Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Scope and Cost Neutral >

Scope and Cost Neutral

Search

Notices

Scope and Cost Neutral

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2016 | 05:38 PM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
Sorry, but if you think the average line pilot, for the smallest fraction of a nano-second will hold out for a contract that brings all DCI flying in-house, seriously dude, you HAVE GOT TO give me the number for your supplier!
That is not my point at all.

We just have to compare apples to apples.

Some are saying SWA did us no favors. The fact is their PWA would add more than a billion per year to our costs.

Tired of the constant lowering of expectations.
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 05:44 PM
  #32  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
Honest question. (Keep in mind, I haven't seen any language of "scope gives" yet. Just a bunch of blind, gibberish-filled bullet points from Jerry.)

You wouldn't make a compromise for more mainline flying, leading to more mainline pilots, to include less DCI flying/jets/pilots, to make a deal with Mgmt.?

Do you have such disdain for anything Delta (Mgmt.)? Disdain for getting a deal, that ultimately benefits this pilots group? Or just such a subterranean lack of how negotiations and compromises during negotiations work, that you wouldn't trade a $5 bill for the company's $100 bill?
Explain why United, UPS, FedEx and SWA pilots got deals and made no concessions.

We have seriously degraded sick leave. Written a blank check for virtual basing. Forced Self funding VEBA on all Delta pilots.

Now scope.

The American and United union leaders both made it completely clear to everyone in their management day 1 that scope was off the table.

The DCI 70/76 seat fleet is twice the size of any of our fleets. Let's give them more!
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 05:45 PM
  #33  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Meanwhile Gerry threw out the number 8000. He just throws stuff out there hoping something is correct trying to promote his DPA agenda.

WN pilots fly wayyyy more block hours per pilot by the way. Those guys work freaking hard, even with trips touching.
Come on 80. Put costs to scope concessions.

Or do they cost us nothing?
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 05:48 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Explain why United, UPS, FedEx and SWA pilots got deals and made no concessions.

We have seriously degraded sick leave. Written a blank check for virtual basing. Forced Self funding VEBA on all Delta pilots.

Now scope.

The American and United union leaders both made it completely clear to everyone in their management day 1 that scope was off the table.

The DCI 70/76 seat fleet is twice the size of any of our fleets. Let's give them more!
Because you are lying to the pilots about basic facts.

UAL: concessions were baked in from bankruptcy.
FedEx: there were work rule concessions including changing a big money DH item amongst others.
UPS: made concessions to get their rates. call it what you will, they were efficiency gains for the company.
SWA: also made concessions and went five plus years for a deal.

So you want to revisit those?
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 05:51 PM
  #35  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Jerry, you often times fly with a good friend of mine in DTW. Overall, I think you're a good person too, with your heart in the right place, but somehow your passionate message gets skewed by lack of factual data. I'm not sure why?

Originally Posted by gzsg
Explain why United, UPS, FedEx and SWA pilots got deals and made no concessions.
SWA didn't make concessions on code-share agreements? C'mon Jerry, you know better. Why do you post these things?
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 06:14 PM
  #36  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

The union leaders at American and United instructed their negotiators they were not allowed to discuss scope during negotiations.

IMO the scope concessions we will make are severe and unnecessary.

Just my opinion.

The Donatelli JV scope settlement set a terrible precedent. Management after being brought into instant compliance can immediately move out of compliance and only fear tiny checks to all Delta pilots after a couple of more years.

Noncompliance needs to have immediate payments and penalties on par with the widebody positions lost.

The remedy must be in the contract.

Grievances are based on past practice. Donatelli harmed us beyond belief.
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 06:17 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
Sorry, but if you think the average line pilot, for the smallest fraction of a nano-second will hold out for a contract that brings all DCI flying in-house, seriously dude, you HAVE GOT TO give me the number for your supplier!
If there are no wide body jobs left after a concessionary JV scope or a scope clause ignored with little penalty, then yes bring on all the dci flying!

With our company making billions we should not have to give any concessions which includes increasing the number of large RJs!

Not sure the dci guys would want to work under our lack of QOL contract unless there was a future of wide body flying, but 18 777 at top pay affects how many pilots on the list and the rumored JV sellout equals how many more jobs?

After this contract we will have nothing left to give to get, so how will we negotiate in the future?
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 06:18 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
The union leaders at American and United instructed their negotiators they were not allowed to discuss scope during negotiations.

IMO the scope concessions we will make are severe and unnecessary.

Just my opinion.

The Donatelli JV scope settlement set a terrible precedent. Management after being brought into instant compliance can immediately move out of compliance and only fear tiny checks to all Delta pilots after a couple of more years.

Noncompliance needs to have immediate payments and penalties on par with the widebody positions lost.

The remedy must be in the contract.

Grievances are based on past practice. Donatelli harmed us beyond belief.
you said NO CONCESSIONS.

Its right up there.

Now you are talking about scope?

Lets tackle one of your misinformation pieces at a time please.

So, can you answer the lie you just put forth that NO airline who recently got a contract had to give up anything?
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 06:39 PM
  #39  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
The union leaders at American and United instructed their negotiators they were not allowed to discuss scope during negotiations.

IMO the scope concessions we will make are severe and unnecessary.

Just my opinion.

The Donatelli JV scope settlement set a terrible precedent. Management after being brought into instant compliance can immediately move out of compliance and only fear tiny checks to all Delta pilots after a couple of more years.

Noncompliance needs to have immediate payments and penalties on par with the widebody positions lost.

The remedy must be in the contract.

Grievances are based on past practice. Donatelli harmed us beyond belief.

1st: DPA=USAPA Part II

2nd: Scope Concessions....how is reducing DCI airframes and available seats with mainline block hour protections severe? Also, prove widebody jobs were lost due to the JV Scope non compliance. Prove that widebody flying weren't moved to more profitable theatres.
Reply
Old 09-06-2016 | 06:42 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
1st: DPA=USAPA Part II

2nd: Scope Concessions....how is reducing DCI airframes and available seats with mainline block hour protections severe? Also, prove widebody jobs were lost due to the JV Scope non compliance. Prove that widebody flying weren't moved to more profitable theatres.
Yeah, you're right. I guess the company decided to pay $30mil out of the goodness of their heart.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
Turbanpilot
American
1446
12-24-2014 05:31 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
4
12-15-2010 05:57 AM
av8rmike
Cargo
36
09-16-2006 10:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices