Search

Notices

JV Scope.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2016 | 02:22 PM
  #61  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Satchip,

My posts were not what you recast. I'm happy to discuss and provide insight, but have no interest in arguing.

Nothing I wrote suggests that anyone in ALPA does not believe scope can, or should, be enforced. What I wrote is that some believe the only method is the grievance process. The grievance process has the same enforceability as a Federal District Court decision, with less right to appeal.

C2K ended in concessionary LOA's to avoid bankruptcy. The concessions were negotiated and ALPA never lost control of the process. The Allied Pilots Association fought American into bankruptcy Court and got most of their labor protective provisions rewritten by the bankruptcy Judge. As a result, American has scope allows larger & heavier RJ flying than Delta or United.

ALPA's results were better than APA's.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 08-28-2016 at 02:38 PM.
Reply
Old 08-28-2016 | 04:56 PM
  #62  
Vikz09's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: M88 B
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Ahhhhh here is a good argument. ESK vs block hour. IF one believes that the 747 is dead, and the 380 is DOA, one has to ask what will AF/KLM replace them with. My gut tells me that since the Ex/Im bank is still alive, they are gonna be buying big 777s. So, maybe the ESK argument is better for us. But... if they don't, and go Airbus, we are in the same boat as they but block hours would be more advantageous to us due to similar size airframes. The thing that I found outrageous in TA15 was the immediate drop to 50/50 on block hours (from our then current 52%) and a further reduction to 49% "grace". That was asinine. So how do we fix that?

And you are absolutely right. Trying to have a SWA style scope clause where every DAL passenger flies on DAL metal is silly. (I'll betcha that the SWA scope clause fails in the next contract if not this one). So PS is the about the only way other than maybe management style stock options at this point where we can recapture some of that loss.

What say you?
Or Delta management gets their way and we convert to block hours from EASK. JV partners continue to fly 777's, and A-350's, while Delta orders up the A321LR and begins flying a narrowbody overseas. In their grand scheme we would be in compliance flying narrowbody airbuses, while our JV partners flying planes seating 100 more passengers

What say you?
Reply
Old 08-28-2016 | 05:43 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
Or Delta management gets their way and we convert to block hours from EASK. JV partners continue to fly 777's, and A-350's, while Delta orders up the A321LR and begins flying a narrowbody overseas. In their grand scheme we would be in compliance flying narrowbody airbuses, while our JV partners flying planes seating 100 more passengers

What say you?
"we didn't think they would do that"
Reply
Old 08-28-2016 | 07:03 PM
  #64  
JamesBond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
Or Delta management gets their way and we convert to block hours from EASK. JV partners continue to fly 777's, and A-350's, while Delta orders up the A321LR and begins flying a narrowbody overseas. In their grand scheme we would be in compliance flying narrowbody airbuses, while our JV partners flying planes seating 100 more passengers

What say you?
Bigger pays more. Congratulations.
Reply
Old 08-28-2016 | 10:53 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
"we didn't think they would do that"
Bwahahahahahahahaha exactly
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 12:01 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
Or Delta management gets their way and we convert to block hours from EASK. JV partners continue to fly 777's, and A-350's, while Delta orders up the A321LR and begins flying a narrowbody overseas. In their grand scheme we would be in compliance flying narrowbody airbuses, while our JV partners flying planes seating 100 more passengers

What say you?
Compare the range of the A321 to the 757ER with winglets. Yhe decide if it's practical in the winter with 180 knot headwinds coming home. Also look at it from a economical standpoint as far as revenue.
Last take a look at the twin aisle production balance.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:01 AM
  #67  
Vikz09's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: M88 B
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Compare the range of the A321 to the 757ER with winglets. Yhe decide if it's practical in the winter with 180 knot headwinds coming home. Also look at it from a economical standpoint as far as revenue.
Last take a look at the twin aisle production balance.
Perhaps you should look at the specifics for the A-321NEO LR. It will have almost identical range to the 757. Besides Boeing is working on a new narrowbody that will replace the 757 and its range.

You clowns wonder why management is asking for block hours vs. EASK? I understand its not a concern for you or jamesbond as you will be gone. However, management is setting this up for 5 years from now!
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 04:22 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The grievance process has the same enforceability as a Federal District Court decision, with less right to appeal.
You bring up an interesting point. 45 U.S.C. s184 (a part of the Railway Labor Act) requires that every collective bargaining agreement made within the airline industry provide for a system board of adjustment (aka arbitration board). However, unlike our railway brethern which have defined standards and even a national system board of adjustment, our arbitration process is a bit more nebulous and therefore has been mainly defined by court decisions to establish the framework and standards for arbitration and appeal.

Here is the issue for the "just grieve it" line of thinking...once you start, you better win. If you lose, the only legally recognizeable standards for appealing a decision of the system board are: (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption by the arbitrators; (3) there was arbitral misconduct, such as refusal to hear material evidence; or (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed their powers that they failed to render a mutual, final and definite award.

Basically, the only way to get your foot in the door on an appeal is to establish abuse of discretion or misconduct on the part of the neutral. That is why many of the bigger grievances (JV) are settled by agreement rather than waiting for a system board adjustment. A partial win is often better than a complete loss.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 05:06 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 107
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
Perhaps you should look at the specifics for the A-321NEO LR. It will have almost identical range to the 757. Besides Boeing is working on a new narrowbody that will replace the 757 and its range.

You clowns wonder why management is asking for block hours vs. EASK? I understand its not a concern for you or jamesbond as you will be gone. However, management is setting this up for 5 years from now!
Having heard from a few different references, there ain't nothing out there that can compete with the 757 for certain routes. Not the "A321NEO LR" nor the "737-900ERMAX" (or whatever other ridiculous moniker Airbus and Boeing can tag on to increasingly stretched versions of 30 year old designs).

Further, Boeing screwed up when they discontinued the 757 line in 2004. Any replacement that can match or exceed its capabilities would certainly be welcome but is still speculative at best and years away even if Boeing announced it tomorrow.

This idea that we will exclusively be flying 739s and A321s across the pond while our JV partners fly A380s and 777s is just a red herring from the gleefully angry crowd.
Reply
Old 08-29-2016 | 05:09 AM
  #70  
JamesBond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by Vikz09
Perhaps you should look at the specifics for the A-321NEO LR. It will have almost identical range to the 757. Besides Boeing is working on a new narrowbody that will replace the 757 and its range.

You clowns wonder why management is asking for block hours vs. EASK? I understand its not a concern for you or jamesbond as you will be gone. However, management is setting this up for 5 years from now!
dubya tee eff?

I got some news for you and some other 'clowns' as well. Management has not ever, nor ever will ask any of us what airplane they think they should buy. Carry on with your fantasy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TANSTAAFL
Major
79
03-09-2011 04:50 PM
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
Beagle Pilot
Major
76
05-06-2010 07:18 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
1
09-28-2005 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices