Scope and Cost Neutral
#21
You would wait five years for them to be completely obsolete, when you could have it done in half the time, with more pay, more seniority (e.g. more pilots on the seniority list below you), and a few more 76-seat jets which will STILL, eventually be at mainline anyway? (Purely hypothetical)
#22
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
I edited it out. No infraction given.
Although innocuous by itself we don't need to start down that road. I edited some of Jerry's posts and reminded him of what is expected of posters and he responded very graciously and has been posting very responsibly ever since.Scoop
#23
Bus driver
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 894
Likes: 9
I hope my emoticon suggested the TIC nature of my little joke. I do appreciate the tone on this forum, while still talking passionately about our ideas and thoughts.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
In my opinion.
JV scope immediately in compliance.
Allowing convergence to block hours.
$300 million a year and beyond imagination going forward 10 years. Well over $1 Billion per year.
50 more 76 seat jets to DCI.
$300 million per year.
Aips
$200 million per year.
Total $800 million per year.
Cost neutral
Self funding
Why are we making concessions?
JV scope immediately in compliance.
Allowing convergence to block hours.
$300 million a year and beyond imagination going forward 10 years. Well over $1 Billion per year.
50 more 76 seat jets to DCI.
$300 million per year.
Aips
$200 million per year.
Total $800 million per year.
Cost neutral
Self funding
Why are we making concessions?
Seems like that.
Please see my questions in the other post and respond when you have time with facts.
#25
#29
#30
Like the commercial. "It's what he does" (sic)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



