Search

Notices

Yes/No TA Perspective

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:17 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
After quite a few posts here recently, I have come to one general thought on the differences between the yes and the no voters.

No voters and the ones leaning that way look at this TA and compare it to what they think we should have and see a minus. Yes voters and the ones leaning that way look at this TA and compare it to what we currently have and see a plus.

IMO, when considering the pros and cons of this TA, one should be comparing it to what we currently have. Not an esoteric version of what should be.

Denny
That's no different from the yes/no environment leading up to the failed TA. If you're just going to ignore where you think you should be, then you may as well take the first offer of a raise put in front of you.
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:20 AM
  #12  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Well, it's all about you isn't it.
No, it's absolutely NOT all about me.. Just trying to get a perspective of what QOL means to you? I hear the "buzz word" Quality of Life thrown out there all the time. Just wondering where it's coming from, as my QOL is excellent. Now if you're a 2014-2016 new-hire complaining about QOL issues, well you're barking up the wrong tree.

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Every contract since BK we have given productivity concessions. C2012 cost us something like 250 jobs, no idea on this one. Again, show me that this TA will not cost us jobs with VB, WB ALV increase etc.
I can't speak for "every contract since BK.." I was a 2008 hire. I don't come on this forum complaining about how bad I've had it since 2008, and maybe you shouldn't either. From what Sailling, Denny, JB, et. al. have said, I think everyone hired post 2007-2008 era have had it pretty good! (Minus the threat of furlough during the economic downturn.)

I get it. We're pilots and we like to complain about enough never being good enough! (It's in our DNA.)

Originally Posted by Free Bird
BTW, is the whole Princess thing necessary? You have no idea what I've been through. But I'm sure it makes you feel better so...........
As you have no idea what others on here or at Delta have been through either! I've been military for over 25 years and have low tolerance or patience for someone sounding like a Nancy! (Sorry if "Princess" offended your generational shortcomings!)
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:26 AM
  #13  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
I'm a solid NO vote and it's due to the fact that this TA will result in an overall reduction in our quality of life. This TA certainly will not improve our QOL, I don't even think it will maintain it, we're still moving backwards.

Passing this TA sends a very clear message to management going forward. Is all management has to do is low ball us with a TA, if we accept it great and if we don't that's fine too. Then within a year or two the pilots will accept QOL concessions just to keep up with the rest of the industry.

If we can't make improvements now, not restoration, just improvements to our quality of life now, we will more that likely continue to see our QOL decline in the future when the retirements kick in. Really hope I'm wrong on that.
This will vastly improve my QOL. mucho mas.
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:39 AM
  #14  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Well, it's all about you isn't it.

Lets pretend that from one year to the next Delta were to do the same amount of flying with the same number of airplanes. Pass this TA and it will require fewer pilots to do the same amount of flying. I would love to see the math on this if I'm wrong.

Every contract since BK we have given productivity concessions. C2012 cost us something like 250 jobs, no idea on this one. Again, show me that this TA will not cost us jobs with VB, WB ALV increase etc.

BTW, is the whole Princess thing necessary? You have no idea what I've been through. But I'm sure it makes you feel better so...........

Don't forget, those productivity concessions that cost jobs are also going to be offset by a certain amount by increased vacation pay and credit, and increased training pay and credit.

I'd like to see what the overall give vs. gain is, as well.

But, I do know it doesn't all go against us.
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:39 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Cap. 737
Default

I'm curious, when is the vote?
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 09:56 AM
  #16  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

The vote opens on Nov 10 (I think) and closes on December 01.

Scoop
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 10:03 AM
  #17  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify
That's no different from the yes/no environment leading up to the failed TA. If you're just going to ignore where you think you should be, then you may as well take the first offer of a raise put in front of you.
I don't agree with that. I think, when placed side by side, the failed TA was worse than C2012 in a number of areas. That is exactly why it was voted down.

I think the vast majority of pilots are realists. They want that esoteric perfect contract but are savvy enough to realize they aren't going to get it. But they can sure smell a turd when one shows up. So it comes down to a decision based on compromise and where do we go if this gets voted down? No matter which way anyone votes, this is a business decision not an emotional one.

Denny
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 10:09 AM
  #18  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

I was a no on C2012 and a hard No on TA 15. I've seen nothing in TA16 to push me to a No.

As to QOL, this agreement will certainly enhance mine. I plan to fly a good bit less.
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 10:24 AM
  #19  
Free Bird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
No, it's absolutely NOT all about me.. Just trying to get a perspective of what QOL means to you? I hear the "buzz word" Quality of Life thrown out there all the time. Just wondering where it's coming from, as my QOL is excellent. Now if you're a 2014-2016 new-hire complaining about QOL issues, well you're barking up the wrong tree.



I can't speak for "every contract since BK.." I was a 2008 hire. I don't come on this forum complaining about how bad I've had it since 2008, and maybe you shouldn't either. From what Sailling, Denny, JB, et. al. have said, I think everyone hired post 2007-2008 era have had it pretty good! (Minus the threat of furlough during the economic downturn.)

I get it. We're pilots and we like to complain about enough never being good enough! (It's in our DNA.)



As you have no idea what others on here or at Delta have been through either! I've been military for over 25 years and have low tolerance or patience for someone sounding like a Nancy! (Sorry if "Princess" offended your generational shortcomings!)
If someone who god forbid wants a jobs positive contract is a "Nancy" then yeah, call me what you want.

And oh by the way, I was hired back when this job offered a really good quality of life and a pension. To be fair, I didn't complain about my quality of life, only that I wanted to try and improve upon it. I know that's taboo around these parts.

I won't sink to Elliots level and name call, so I'm out of here.
Reply
Old 10-27-2016 | 10:49 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliot
No, it's absolutely NOT all about me.. Just trying to get a perspective of what QOL means to you? I hear the "buzz word" Quality of Life thrown out there all the time. Just wondering where it's coming from, as my QOL is excellent. Now if you're a 2014-2016 new-hire complaining about QOL issues, well you're barking up the wrong tree.



I can't speak for "every contract since BK.." I was a 2008 hire. I don't come on this forum complaining about how bad I've had it since 2008, and maybe you shouldn't either. From what Sailling, Denny, JB, et. al. have said, I think everyone hired post 2007-2008 era have had it pretty good! (Minus the threat of furlough during the economic downturn.)

I get it. We're pilots and we like to complain about enough never being good enough! (It's in our DNA.)



As you have no idea what others on here or at Delta have been through either! I've been military for over 25 years and have low tolerance or patience for someone sounding like a Nancy! (Sorry if "Princess" offended your generational shortcomings!)
Originally Posted by Free Bird
If someone who god forbid wants a jobs positive contract is a "Nancy" then yeah, call me what you want.

And oh by the way, I was hired back when this job offered a really good quality of life and a pension. To be fair, I didn't complain about my quality of life, only that I wanted to try and improve upon it. I know that's taboo around these parts.

I won't sink to Elliots level and name call, so I'm out of here.
I don't do chit chat but I see a lot of posts decrying the toxic nature of that place, presumably attributed to the "no crowd".

Take a look at Elliot's little master piece. A bunch of false bravado and own crank stomping. The civil thing to do would be to apologize to Free Bird, but I'll bet he doesn't because that's not in his DNA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
4
06-15-2012 06:50 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
15
04-15-2009 06:07 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
104
01-07-2008 06:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices