![]() |
It was just a vote to have a vote today... the unionoids showed up and were clucking away. It'll be interesting how the actual council wide vote goes (very glad we have that).
|
Originally Posted by buckleyboy
(Post 2287718)
Now that you know, pray tell what this margin means and/or why it matters.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2287736)
It means it passed and there will now be a vote by all council 44 pilots.
|
The entire process (aka C-44 clown show) is an embarrassment to all
Delta pilots. Nothing more than Chuck S. blocking Donald's picks. Wreaks of dirty politics and we look like a joke in front of Delta Mgmt. |
Originally Posted by Elliot
(Post 2287755)
...C-44 clown show
Now that TA2 is history, I don't think Jimmy or Chris really want to be reps. Their DPA is dying, no contract negotiations to grandstand over; maybe they'll spare us more "clown" and just resign. They don't want to do the work. |
Originally Posted by Dharma
(Post 2287785)
One man's holy crusade is another man's clown show.
Now that TA2 is history, I don't think Jimmy or Chris really want to be reps. Their DPA is dying, no contract negotiations to grandstand over; maybe they'll spare us more "clown" and just resign. They don't want to do the work. |
Originally Posted by Wuzatforus
(Post 2287797)
I guess you didn't get retro or a raise?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2287591)
Rumor is it was not even a close vote. True?
|
Other than occasionally reading this board I pay zero attention to ALPA politics. Fortunately having read this board, I know that anything the Moakies want is something I don't want. With zero knowledge of what these 2 FO's allegedly did, I'll vote to keep them. Thanks Obama.
|
Originally Posted by MikeF16
(Post 2287886)
Other than occasionally reading this board I pay zero attention to ALPA politics. Fortunately having read this board, I know that anything the Moakies want is something I don't want. With zero knowledge of what these 2 FO's allegedly did, I'll vote to keep them. Thanks Obama.
Line pilots generally only judge a rep on how they may vote or what position they appear to take on a subject. The job is much more than that. The MEC isn't Congress, (how is their approval rating?) it is a board and behavior, process etc matter. When you have former "anti Moak" North Reps that have ZERO political ambition supporting their recall, that should be enough to know that the recall has nothing to do with Moakism. If the shoe were on the other foot and these two were perceived as Moakies and based on their actions, social media would be in support of their recall just like it was last year for the previous reps. It seems like anytime the perceived social media majority is in the minority on a position, it immediately labels the opposing side as Moakies (it certainly is not in this case), that the room is stacked with people from the Admin (again false as the Admin would be their supporters), that the average line pilot didn't know as "every guy I fly with says...." (Again BS, many, many communications have been put out to the pilots of 44.) So maybe it just happens that line pilots who have a different opinion than the social media majority, actually took the time to bid off, go to a meeting and let their voices be heard without their being some conspiracy or personal agenda other than they don't feel like THEY are being represented? Naaaa it was all just a bunch of Moakies who want to be in power again... SMDH... Please excuse typos and grammar as I am in a hurry. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands