Scope and Cost Neutral
09-09-2016 | 06:34 AM
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Passengers also have to book them. No one is going to book that at a fare level Delta can offer and make money. The airplane won't make it anyway.
09-09-2016 | 07:36 AM
#132
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Single aisle is already in the trans Atlantic market. We operate several routes with the 757. This is the logical next step, a new more efficient airplane. Too bad Boeing got rid of the 757. This will happen.
09-09-2016 | 08:01 AM
#133
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
09-09-2016 | 09:18 AM
#134
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
We won't have to worry about it. Bigger/more RJs will accommodate more international operations. Regional international flying is up 50% YTD. We just outsource anyway and move mainline to other routes, no growth.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d..._8k-ex9901.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d..._8k-ex9901.htm
09-09-2016 | 09:27 AM
#135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: M88 B
09-09-2016 | 11:00 AM
#136
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
In my opinion.
JV scope immediately in compliance.
Allowing convergence to block hours.
$300 million a year and beyond imagination going forward 10 years. Well over $1 Billion per year.
50 more 76 seat jets to DCI.
$300 million per year.
Aips
$200 million per year.
Total $800 million per year.
Cost neutral
Self funding
Why are we making concessions?
JV scope immediately in compliance.
Allowing convergence to block hours.
$300 million a year and beyond imagination going forward 10 years. Well over $1 Billion per year.
50 more 76 seat jets to DCI.
$300 million per year.
Aips
$200 million per year.
Total $800 million per year.
Cost neutral
Self funding
Why are we making concessions?
Apparently both sides want another rejected TA. That's cool. We can give them that.
09-09-2016 | 01:04 PM
#137
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Yes they are and the new generation of narrow bodies will replace the 757 in the limited markets it currently flies.
09-09-2016 | 01:15 PM
#138
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Until competitive pressures drive them into other markets. Or that's what management will say. At $8000 a seat do you think a premium brand product with 80 lie flat pods on a 737 would work? I'm not saying it will or not but I disagree with your limited vision of the use of certain airframes. The CS-100 could do DTW-ANC but I'm sure you will argue network would never do that. But it could. Latin America has seen regional flying grow 50%.
09-09-2016 | 03:48 PM
#139
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Until competitive pressures drive them into other markets. Or that's what management will say. At $8000 a seat do you think a premium brand product with 80 lie flat pods on a 737 would work? I'm not saying it will or not but I disagree with your limited vision of the use of certain airframes. The CS-100 could do DTW-ANC but I'm sure you will argue network would never do that. But it could. Latin America has seen regional flying grow 50%.
09-09-2016 | 05:10 PM
#140
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
No, I didn't say that. I think we should keep our quality of life provisions, not provide concessions during record profits and retain our profit sharing to hedge against outsourcing and benefit from the growth of the company while earning roughly industry average pay rates for the flying we do.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
