we don't have a historic TA. That is why we met management's timeline just like C2012 and fell far short of what we deserve in this once in a lifetime opportunity. A small handful of insiders drove this package. They set goals and delivered us for less yet again. The sales machine has been working overtime. They have one last goal. To get 50% plus 1. |
This TA will all come down to 4 swing voters.
ATL FO David Nestor SEA Captain Jud Crand SEA FO Chris Gaddis Council 48 Training rep Sam Mason Make your voice heard. These four carry our profession in their hands. |
Originally Posted by pilotjockey
(Post 1895925)
what i heard while checking in this afternoon
7/3/3/3 2 more dc but taken from profit sharing loss of 40 hours of sick verification at 80 per year no more oe bumps no change to vacation or cq pay no per diem increase aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no Our vacation was at the top of the list. Even management agrees we are light years behind UAL, UPS, FedEx, Alaska, etc. No way even our weak links would agree to no increase. Per diem is also a no brainier for the insiders. 7/3/3/3 makes 8/6/3/3 seem like a win. This is a red herring expectation lowerer. ( not a word, I know) HISTORIC OR IT'S A NO |
DefCon 4. Immediately.
It's really fortunate our airplanes don't have ejection seats. |
Prediction:
Unanimous MEC will vote yes. 83% total pilots will vote. 59% Yes, 41% No |
It's impressive how jerry already has all the details. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1896110)
It's impressive how jerry already has all the details. :rolleyes:
Personally, I'll wait until I see the details but the reaction I see on here would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. Vote no just because. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1896112)
Isn't it though? What's just as amazing is how many on here have already declared this the biggest POS ever.
Personally, I'll wait until I see the details but the reaction I see on here would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. Vote no just because. |
80, check your PMs
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1896113)
Much better...ish. We'll see what comes out.
Yup. It very well might be the biggest POS ever, but then again it might not. I can wait to find out for myself. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands