Details on Delta TA
06-13-2015, 06:02 AM
#8321
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Originally Posted by Bananie
Maybe because since bankruptcy, my pay has gone up about $90,000 per year and this TA will add another $50,000 or so. Meanwhile, the rest of the industry is simply riding on our shoulders. That's reason number one.
Nonsense.
You salesmen want to pretend the profit sharing reduction is not happening.
06-13-2015, 06:05 AM
#8322
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Originally Posted by gopher3
But Jerry, how could that be....many of our leaders all graduated from the same highly esteemed institution. A highly respected institution with core values of "Integrity First, Service Before Self, and Excellence in All We Do."
Just to name a few....
MEC Chairman
Shadow MEC Chairman
Chairman of Negotiating Committee
SVP of Flight OPS
MEC treasurer
Several Yes voting Reps
Just to name a few....
MEC Chairman
Shadow MEC Chairman
Chairman of Negotiating Committee
SVP of Flight OPS
MEC treasurer
Several Yes voting Reps
06-13-2015, 06:07 AM
#8323
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 336
Originally Posted by gzsg
Show us how a single 8% hourly increase gets you $50,000.
Nonsense.
You salesmen want to pretend the profit sharing reduction is not happening.
Nonsense.
You salesmen want to pretend the profit sharing reduction is not happening.
06-13-2015, 06:12 AM
#8324
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
There's nothing to email your rep about anymore. All you can do now is vote no. I'm not sure where you are based, but I emailed all my base reps numerous times when the rumors started coming out. I am 100 percent against this **** contract. Every single one of my reps voted for it. My emails didn't change a thing. I already stopped doing the survey after C2012, now I'm done emailing my reps.
As usual, DALPA ignored the survey completely did they're own thing. As usual, the company is trying to hold small airplanes over our head to get a forced yes. This thing will pass as usual. Disgusting really.
As usual, DALPA ignored the survey completely did they're own thing. As usual, the company is trying to hold small airplanes over our head to get a forced yes. This thing will pass as usual. Disgusting really.
I did the survey this time around. What a waste of my time.
06-13-2015, 06:14 AM
#8326
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Originally Posted by Professor
The block hour conversion is also up gauging protection. Because all of our WB deliveries both real and notional are larger than the 767, EASK balance doesn’t help us keep jobs. As we up gauge the 767s on the JV routes, we add seats and keep 3/person crews. Keep in mind as well that using pilot block hours would hurt us because of the crew imbalances amongst the JV partners, as previously mentioned.
06-13-2015, 06:17 AM
#8329
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Originally Posted by flyallnite
What about the Alter Ego provisions in Section one? Why did we agree that one human being, in this case Mike Donatelli, gets to approve the creation of 'Delta China' and 'Delta Atlantic' to fly Delta branded metal on Delta routes and Delta tickets, the profit going to Delta, and NO DELTA PILOTS at the controls!!! This is historic to be sure! As in our jobs are HISTORY!
I don't care what the explanation is, this negates our top end scope...completely.
Completely!
06-13-2015, 06:22 AM
#8330
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,524
Originally Posted by ERflyer
Professor,
Could you explain this one when you get a chance?
1.E.9.
The Delta MEC Chairman may, at his option, approve the use by a carrier engaged in international partner flying of a trade name, brand, logo, trademarks, service marks, aircraft livery or aircraft paint scheme currently or in the future utilized by the Company or any Company affiliate.
Where did that come from? And why?
Could you explain this one when you get a chance?
1.E.9.
The Delta MEC Chairman may, at his option, approve the use by a carrier engaged in international partner flying of a trade name, brand, logo, trademarks, service marks, aircraft livery or aircraft paint scheme currently or in the future utilized by the Company or any Company affiliate.
Where did that come from? And why?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
