JV Scope.
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
But I do care where OUR pax fly because it is OUR airline and OUR network because it is OUR scope. If they want to fly the world in A321's, more power to them. But they have to do the same thing at AF/VA/CS/KLM/AFlot/AM/etc.
This is exactly why we need both ESK and block hour protections, and on a per theatre and per JV basis.
There can be a reasonable degree of "flexibility" in there, like staggered balancing periods where they can be below ESK's by a certain amount for a couple years as long as they're over the block hour amount or vice versa, but long term they need to balance the whole thing out.
They absolutely can NOT be trusted on this. We need to move from "gee we didn't think they'd do that" to automatically assuming they WILL do the absolute worst case version of what they could do with every letter of language in the PWA.
Instead we have guys more worried about the TVM of a one time 8% rate increase than the future of our pilot group's jobs going forward.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
That is a great point and something that I've been pondering. It seems with our less than average international presence, somewhere along the line our management may have been asleep at the wheel. Because as you suggest, international route authority does not happen at the snap of DAL's fingers. It seems, based on UAL's and AA's widebody fleet growths compared to DAL's, that our competitors have done a better job of nurturing and growing their international presence.
Now extrapolate that to DAL's future international presence. IF we do get all of our widebody orders (350, 330), that would represent a growth from where we are today. Where will we use them? With our paltry current widebody count, we are getting crowded out of the international markets by our rapidly growing competitors - a market that is finite with external government limitations. This is yet another reason why I don't put a lot of faith in our widebody "orders". The deferral of some of our early 350's only reinforces my doubts.
Now extrapolate that to DAL's future international presence. IF we do get all of our widebody orders (350, 330), that would represent a growth from where we are today. Where will we use them? With our paltry current widebody count, we are getting crowded out of the international markets by our rapidly growing competitors - a market that is finite with external government limitations. This is yet another reason why I don't put a lot of faith in our widebody "orders". The deferral of some of our early 350's only reinforces my doubts.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
I am starting to wonder if you work for Delta. Our less then average and paltry international flying has us the number two airline in international emplacements. UAL is number 1 at 25.7 million, we are a paltry number 2 at 24.2 million with AMR third. We are the number one airline across the Atlantic, number two in the pacific and third in SA. If that is paltry what would you consider mere average?
And I'm starting to wonder that same thing...Do I work for Delta or some JV conglomerate?
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Still waiting on your source information. But in the meantime, maybe you'd like to check out table 7 from the 2015 US DOT report which ranks airlines by international pax "enplanements". DAL is 3rd behind AA and UAL.
www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Still waiting on your source information. But in the meantime, maybe you'd like to check out table 7 from the 2015 US DOT report which ranks airlines by international pax "enplanements". DAL is 3rd behind AA and UAL.
www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
www.rita.gov.dot/bts/press_releases/bts018_16
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
1. AA 28,391.9
2. UAL 26,147.9
3. DAL 23,687.3
Google "us dot 2015 international air traffic report".
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
If those are correct you still call our share paltry. I suspect my numbers were 2014 before AMR added USAIR.
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Our competitors have bypassed us in organic international growth - and are making money doing it. We keep giving away more JV leeway. It's got to stop.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



