Endeavor policy on FAR 117 extensions
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: CaptFo
I take them all. Sorry we take them all...as long as everyone is 👌 We continue. I was just pointing out that IF you are NY based...extensions are pretty much standard ops.
#12
Bus Driver ordinarie
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Airbus CA
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
I'm calling it! A couple of 30 minutes over 18 months. You're much more likely to loose flying than be extended. Pay protection is a wonderful thing. I'm LGA based, and the JFK experience may vary, but i've not personally experienced much of the delays there.. heard the holding instructions many times though! 

#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
#15
Yup, this past weekend was an absolute debacle in JFK... but runway 22L/4R opened this afternoon so hopefully that mess is less often for the summer. Usually when the doody hits the fan there, things just end up cancelling because the delays rapidly exceed even the 2 hour extension. Fine for line holders with pay protection, sucks big donkey nuts for reserves that find themselves working 12 hour days for 4 hours credit because they have no pay protection.
#16
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 110
I'm calling it! A couple of 30 minutes over 18 months. You're much more likely to loose flying than be extended. Pay protection is a wonderful thing. I'm LGA based, and the JFK experience may vary, but i've not personally experienced much of the delays there.. heard the holding instructions many times though! 

As usual though *your experience may vary*
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
You're close... unforeseen delays (such as an ATC delay, WX enroute, etc.) do not require an extension, and therefore no PIC concurrence.
(Caveat - unless the last leg of a duty day is delayed after signing the "fit for duty" block certification. This also requires coordination with the company. (117.19)
Also, the PIC can be investigated if he refuses to accept an FDP extension. 117 provides no protection from such. http://www3.alpa.org/portals/alpa/co...amsters357.pdf
(Caveat - unless the last leg of a duty day is delayed after signing the "fit for duty" block certification. This also requires coordination with the company. (117.19)
Also, the PIC can be investigated if he refuses to accept an FDP extension. 117 provides no protection from such. http://www3.alpa.org/portals/alpa/co...amsters357.pdf
Last edited by HighFlight; 06-16-2017 at 10:36 PM.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Arrgh Jay
You're close... unforeseen delays (such as an ATC delay, WX enroute, etc.) do not require an extension, and therefore no PIC concurrence.
(Caveat - unless the last leg of a duty day is delayed after signing the "fit for duty" block certification. This also requires coordination with the company. (117.19)
Also, the PIC can be investigated if he refuses to accept an FDP extension. 117 provides no protection from such. http://www3.alpa.org/portals/alpa/co...amsters357.pdf
(Caveat - unless the last leg of a duty day is delayed after signing the "fit for duty" block certification. This also requires coordination with the company. (117.19)
Also, the PIC can be investigated if he refuses to accept an FDP extension. 117 provides no protection from such. http://www3.alpa.org/portals/alpa/co...amsters357.pdf
Beyond that 30 minute window, you absolutely must have both parties' concurrence.
Second point, um what. Of course the FDP extension would happen on the last leg. It certainly doesn't occur on the first leg.
Thirdly, you need to re-read that letter and comprehend it. No one is going to pressure me by threatening an 'investigation' lol.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



