![]() |
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1913892)
We all know guys like this. For some reason, they don't like to fly. Or, they are afraid to fly. They gravitate to either office duties or union work where flying is rarely required. The term "Field Grade Moon" is as old as aviation.
|
Originally Posted by texavia
(Post 1914099)
What perzactly "Field Grade Moon" mean?
|
Originally Posted by qball
(Post 1914083)
Let's look at the bright side. If this POS gets passed, the next TA DALPA comes up with will probably make this one look like the gold standard.
Makes me want to ask a question, is this the last time we are going to increase how many 76 seaters can be outsourced? Just to get it on record. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1914107)
That's true.
Makes me want to ask a question, is this the last time we are going to increase how many 76 seaters can be outsourced? Just to get it on record. one of the worst things about this contract is it only last three years. I am in no mood to give more of our contract away in 2 yrs 6 months... |
I was really hoping we would get a 5:15 calendar day pay for all those 30 day layover 3 days where you fly 8 hrs day one and 7:45 on day 3..that's what the previous poster is talking about. then we'd be getting over 20 hours pay
|
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1914087)
Say you have a 3 day as follows:
8 hours block 0 hours block 6 hours block You get 15:45 pay If we had 4:45 min day you'd see 8 + 4:45 + 6 = 18:45 I kind of like the trips with 7 hours block day 1, long layover on day 2 and 7 hours on day 3. They are especially nice when they are hometown layovers. A daily guarantee would make them all but disappear. |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 1914175)
Or you would see new rotations built the month it goes in to effect that are 6 hours block, 4:45 block, 5 block for 15:45 pay.
Actually I think the pay would be higher in this example. 6+5:15+5:15=16:30 |
Originally Posted by MrBojangles
(Post 1914152)
I was really hoping we would get a 5:15 calendar day pay for all those 30 day layover 3 days where you fly 8 hrs day one and 7:45 on day 3..that's what the previous poster is talking about. then we'd be getting over 20 hours pay
|
Originally Posted by pilotc90a
(Post 1914136)
one of the worst things about this contract is it only last three years. I am in no mood to give more of our contract away in 2 yrs 6 months... Presumably we may have a chance to pattern after SWA and FDX and UPS if we turn this TA down. They make a big deal of these other airlines not having an agreement yet, but also don't mention that it is usually best to be last in line when negotiating raises. So it could actually behoove us to wait. Unless you believe that there is little upside to waiting for the industry to top out before you set "industry leading" rates. |
Originally Posted by UGBSM
(Post 1914181)
In an upward pattern bargaining environment a shorter contract is better than longer. Standard contracts used to be four years. So only three years is a plus IMO.
Presumably we may have a chance to pattern after SWA and FDX and UPS if we turn this TA down. They make a big deal of these other airlines not having an agreement yet, but also don't mention that it is usually best to be last in line when negotiating raises. So it could actually behoove us to wait. Unless you believe that there is little upside to waiting for the industry to top out before you set "industry leading" rates. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands