SWA solidly passes their TA2
#51
Exactly, cutting pay or making it neutral would be unconscionable but somehow QOL is not viewed equally. We are selling QOL for pay. I think that is shameful. Obviously I'm in the minority. The reverse would never be true.
Whose to say we are not taking less of a pay raise to preserve QOL items? IMO more pay is a huge QOL addition. You don't seem to take that into account in any of your posts.
Even if this were voted down pay rates are likely to increase. There are no provisions for increased QOL in our current PWA. Holding on to the current QOL standard is now not even a consideration while not getting a pay raise was never even a remote possibility. I get the fervor over pay rates but I'm saddened it comes at the expense of QOL items.
I refer you to what I said above about pay being a big addition to QOL.
We will not be able to make this stand in the next contract negotiations given the increasing productivity demands we will see with upcoming retirements.
Whose to say we are not taking less of a pay raise to preserve QOL items? IMO more pay is a huge QOL addition. You don't seem to take that into account in any of your posts.
Even if this were voted down pay rates are likely to increase. There are no provisions for increased QOL in our current PWA. Holding on to the current QOL standard is now not even a consideration while not getting a pay raise was never even a remote possibility. I get the fervor over pay rates but I'm saddened it comes at the expense of QOL items.
I refer you to what I said above about pay being a big addition to QOL.
We will not be able to make this stand in the next contract negotiations given the increasing productivity demands we will see with upcoming retirements.
QOL comes in all shapes and sizes. IIRC, when I said this pay raise would allow a pilot to drop a trip every other month (conservatively) and make the same money as s/he did last year, you said that was exactly your plan. IMO that is by far the biggest QOL gain that dwarfs any QOL losses.
Denny
#52
We are already in the big productivity demand era and it won't be ending until way after I'm gone (2023).
QOL comes in all shapes and sizes. IIRC, when I said this pay raise would allow a pilot to drop a trip every other month (conservatively) and make the same money as s/he did last year, you said that was exactly your plan. IMO that is by far the biggest QOL gain that dwarfs any QOL losses.
Denny
QOL comes in all shapes and sizes. IIRC, when I said this pay raise would allow a pilot to drop a trip every other month (conservatively) and make the same money as s/he did last year, you said that was exactly your plan. IMO that is by far the biggest QOL gain that dwarfs any QOL losses.
Denny
And the fact that we are retreating on SCOPE, SICK, and 3B4 doesn't help either. This sets us up poorly for the future.
#53
It is my plan. Part of the plan requires my ability to manipulate my schedule, which will be more difficult under the TA. Trips pulled from open time will reduce that. Virtual bases will reduce that. I'm sure I will find a way to survive.
And the fact that we are retreating on SCOPE, SICK, and 3B4 doesn't help either. This sets us up poorly for the future.
And the fact that we are retreating on SCOPE, SICK, and 3B4 doesn't help either. This sets us up poorly for the future.
3B4 affects QOL because it could cause a raise in pay. With this contract I don't see it having any bearing on our pay prior to entering into the next Section 6 negotiations so I see it as having no effect on QOL for this contract duration. Sick leave I think is a wash for QOL. Guys who verify the first 100 hours now will just have to verify the second 100 hours. Yes, I know it is nice to verify if you are going into the Dr anyway, but it's just not that big of a deal to me based on my sick leave usage and I've ended up using more this calendar year than I ever have. Scope can have a big effect on QOL. This is where I could see your QOL argument gaining a bit of steam.
With the results in from yesterday, I think we would be very foolish not to approve this contract. YMMV
Denny
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Not arguing, but interested in how you arrived at that conclusion. What about DL makes us more resilient to a big downturn compared to UA/AA?
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Yeah but those who roll usually end up working as much or less than if they didn't roll. Most of the time on their original work days (for both RT and RC).
#56
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
#57
We may be healthier in a downturn, financially, but if passengers show up in lesser numbers, you can bet we will park as many aircraft as UAL or AAL
#58
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: 7ER FO
Respectfully disagree, sir. The debt servicing differential (which is in excess of $15 Billion) plus the older fleet (i.e., not paying high lease or ownership cost for new aircraft) make Delta poised to weather a downturn without parking an equal amount of planes.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



