Delta Widebody count
12-09-2016 | 07:19 AM
#31
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
12-09-2016 | 07:22 AM
#32
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,365
Likes: 846
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
They don't even know. And accurate is not the word I'd use. 757s seems to disappear and reappear every 6 months. 737 orders are cancelled, then they're not. E190s are the future NB replacement then, oops. The C-series still needs another real order to be viable. 787s still on the books. Used 777s abound for cheap, what ever happened to that one?
12-09-2016 | 07:24 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Doubt it. That thing is a POS jobs program and not a serious airplane. Its applications for us would be severely limited. A cheap lease deal would only go so far to justify something so otherwise out of the realm like that. I'm not seeing it at any price.
12-09-2016 | 07:24 AM
#34
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,365
Likes: 846
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
12-09-2016 | 07:30 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
And its only a carrot if we have both ESK and BH protections within each JV.
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
12-09-2016 | 07:45 AM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 137
Likes: 1
From: Gold-Braided Lesser French Fort Commander
And its only a carrot if we have both ESK and BH protections within each JV.
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
ATL-MCO baby!!! Just like the old days! Cheapest seat-cost/air-mile right? Especially if they were almost free. And we own our own refinery! What else could go wrong?
12-09-2016 | 08:15 AM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 336
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
And its only a carrot if we have both ESK and BH protections within each JV.
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
I really don't see that plane here, but if we did it would probably be for AMS/CDG/LHR feeding, which would spank us hard in that JV. Maybe they'll threaten us with them and we'll have to "pony up" to get them not to get them
12-09-2016 | 08:16 AM
#39
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 57
From: 765A
Maybe however it is 10,000 lbs heavier then the current A330 without a increase in gross weight. Airbus is not going to build it with the current order book. Rumor is a mix of CEO A330's and additional A350's if the 330-900 does not get built. Not sure how that ties into Boeing pride.
12-09-2016 | 08:21 AM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
