Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AMR-APA scope proposals >

AMR-APA scope proposals

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AMR-APA scope proposals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2010, 08:43 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default AMR-APA scope proposals

Recently the subject of where AMR and APA were at regarding scope was broached in a discussion. I did a websearch but could only come up with the company perspective. It appears the APA has chosen to hide their proposals behind a membership only screen. The APAnegotiations.com website used to be public, but now it isn´t. The company´s website is still open to the public:

American Airlines Negotiations

//www.aanegotiations.com/forTheRecord062609.asp

Does anyone know why the APA chose to remove their website from public view? Is it fear of ridicule or something else?
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 10:04 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
Recently the subject of where AMR and APA were at regarding scope was broached in a discussion. I did a websearch but could only come up with the company perspective. It appears the APA has chosen to hide their proposals behind a membership only screen. The APAnegotiations.com website used to be public, but now it isn´t. The company´s website is still open to the public:

American Airlines Negotiations

//www.aanegotiations.com/forTheRecord062609.asp

Does anyone know why the APA chose to remove their website from public view? Is it fear of ridicule or something else?
Perhaps they see no value in negotiating in public? But, as you say, it appears the info is available to the people they are accountable to: their members.

I'm also not an American Airlines pilot, and like you, I don't have info about how much of their own flying they want to retain. The logical answer would seem to be: all of it. I can only hope they make progress in that regard.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 10:38 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
Perhaps they see no value in negotiating in public? But, as you say, it appears the info is available to the people they are accountable to: their members.

I'm also not an American Airlines pilot, and like you, I don't have info about how much of their own flying they want to retain. The logical answer would seem to be: all of it. I can only hope they make progress in that regard.

........+1
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:28 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
Perhaps they see no value in negotiating in public?
I completely agree with the premise about not negotiating in public. What I was referring to was previously public statements about the APA´s general position which are now completely hidden from view. There´s a difference.

In my own union we have those who want our union to negotiate in public. You and I agree this is a bad idea. OTOH, having our union publish statements about our union´s position is a good idea. I was curious why the APA has chosen to withdraw completely from publicizing their position.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:44 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
I completely agree with the premise about not negotiating in public. What I was referring to was previously public statements about the APA´s general position which are now completely hidden from view. There´s a difference.

In my own union we have those who want our union to negotiate in public. You and I agree this is a bad idea. OTOH, having our union publish statements about our union´s position is a good idea. I was curious why the APA has chosen to withdraw completely from publicizing their position.
I think the problem you're not completely seeing here is that... you're also the public, as far as the APA goes. This isn't an APA vs. ALPA thing: I also think we shouldn't discuss our scope position with any other carrier, ALPA or otherwise. As it were, the RJDC did sue us, and I think there is currently a requirement to "confer". So confer we must. In APA's case, they're free from that burden.

Nobody likes to leave a cute little Beagle on the outside looking in, but no matter how much it tugs at the heart, everyone has their place. If you want to be "in" to discuss, or be informed about, APA's scope proposal, I guess you should be in APA. Or in AMR management.

My apology if this isn't the answer you're looking for. If it makes you feel any better: they won't tell me their position either. Because...I'm part of the public.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:47 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

I'm an AA pilot, I do not know the answer to your question. Is there anything else I can help you with?
7576
7576FO is offline  
Old 04-16-2010, 04:25 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Phrog Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
Does anyone know why the APA chose to remove their website from public view? Is it fear of ridicule or something else?
The answer is unknown to me, but they have taken some pretty hard hits over the years on their proposals which have offended not only your union but also other AA unions.

Here is the last thing I have on their Scope proposal. There is no reason to think they've altered their position from June 2008.
AMR Scope Proposal to APA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Negotiations Update - Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Today, management presented APA with a proposal on Section 1 of the contract, Scope.

Under management's Scope proposal, AMR would be permitted to operate jet aircraft of up to 76 seats at commuter carriers, codeshare with other airlines both domestically and internationally with dramatically reduced restrictions, and charter other operator aircraft in order to carry passenger bags. Additionally, the cockpit crewmember floor of 7300 pilots required for the company to exercise the Commuter Exception in the contract would be deleted.

Bargaining Breakdown -- SCOPE
APA Communications Committee: There is little doubt that one of the most important contract issues to pilots is scope. Similar to our compensation, scope is a contractual area where we have seen a steady and unrelenting diminishment. Our scope clause used to be simple: “All flying done by or on behalf of the company will be performed by pilots on the American Airlines seniority list.” Simple and easy to understand. Any flying done for AMR, we do it -- period. That’s not the case anymore…

The years have produced exception after exception. We now have a Commuter Air Carrier exception, a Fixed Base Operator exception, a Hawaiian Inter-Island exception, an Air Freight exception, a Domestic Codeshare exception, and an International Codeshare exception -- a total of 106 paragraphs of contractual scope language. As it relates to scope, everywhere it says, “exception,” you can substitute, “lost flying opportunity.” The exceptions have been won by the management through old-fashioned leverage, industry forces and our own lack of resolve and foresight. Regardless of how they were created, no scope exception has ever benefited the pilot group.

We have said from the inception of the current negotiations that this contract would be about restoration -- not just restoration in terms of pay, but restoration of our profession. A major piece in the restoration of our profession is the restoration of scope. Our scope proposal goes back to the original design and replaces all the exceptions and language with a simple statement.

APA Scope Proposal: All flying performed on behalf of the company or an affiliate shall be performed by pilots on the American Airlines seniority list in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement.
While our scope goal is restoration, AMR’s goal goes far beyond further eroding our scope protections to complete decimation of them.

AMR Scope Proposal:

--Allow affiliates (AE) to operate Embraer 170 class aircraft (this passenger jet would have a two-class configuration and 76 seats)

--Eliminate “international baseline” scope protection (would allow AMR unrestricted outsourcing of AA pilot jobs to international carriers through ventures like the proposed virtual merger between AA/BA/IB).

--Eliminate 7,300 cockpit crewmember floor protection of the commuter exception (theoretically, AA could then operate with zero pilots on the AA seniority list).

--Eliminate scope protections on “non-owned” commuter carriers designed to feed mainline hub operations (would allow hub-to-hub flying and allow increased point-to-point flying for AMR by a “non-owned” commuters).
Phrog Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 07:38 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
I think the problem you're not completely seeing here is that... you're also the public, as far as the APA goes. This isn't an APA vs. ALPA thing: I also think we shouldn't discuss our scope position with any other carrier, ALPA or otherwise. As it were, the RJDC did sue us, and I think there is currently a requirement to "confer". So confer we must. In APA's case, they're free from that burden.

Nobody likes to leave a cute little Beagle on the outside looking in, but no matter how much it tugs at the heart, everyone has their place. If you want to be "in" to discuss, or be informed about, APA's scope proposal, I guess you should be in APA. Or in AMR management.

My apology if this isn't the answer you're looking for. If it makes you feel any better: they won't tell me their position either. Because...I'm part of the public.
Very well said.

AA
AAflyer is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 09:10 AM
  #9  
Lifer
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: MD80 CA
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
...I was curious why the APA has chosen to withdraw completely from publicizing their position.
Beagle, you may find more of a connection with your peers on the regional forums vs. major. APA is a big boy union that looks out for AA pilots, period. APA is not a social club.
INXS is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 12:40 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by INXS View Post
Beagle, you may find more of a connection with your peers on the regional forums vs. major. APA is a big boy union that looks out for AA pilots, period. APA is not a social club.
I can agree with you there. Their backstabbing antics with us and the APFA, not to mention others, shows them to be acting like a boys club. Good to see you and I recognize the problem.
Originally Posted by Phrog Phlyer View Post
Here is the last thing I have on their Scope proposal. There is no reason to think they've altered their position from June 2008.
Thanks for the info. I'd seen that before, but couldn't find it on their regular website nor the "now you see it, now you don't" APA negotiations website.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F-90 Driver
Major
58
02-14-2010 03:16 PM
Spanky189
Major
13
01-30-2010 10:11 AM
EWRflyr
Major
57
09-23-2009 05:30 PM
shua757
Major
22
05-24-2009 06:06 AM
Phlying Phallus
Major
191
02-12-2009 02:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices