Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
UAL VICE CHAIRMAN  on DAL TA (interesting..) >

UAL VICE CHAIRMAN on DAL TA (interesting..)

Search
Notices

UAL VICE CHAIRMAN on DAL TA (interesting..)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2015, 06:35 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
One of the dumber questions asked on the forum.
NO - what was DUMB was rube talking about locking in rates, when everyone knows they sure as hell ain't.

There you have it folks, sailingfun says rates haven't been cut at DAL.
texavia is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 06:52 AM
  #32  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie View Post
this is the same thing you said in 2012, or about 1700 new hires ago. At some point you have to give this up, you lost that argument.
He didn't lose that argument, he is spot on.

BTW, 1700 new hires ago? You're including retirement replacements in that number which is disingenuous.

Between July 12 and July 15 we had an 894 pilot increase. Actual pilots holding a category increased by 954. Of that, half was in the 717, most growth was in the 73, M88. We combined the ER and 767 domestic category and still managed to cut the total number of pilots. We've cut about 250 WB As and 250 WB Bs, added about 840 NB As and 780 Bs.

On the seniority list you have about 12,888 new hires. At one point they were all new.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:14 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
He didn't lose that argument, he is spot on.

BTW, 1700 new hires ago? You're including retirement replacements in that number which is disingenuous.

Between July 12 and July 15 we had an 894 pilot increase. Actual pilots holding a category increased by 954. Of that, half was in the 717, most growth was in the 73, M88. We combined the ER and 767 domestic category and still managed to cut the total number of pilots. We've cut about 250 WB As and 250 WB Bs, added about 840 NB As and 780 Bs.

On the seniority list you have about 12,888 new hires. At one point they were all new.
You lost that argument. We replaced 757's with 737-900's. What does that have to do with 76 seat jets? So we didn't lose 500 WB jobs as you falsely claim, but one narrow body was replaced by another, neither of which would ever compete with a 76 seat ever, anywhere, at any time. You use total pilots but we were overstaffed in 2012 and you fail to mention that pilots required by the contract, based on block hours has jumped by 1,700+ from june 2012 to june 2015. Domestic block hours as reported by Crew Resources are up 29% from 2013 to 2015. You lost that argument.
Bananie is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:19 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie View Post
You lost that argument. We replaced 757's with 737-900's. What does that have to do with 76 seat jets? So we didn't lose 500 WB jobs as you falsely claim, but one narrow body was replaced by another, neither of which would ever compete with a 76 seat ever, anywhere, at any time. You use total pilots but we were overstaffed in 2012 and you fail to mention that pilots required by the contract, based on block hours has jumped by 1,700+ from june 2012 to june 2015. Domestic block hours as reported by Crew Resources are up 29% from 2013 to 2015. You lost that argument.
Thanks for the clarification.
Falcon7 is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:21 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 111
Default

1700 new hires since Jan 2014 actuallly
mesaba13 is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:31 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Seriously, DOES THIS TA MOVE THE BAR HIGHER?

That's what he's asking.

If you think it does, please explain how so?
When United is negotiating their next contract, about the same time we will be BTW:

777A DAL $330.03 UAL $278.36 18.6%

330A DAL $311.74 UAL $278.36 12%

7ERA DAL $276.24 UAL $ 232.15 19%

739/321 DAL $266.28 UAL $224.04 18%

A DAL 717 will pay more than a wide-body at UAL:

DAL 717A $238.36 UAL 7ERA $232.15
Falcon7 is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:38 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by texavia View Post
NO - what was DUMB was rube talking about locking in rates, when everyone knows they sure as hell ain't.

There you have it folks, sailingfun says rates haven't been cut at DAL.
I guess you both missed a decade and a small chapter 11 filing.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:39 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Co pilot
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie View Post
Of course it does. Industry leading pay, industry leading profit sharing, industry leading work rules, industry leading benefits. What else is there?

It all depends upon whether you want to talk real facts or just internet hype. The internet hype is "ignore the billion+ in gains and let's just concentrate on the little stuff". Okay, other than the 5 goals the us soccer team scored yesterday, they really didn't do anything big. In fact, if you ignore those goals, they lost 0-2. see how that works, now i get to say that team sucks because I just ignore the good things they did.

The real facts are that our health care is unchanged, if you are sick call in sick, go to a doctor and then deal with the paperwork. The vast majority of pilots will never even feel this new policy. Our scope is better not worse, more mainline flying, less DCI. The AF JV stuff is just invented crap trying to fool you, sounds like you have been fooled. Our work rules change, they always have. C2k had tons of work rule concessions. Look up negotiations in the dictionary, it doesn't include one side getting to make demands while the other shovels money in your face. This is industry leading in every possible way. After C2012, which you guys all mocked, the industry tried and failed to pattern up to us. We are already industry leading. For this united puke to talk about industry leading while still climbing on our backs as we pull him out of their hole is pretty funny. sounds like you have been fooled by him too.

You want to compare this contract to the perfect contract which will occur never. if you compare this to everyone else in the industry, no one is even close. that's raising the bar. how else would you define it?
^^^^Truth.
Woofers is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:41 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Default

900 is replacement for the 757? Call me when they start serving SNA, I want to be there for that.
badflaps is offline  
Old 07-06-2015, 07:41 AM
  #40  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Bananie View Post
this is the same thing you said in 2012, or about 1700 new hires ago. At some point you have to give this up, you lost that argument.
1700 new hires.....who cares? The airlines use revenue algorithms(such as hidden city ticketing) to shift profits where they need them. They will claim poverty at the NMB, while the regionals show billions in profits, look at your 10K if you don't believe it. Since the 50 seater can't be redeployed in markets as vast as the 76 seater, the 200 limits management's ability to do this. Thus even in the face of record profits, you will be making concessions, the TA is proof of that. JV scope works pretty much the same way as well.
Mesabah is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WatchThis!
United
254
02-10-2013 06:07 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices