Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1914179)

At that point they would not build rotations like that. Rotations are built to the work rules. Trying to build work rules to the rotations is a exercise in futility.

Originally Posted by Gunfighter (Post 1914175)

Or you would see new rotations built the month it goes in to effect that are 6 hours block, 4:45 block, 5 block for 15:45 pay. The rotations will change based on the rules in place at the time they are built. Remember the changes that happened when FAR 117 went into effect? I would expect any amount of daily guarantee to also have an impact.

I kind of like the trips with 7 hours block day 1, long layover on day 2 and 7 hours on day 3. They are especially nice when they are hometown layovers. A daily guarantee would make them all but disappear.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1914107)

That's true.

Makes me want to ask a question, is this the last time we are going to increase how many 76 seaters can be outsourced?

Just to get it on record.

Originally Posted by qball (Post 1914102)

Make night just like day for professional desk drivers. Gotta keep that night currency.

Originally Posted by nohat (Post 1914258)

With virtual basing there will be no hometown layovers, but a lot of one day trips:eek:

Originally Posted by tomgoodman (Post 1914313)

For us non-carrier pilots, I thought you were supposed to look only at the "ball", not the deck, so how would a full moon help? :confused:

Originally Posted by texavia (Post 1914099)

What perzactly "Field Grade Moon" mean?

Originally Posted by TED74 (Post 1914348)

Some questions for those in the know:

How is it even possible that Seattle is not a hub in this TA?

Should I have a reason as a pilot to be in favor of the current non-hub "arrangement" there?

If this TA passes, should I expect Delta to start collecting mandatory dues?