Airline Pilot Central Forums - Details on Delta TA

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)

- Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)

- - Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

Come on leakers, start leaking.:D

When you say "9/3/3/3" are you referring to annual pay raises?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 1895624)

Come on leakers, start leaking.:D

LEC Reps have it for consideration. If they approve it it goes to MEMRAT. We all get to marinate in the unknown for a bit.

Have fun control freaks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 1895625)

When you say "9/3/3/3" are you referring to annual pay raises?

Sort of. Its a blended figure that includes raises as well as the monetization of concessions elsewhere rolled into the over all "raise".

Someone should rapidly make a chart that shows what kind of money we'd get with Delta making $5B, 6, 7, and up as a percentage of pay. Like 2014 $4.5B equated to 23% of one's income. I don't know the math or I'd do it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1895409)

Years ago we made numerous complaints about the requirements to get to EWR. The company agreed to quit building rotations out of EWR. This was followed almost immediately by massive complaints from pilots who wanted the EWR trips back. It's kind of like CDO's. You have a group of pilots who wanted them and when they made a appearance a big group wanted them killed. Pleasing pilots is probably harder then sending a manned mission to Mars!

I'm sure some ATL pilots would love BHM or CHA or GSP trips too. Some DTW pilots would love CLE trips. Some SEA pilots would love PDX trips.

That doesn't mean we should do it, and it certainly doesn't mean we should just put it all on the entire pilot group in those bases if we did. Line holders, reserves, locals, commuters, are all negatively effected by things like this except the very few that actually live in a position to benefit from it.

EWR is completely unrealistic unless they want it as a separate stand alone base. Transportation is a pittance to continue to tolerate the ridiculousness of that "co-terminal".

Gloopy you are NYC based?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor (Post 1895556)

Nope. And nope. I have no interest in elected office. I'm a volunteer. Those who know me would call me 'lazy'.

Well, you must be proud to be called lazy by your peers. You volunteer in the CPO because you don't want to have to fly what you can hold...you do, though, want to get paid what you can hold while being home every night. So the CPO says " you know what, why don't you go on APC and keep the rumors in check and just act like you are smarter and more reasonable than everyone on there.

Score, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor (Post 1895642)

Gloopy you are NYC based?

Nope. Was before may or may not ever be again. If I am this won't effect me anyway. That's not relevant though. Covering that much real estate/traffic/expense is completely unreasonable even if the majority of the base wasn't commuters, which it is and always will be. JFK/LGA isn't nearly as bad but EWR should be either a separate domicile or just another overnighting city. Blending all 3 is a major long standing concession.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheManager (Post 1895606)

Rumor. Unverified.

9-1-1-1.

Then enhanced to 9-6-1-1 with PS give back.

Personally, I'm not so sure about this. I find it hard to believe they'd stoop THAT low.

Maybe floated to have anything better than this crap look like a win.

You will never see the 1,1.

Couldn't resist.