Search

Notices

JV Scope.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2016 | 09:46 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
dubya tee eff?

I got some news for you and some other 'clowns' as well. Management has not ever, nor ever will ask any of us what airplane they think they should buy. Carry on with your fantasy.
I don't care what they buy either.

But I do care where OUR pax fly because it is OUR airline and OUR network because it is OUR scope. If they want to fly the world in A321's, more power to them. But they have to do the same thing at AF/VA/CS/KLM/AFlot/AM/etc.

This is exactly why we need both ESK and block hour protections, and on a per theatre and per JV basis.

There can be a reasonable degree of "flexibility" in there, like staggered balancing periods where they can be below ESK's by a certain amount for a couple years as long as they're over the block hour amount or vice versa, but long term they need to balance the whole thing out.

They absolutely can NOT be trusted on this. We need to move from "gee we didn't think they'd do that" to automatically assuming they WILL do the absolute worst case version of what they could do with every letter of language in the PWA.

Instead we have guys more worried about the TVM of a one time 8% rate increase than the future of our pilot group's jobs going forward.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 10:26 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
That is a great point and something that I've been pondering. It seems with our less than average international presence, somewhere along the line our management may have been asleep at the wheel. Because as you suggest, international route authority does not happen at the snap of DAL's fingers. It seems, based on UAL's and AA's widebody fleet growths compared to DAL's, that our competitors have done a better job of nurturing and growing their international presence.

Now extrapolate that to DAL's future international presence. IF we do get all of our widebody orders (350, 330), that would represent a growth from where we are today. Where will we use them? With our paltry current widebody count, we are getting crowded out of the international markets by our rapidly growing competitors - a market that is finite with external government limitations. This is yet another reason why I don't put a lot of faith in our widebody "orders". The deferral of some of our early 350's only reinforces my doubts.
I am starting to wonder if you work for Delta. Our less then average and paltry international flying has us the number two airline in international emplacements. UAL is number 1 at 25.7 million, we are a paltry number 2 at 24.2 million with AMR third. We are the number one airline across the Atlantic, number two in the pacific and third in SA. If that is paltry what would you consider mere average?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 10:29 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I am starting to wonder if you work for Delta. Our less then average and paltry international flying has us the number two airline in international emplacements. UAL is number 1 at 25.7 million, we are a paltry number 2 at 24.2 million with AMR third. We are the number one airline across the Atlantic, number two in the pacific and third in SA. If that is paltry what would you consider mere average?
Are those numbers counting DAL metal only or JV as well?

And I'm starting to wonder that same thing...Do I work for Delta or some JV conglomerate?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 10:48 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
Are those numbers counting DAL metal only or JV as well?

And I'm starting to wonder that same thing...Do I work for Delta or some JV conglomerate?
DAL metal only.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 11:18 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
DAL metal only.
OK, thanks. What's your source and could you post it or a link to it?
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 12:05 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
DAL metal only.
Still waiting on your source information. But in the meantime, maybe you'd like to check out table 7 from the 2015 US DOT report which ranks airlines by international pax "enplanements". DAL is 3rd behind AA and UAL.

www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:49 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
Still waiting on your source information. But in the meantime, maybe you'd like to check out table 7 from the 2015 US DOT report which ranks airlines by international pax "enplanements". DAL is 3rd behind AA and UAL.

www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
I googled the numbers. Your link will not open. Can you post the full year 2015 numbers.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 05:45 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I googled the numbers. Your link will not open. Can you post the full year 2015 numbers.
Airlines ranked by 2015 international scheduled enplanements to and from the U.S. (pax #s in thousands)

1. AA 28,391.9
2. UAL 26,147.9
3. DAL 23,687.3

Google "us dot 2015 international air traffic report".
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 06:25 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
Airlines ranked by 2015 international scheduled enplanements to and from the U.S. (pax #s in thousands)

1. AA 28,391.9
2. UAL 26,147.9
3. DAL 23,687.3

Google "us dot 2015 international air traffic report".
If those are correct you still call our share paltry. I suspect my numbers were 2014 before AMR added USAIR.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 07:05 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If those are correct you still call our share paltry. I suspect my numbers were 2014 before AMR added USAIR.
This is why you don't get any respect from me. You know as well as I do you used the 2014 figures to try and mislead. You also misquote me to try and make your BS argument. I used the word paltry to describe our widebody fleet count. I referred to our international presence as below average. Last I checked, coming in #3 out of a competitive set of 3 is below average. There is no question in my mind that you and a few other screen names on APC are complete company apologists and will go to great lengths to weaken the pilot bargaining position. But I digress...

Our competitors have bypassed us in organic international growth - and are making money doing it. We keep giving away more JV leeway. It's got to stop.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TANSTAAFL
Major
79
03-09-2011 04:50 PM
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
Beagle Pilot
Major
76
05-06-2010 07:18 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
1
09-28-2005 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices