Notes From C66 Recall Meeting
09-18-2015, 07:21 AM
#11
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by Sink r8
-$3,000 to $4,000 against C66 funds to create a perfect replica of a Chinese courthouse, their justice system, and respect for due process. On the other hand, they had some very tasty spring rolls, with that sweet-and-sour red sauce. De-li-cious!
Carl
09-18-2015, 08:20 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Still shilling for the Moak doctrine I see there Sink. You're nothing if not persistent with your nonsense.
Carl
Carl
TEN
09-18-2015, 09:47 AM
#13
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
How does this Moak do it? So many Moak followers, its disgusting. These boys would follow him to the trough.
TEN
TEN
Carl
09-18-2015, 10:07 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by Tanker1497
Here's an idea RMMD. Let's vote electronically, to vote electronically, for recall? That way, I don't have to listen to you and the other Dbags argue over an outdated system of voting that doesn't allow all that pay dues and are in good standing to participate in the process. What say you? Not willing to let everyone have a say in their union?
09-18-2015, 10:09 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by capncrunch
Red herring.
09-18-2015, 10:14 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by Stinsat7
So in other words using perfectly legit means to ensure voters didn't get disenfranchised. Let's face it, the way it stands now the system is designed to make participation a total hassle, like C44 holding the vote on the Friday before Labor Day.The only reason you're upset is they didn't vote the way you wanted.
09-18-2015, 11:46 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
If proxies were being assigned on the fly, then it was a violation of the constitution and bylaws, and those proxies should have been invalidated by a chairman who was more interested in ending the meeting than anything else.
09-18-2015, 11:50 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by sailingfun
That is correct. At the Atlanta meeting several pilots put ballots in for pilots who had left the meeting. They knew they shouldn't have but did it anyway. My fellow pilots amaze me at times. They did get called on it and the requirements were reiterated for the next 3 votes with more observation.
09-18-2015, 12:17 PM
#20
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
So if fraudulent proxies made a difference in the outcome, you consider that a red herring? And the 66 chair ignored the complaints of those who witnessed the activity. Fail.
Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
If proxies were being assigned on the fly, then it was a violation of the constitution and bylaws, and those proxies should have been invalidated by a chairman who was more interested in ending the meeting than anything else.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
That is correct. At the Atlanta meeting several pilots put ballots in for pilots who had left the meeting. They knew they shouldn't have but did it anyway. My fellow pilots amaze me at times. They did get called on it and the requirements were reiterated for the next 3 votes with more observation.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
