Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Delta to get EMB-190's (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/92234-delta-get-emb-190s.html)

Kabosh 12-17-2015 03:11 PM

I smell a troll....

Army80 12-17-2015 03:15 PM


Originally Posted by Czech Airman (Post 2029826)
The real question is how will the military candidates that have Delta as their career goal carrier react when they realize that by going with Delta they will have to start out in an RJ, vs. going with UAL or AA and starting out in a Boeing or Airbus.


Just my $.02:

More than likely, they will go to work for the first airline that offers them a job.

Flying an RJ for a year or two (at a decent pay rate) shouldn't be a show stopper.

aewanabe 12-17-2015 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by Captain Carrot (Post 2029815)
I'm sure it's absolute and unwaiverable. But, if management wants you to relax it you will. I don't think people will pace back and forth to fly RJs. If you don't relax it there is no way they're gonna budge on the rates.
Funny part of it is your pilot group getting all hot and bothered to fly these airplanes when not to long ago you scoffed at pilots flying them as substandard and beneath you.
Welcome to the RJ game RJ guys.

Wow. I'm not even a Delta guy and this statement reeks of so much victimization and ill-informed bum-hurt it's just sad. The 190 is an RJ only because airline management has brainwashed you into believing it. The 2400-mile range, extended over-water capabilities and greater fuel capacity than a DC9-30 or 717 make it squarely a mainline jet. The current rates may stink but it's 300-ish guys that will be flying it on DL property that otherwise wouldn't be DL pilots at all. Wanna bet they are indeed "pacing back and forth" to fly it vs staying at their current regional, corporate or retired-mil gigs?

forgot to bid 12-17-2015 03:20 PM

The 717 is much more of an rj than the 190 if you look at performance and consider they're within 10 seats of each other.

aewanabe 12-17-2015 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by Czech Airman (Post 2029826)
The real question is how will the military candidates that have Delta as their career goal carrier react when they realize that by going with Delta they will have to start out in an RJ, vs. going with UAL or AA and starting out in a Boeing or Airbus.

I'm guessing they ought not apply to AA lest they end up flying the "RJ" there as well.

forgot to bid 12-17-2015 03:30 PM

The E190 is a neat jet, probably better than the super duper dc9 we already fly. Here's to hoping it works out.

Btw if you're a complete ignorant fool and clueless as to the last 12-24 months of union life here and our scope clause language, then don't post here. Because you add nothing.

Captain Carrot 12-17-2015 03:56 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2029838)
The 717 is much more of an RJ...

Your words not mine.

I am not privy to your goings on! no. But scope has been used as a negotiating point before. I am also not a "complete" ignorant fool, thanks for the personal insult.

Beeteedubs...Why do you have a big angry purple P€#!$ as your avatar?

Captain Carrot 12-17-2015 04:10 PM

In fact, I bet they use that shiny new C-series parked in ATL today as bait to get you guys to relax the 190 back to the regionals. It does seat less than 100 seats you know.

poostain 12-17-2015 04:25 PM


Originally Posted by Kabosh (Post 2029833)
I smell a troll....

Your sense of butt hurt troll smell is keen my friend.

Army80 12-17-2015 04:30 PM


Originally Posted by Captain Carrot (Post 2029858)
In fact, I bet they use that shiny new C-series parked in ATL today as bait to get you guys to relax the 190 back to the regionals. It does seat less than 100 seats you know.


Dude, you are so clueless.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands