Airline Pilot Central Forums - Delta to get EMB-190's

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)

- Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)

- - Delta to get EMB-190's (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/92234-delta-get-emb-190s.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckleyboy (Post 2030757)

You folks who are smarter than me on scope (i.e., EVERYBODY), riddle me this: JG said during the last base visit in ATL that the scope language had to change in order to get the E190s on property. But scope has not changed...so what gives?
Methinks me knows the answer.

Like many others during this whole failed TA process, he spoke out of turn and is having to eat his words.

Quote:

Originally Posted by deadseal (Post 2031202)

Yes they do and yes they should. I didn't want to feed your trolling appetite on your last post, but I will now. Having done both I can state factually that military training is much more intense with much higher standards. It's not about the people, it's about the program. There are dumbasses and quality folks in both mil and civ.

Trolling? I'm not sure how you got the wrong impression of who I am or my intentions.

I simply made an observation. Evidently a misinformed one. You provided an explanation. In turn, I made another observation. This diversion of topic was started by others (we started out talking about EMB 190s and who is "good enough" to fly them). I was pleased to see most folks putting the military/civilian issue to rest. Now to my regret, I mentioned something to the effect that even if we as pilots are "over it," evidently an air carrier is not (wherin I cited Skywest, and later the FAA).

You're awfully quick to jump on someone who made zero inflammatory comments. I appreciate your respectful correction regarding the FAA minimums. Not sure where you're coming from on this one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zippinbye (Post 2031220)

dude are you for real?

how about "Military superiority complex is alive and well at one of our Delta Connection partners."

or " Another source of military vs. civilian douche baggery perpetuation. Evidently they view military pilots as the better candidates for flying airliners"

this is not a case of "I simply made an observation"
this is your opinion put out on a forum built from a bunch of dumbass pilots opinions and rebuttals.

everything in quotes is from your previous 2 posts fyi

thats where Im coming from

I think all of you suck regardless of where you're from.

Especially those of you who went to Florida State.

:D

Imagine the dilemma if you learned to fly privately, went to the military, got out, flew corporate, then went to the regionals. More personalities than Sybil.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 2031213)

Like many others during this whole failed TA process, he spoke out of turn and is having to eat his words.

Every second that goes by makes the TA pushers look more ignorant.

We are very fortunate to have had some common sense oriented tech savvy pilots.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley (Post 2031295)

Imagine the dilemma if you learned to fly privately, went to the military, got out, flew corporate, then went to the regionals. More personalities than Sybil.

How did you ever make it past HR with a resume like that 😜

The military trains to a mission standard, civilian trains to an economic standard because the expense is borne by the individual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2031364)

The military trains to a mission standard, civilian trains to an economic standard because the expense is borne by the individual.

The value of this assumes that all military training directly correlates with the airline world

Quote:

Originally Posted by deadseal (Post 2031260)

I was trying to be conciliatory. Apparently that does't work for you. Never mind. My "thanks" for your initial correction is withdrawn.