Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
NC Resigns--Paging Heiko? >

NC Resigns--Paging Heiko?

Search

Notices

NC Resigns--Paging Heiko?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2015 | 10:43 AM
  #21  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Excuse my rocket surgeon dumbass knowledge of alpa, but is there anything that prevents dalpa from hiring professional, non pilots, to negotiate the contract?
Not that I'm aware of. However, and I know this is against the grain, professional negotiators want to come to a settlement and they will have to be backed up by pilots with contract administration knowledge. They don't know what is, or is not, important. They negotiate to a settlement.

This isn't baseball.

I'm not opposed to professional negotiators. I just don't know if they are a cure-all. I'm certainly willing to back the MEC if they want to try that route.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 10:52 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 107
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
+1

I like Heiko... he's a super nice guy. But make no mistake he is of the same mindset as what we've been dealing with for the past 10 years with "Moakism." He was very proud of what we did with C2012. "New blood" is exactly what we need.

Put Heiko in contract administration if he'll do it... he is ace of the bass with that stuff!
C2012 was a good, though not great contract. I think sometimes "POS" just spews from the keyboards of many posters by default. The funn6 thing is that Heiko knows more about this contract than anyone posting here, and Internet tough guy persona aside, NOT ONE of you guys would or could do a better job negotiating.
Originally Posted by Sounds
Excellent, so then the company knows exactly what we are most focused on and willing to pay the most for.


Not going to happen, NMB already said that's off the table. Do you think anyone will let one of the biggest airlines in the world stop working for even a day? C'mon now
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:13 AM
  #23  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
C2012 was a good, though not great contract. I think sometimes "POS" just spews from the keyboards of many posters by default. The funn6 thing is that Heiko knows more about this contract than anyone posting here, and Internet tough guy persona aside, NOT ONE of you guys would or could do a better job negotiating.
Probably true. I'm certainly not suggesting I should be a negotiator, as I have no experience , training, OR desire to be directly involved in something like that.

Think about this. If I hire an attorney to represent my interests and he sets off on a tangent and represents me in a way that is contrary to what I specified when I hired him, is the solution for me to fire him and represent myself or is the solution for me to fire him and hire a different attorney?

Again, Heiko's a great guy but he's a big supporter of the proactive appeasement strategy we've been using for the past 10 years. He thinks a 21% increase in pay rates over a 3 year period (C2012)... without accounting for inflation or accounting for the 42% pay cut we took... is something to brag about. In other words, his OBJECTIVE is not restoration but rather getting modest improvements digging out of a bankruptcy reset. I don't think the majority of our pilot group is on board with that kind of thinking anymore. Not with the industry restructured and our company making previously unimagined profits with even better on the horizon.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:15 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: MD88/90 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
The next Strategic Planning Committee had better produce charts showing how many Billions the Delta Pilot's concessions have contributed to Delta's record earnings, since 2004, and then another chart with Management's pay and benefit concessions since 2004.

We have already given plenty, and we have NOT been restored, by far! Our pay rates today are still 18% below 2004 rates, WITHOUT inflation! And our Retirement funding, as well as just about every other section of our 29 section contract is WORSE today then it was in 2004.

We do NOT have to 'trade' more concessions for pay rates, when we have already given so much, for so long, and the company is making BILLIONS.

This Contract has to be about RESTORATION!

We need a Strategic Planning Committee, and Negotiating Committee, and an MEC Chairman who understands that!

What he said.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #25  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Thread Starter
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
We need new blood/people to change the system. We can not continue to recycle the same worker bees, over and over again. Its MADNESS I say

TEN
I agree. We need fresh perspectives.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:39 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog Heaven
1. Recall all yes voting MEC members that refuse to resign

2. Elect new MEC, Chair (MALONE), NC

3. Take a new, comprehensive survey (You'll get good participation this time)

4. Publish the results of the survey

5. Take that "TA" and drop it into the nearest paper shredder

6. Inform the company that we intend to begin "negotiations" at square one

7. Prepare yourself for a very long wait, the company won't simply waive the surrender flag

8. Start thinking about the possibility of a strike (PEB intervention simply leads to a cooling off period..then you are free to strike)

9. Prepare to lose a month's pay

10. When the correct TA is finally produced, it must include retro-pay to 1/2016

Because we have conceded so much over the past decade, we are not in a position to negotiate. We will be making demands; demands of contractual improvements without surrendering more of the profession.

Turning a large ship around takes time and effort. The momentum has been against us for a decade. That energy is dissipating. Turning it completely around requires a mindset change and complete unity in the pilot group.

I've had enough. Have you?

^^^THIS^^^

So spot-on, it's worth repeting, word-for-word.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
+1

I like Heiko... he's a super nice guy. But make no mistake he is of the same mindset as what we've been dealing with for the past 10 years with "Moakism." He was very proud of what we did with C2012. "New blood" is exactly what we need.

Put Heiko in contract administration if he'll do it... he is ace of the bass with that stuff!
Agree. No Heiko, no Kingsley. Read their comments on the other boards. Too many ties to the old guard and fear of ruffling feathers. At this point be skeptical of everyone. Would be nice to have a solid Q & A with the candidates before anyone is put into office. If ALPA is going to be our bargaining agent going forward a lot of things/people will need major overhaul, replacement and change!
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 12:02 PM
  #28  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Jerry,

Told ya so......

Nana nana naaaaa na (or do I need to find the L&G exchange?)

Anyway, thanks for their service....I wouldn't want that job. Part of the process and we'll see where we go from here.

Ferd
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 12:04 PM
  #29  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Thread Starter
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

MtE is onto something with NC candidate q&a.
Reply
Old 08-04-2015 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

Heiko is a smart and experienced negotiator who is obviously a leading candidate. However, if I were in a position to put together and vote for a NC I would have to have assurances from Heiko and any other candidates they would be committed to and adhere to a strategy and commitment to achieve a TA without sacrificing additional concessions other than those agreed to by the MEC beforehand. And the only one that I think would pass muster at this point is a seat lock of 2 years for new hires. Other than that--nada. When asked for more just show the benefits gained from massive concessions given in the past and the failure of the company to get our inflation adjusted pay rates back to where they were over a decade ago. Include the loss of the DB plan.

During C2012 we were making record profits and still we made concessions. Why would a leopard change his spots? Yes, we're in a better position this time around, but without an assurance that would convince us of his not repeating history why and how could we trust Heiko to not make major concessions?

When I spoke to Heiko prior to the C12 TA vote I asked him why 88/90 pay was not brought up to A320 pay he answered with, "No one asked for it in the survey." I'm not saying he told me an untruth (I didn't put that in my survey response), but I spoke to about five MD88 captains who said they did. And when I asked how much giving up ALV+15 was worth in dollars I got a non-answer. Still he's capable, but obviously not overly impressive, IMHO.

Barring the hiring of professional negotiators which would deliver the best results, I'd say we could do a lot worse than Heiko, but hopefully we can do a lot better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodriver
Hangar Talk
32
12-10-2011 03:54 AM
stickwiggler
Cargo
17
05-12-2011 03:47 PM
flybywire44
Cargo
3
02-16-2011 08:22 AM
coffee
Major
11
01-14-2010 07:03 PM
Flyguppy
Major
13
04-04-2008 08:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices