Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Why Delta is VA's Most Likely Suitor >

Why Delta is VA's Most Likely Suitor

Search

Notices

Why Delta is VA's Most Likely Suitor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2016 | 03:21 AM
  #61  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
That is a pretty post.

Here is the reality my friend.

The gaining carrier always gets their way. The arbitrators want to be chosen again so they can soak up the insane compensation.
Did it work that way in the PanAm/Capital, NWA/Republic and AmWest/USAIR arbitrations?
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 03:27 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow
Did it work that way in the PanAm/Capital, NWA/Republic and AmWest/USAIR arbitrations?

Take a look at Reroute's post where he says the fence will only be 5 years yet there was a 20 year fence in the NWA/RC merger.

None of us know how it would go, that is just my opinion.

I highly doubt Delta will merge with Virgin, but if we do Virgin will be a virgin no more.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 04:43 AM
  #63  
satpak77's Avatar
Working weekends
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

JetBlue or American

Likely across-town AAL for Love access

SWA is thorn in AAL side

There is a reason AAL was **not** mentioned in the article
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 05:05 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by Reroute
No way would there be a 25 year fence, more like 5 years. The list construction would be based on the credibility of your proposal, consistent with the the merger policy in effect at the time of the merger. In this case it would be an ALPA-ALPA merger, the factors to be considered in constructing a fair list in no particular order, or weight are:
  • Career expectactions
  • Longevity, and
  • Status and Category

This process, with these guidelines has recently been followed with regards to the CAL-UAL merger. The success or failure of a pilot group in an SLI is likely directly proportional to their merger committee's understanding of the guidelines established by policy, the fidelity of their proposal consistent with that policy, and their credibility with the arbitrators who would likely be the final authority on the list construction.
First off, I don't think Delta will buy Virgin, However if you look at the ALPA merger policy that you are quoting it looks like you are putting a lot of credit on the status and category part.

You mention other mergers and how they turned out, well you also have to look at the aircraft that they brought to the table and years of service that the pilots had.

Virgin is a very small, soley narrowbody aircraft airline established in what 2007? So the most senior pilot would have nine years of longevity and would hold captain on an a320.

So I don't see it going as well as you might think.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 08:13 AM
  #65  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
That is a pretty post.

Here is the reality my friend.

The gaining carrier always gets their way. The arbitrators want to be chosen again so they can soak up the insane compensation.
The reality is that the group that brings the strongest argument, consistent with the goals established by policy, will have the greater influence in the end result.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 08:35 AM
  #66  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
First off, I don't think Delta will buy Virgin, However if you look at the ALPA merger policy that you are quoting it looks like you are putting a lot of credit on the status and category part.
I'm not putting a lot of credit on the status and category part, it is simply just one of three considerations, by policy and in no particular order, which should be considered when building a fair list.

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
You mention other mergers and how they turned out, well you also have to look at the aircraft that they brought to the table and years of service that the pilots had.
I agree completely, which is why category and status, as well as longevity and career expectations are considerations when building a model to develop a fair and equitable list. In the CAL/UAL integration 65% weight was given to category and status, 35% weight to longevity.

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
Virgin is a very small, soley narrowbody aircraft airline established in what 2007? So the most senior pilot would have nine years of longevity and would hold captain on an a320.

So I don't see it going as well as you might think.
Well first of all, I never said it would go well, but I do believe that the group that brings the most credible position to the integration will have a greater impact on the final list if there were a merger, which is still speculative at this point.

Your point about the size of the airline, the aircraft they bring to the merger and the longevity of the pilots are all considerations which would need to be weighed if there were a merger.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 10:46 AM
  #67  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Reroute
I'm not putting a lot of credit on the status and category part, it is simply just one of three considerations, by policy and in no particular order, which should be considered when building a fair list.



I agree completely, which is why category and status, as well as longevity and career expectations are considerations when building a model to develop a fair and equitable list. In the CAL/UAL integration 65% weight was given to category and status, 35% weight to longevity.



Well first of all, I never said it would go well, but I do believe that the group that brings the most credible position to the integration will have a greater impact on the final list if there were a merger, which is still speculative at this point.

Your point about the size of the airline, the aircraft they bring to the merger and the longevity of the pilots are all considerations which would need to be weighed if there were a merger.
Well, now I have no doubt who reroute is.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 10:56 AM
  #68  
CheapTrick's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: A350
Default

Staple them. Or maybe take just the airplanes and gates.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 11:06 AM
  #69  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Well, now I have no doubt who reroute is.
Lol, I'm sure you have no doubt, just not sure you're right.
Reply
Old 03-27-2016 | 01:16 PM
  #70  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

I know who he is.

Still upset about your buddy Harwood getting the very well deserved boot? (clearly you deserved it as well far more than I thought given your behavior as of late)

Anyways... a VA merger isn't going to happen, and the reality is in between on how the SLI would play out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices