Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Could Endeavor Air be sold to SkyWest? >

Could Endeavor Air be sold to SkyWest?

Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Could Endeavor Air be sold to SkyWest?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2019 | 06:14 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
I think this SkyWest buying 9E thing is a bunch of hooey anyway, so I'm not worried. I am curious, though, because I don't see the following in the contract.

What would keep an acquiring company from buying 9E, not merging the lists, and letting operational performance at 9E (like maintenance or OCC-based performance, for recent example) degrade to the point that our flying isn't renewed? Maintenance is as good as the budget will take it, as is starting with enough fuel to make prudent operational decisions off the gate.
You'd have to take a deep dive but essentially if they buy us they are saying they can't wait to give their pilots our contract under alpa. Day before purchase, theyre whatever they are, day after purchase, congrads you're now a union pilot take a lanyard and see you for pizza at recurrent.

Union contracts of any ilk, dont have any control over how idiot managers run the business. If they want to plow it in, they can, hard. If the company ceases to exist our contract is meaningless. It takes months to tank a company, and the airplanes won't be guaranteed to skywest, nor would delta ever forgive skywest for that disruption.

I don't know what you're talking about with gas and prudent decisions. You're the PIC.
Reply
Old 02-10-2019 | 06:16 PM
  #52  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
Can you speak for all DTW pilots on a question from a humble NYC pilot: why in the hell does every dtw pilot beam with pride because they got a few more pounds of poop stuffed in the cockpit trash bag? On a whole you guys aren't happy until the trash stands up on its own, and cant be removed from the cockpit without piles of crap falling out of it. Ok, I'll take my answers off air and thanks!
Well we are tired of dealing with all the trash that gets sent to Michigan from Canada so we figure we should spread the wealth....
OK joke aside I just never saw a need to replace a bag that was all paper ( I don't use tobacco and VERY rarely eat anything in the cockpit) until the end of the day... I hate when I've flown 1 leg to JFK and the cleaners rip the bag away with 2 ounces of paper in it (and haven't even finished cleaning up the scraps from the flight) and now I need to track down a new plastic bag to further pollute the landfills eventually. Perhaps we should have an hour of required recurrent devoted to Stu M.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 01:34 AM
  #53  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Our captains have direct control over that part of the operation. If we don't feel we have enough, pick up the phone and get more. If they won't give it to you (now this is of course within a reasonable context) then you don't sign the release and don't release the brake. Captain 101... FO's are you actually paying attention or just adding up your logbooks? I will say in 14+ years, I've only had to ask for more fuel about a dozen times... most had to do with a former dispatcher nicknamed gerbil.
Eh, I know that we don't have a problem with it here right now. Our airline isn't cheap in that department.

Where I was trying to go with this (and I'm done with it after this one) is if some slick management group wanted to buy us, undermine our airline operationally, and ultimately take the flying, then they could do it while still adhering to our contract. Kinda like... y'know, legacy ASA.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 04:01 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 116
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
Eh, I know that we don't have a problem with it here right now. Our airline isn't cheap in that department.

Where I was trying to go with this (and I'm done with it after this one) is if some slick management group wanted to buy us, undermine our airline operationally, and ultimately take the flying, then they could do it while still adhering to our contract. Kinda like... y'know, legacy ASA.
Keep in mind IF skywest bought us, IF we somehow stayed separate, IF they could shut us down quickly and not incur the wraith of Delta, they'd still have to bid the flying like everyone else. So that slick group of manager types would be beaten, set on fire, and whizzed on by the investors. You can set small piles of money on fire, I've learned, but even if corporate America if you burn the whole cash pile you need your affairs in order.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 04:14 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Default

Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
Argenbright wouldn't pay what delta wanted and no one else would take the failing company. Delta goes from whole owner to stakeholder so DGS doesn't collapse when Argenbright finds out how badly run DGS is. That stake will be reduced over time, and maybe in time Delta the public company will release more information on the transaction. Argen is a private company so I'd guess 3-5 years delta has some small partnership.

You can buy into the flowery language if you want. Delta traded a bad asset and volunteered to keep themselves tied to it, because no one is buying DGS as a viable business. Meanwhile Delta gets to take important airports like RDU and turn them mainline, and I'd expect within 1-3 years Argenbright is running all tsa operations in ATL, DTW and MSP (delta side) and a handful of others.

Bonuses, we lose DGS and a private firm fixes some of the nonsense, and possibly the blue badge wearing smurfs get unloaded for something less badly run at a couple key airports. Worse case, Argenbright does what they are most famous for. What's the worse that could happen?
I miss the skinny Santa Claus looking mainline marshaller in KPIT. All fired and replaced with DGS. Those guys had 30 + years
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 06:11 AM
  #56  
JSDL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Round Two
Default

Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
I miss the skinny Santa Claus looking mainline marshaller in KPIT. All fired and replaced with DGS. Those guys had 30 + years
That dude was good. He ran circles around everyone else without breaking a sweat.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 06:20 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
I think this SkyWest buying 9E thing is a bunch of hooey anyway, so I'm not worried. I am curious, though, because I don't see the following in the contract.

What would keep an acquiring company from buying 9E, not merging the lists, and letting operational performance at 9E (like maintenance or OCC-based performance, for recent example) degrade to the point that our flying isn't renewed? Maintenance is as good as the budget will take it, as is starting with enough fuel to make prudent operational decisions off the gate.
The scope at 9E prevents that. Lists have to be merged if 9E changes ownership. SkyWest won't buy any carrier with that requirement.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 06:27 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dingus
Recent events are showing that Delta Air Lines wants to limit its liability. The sale of Delta Global Services shows us this. All they're getting from owning their own regional, Endeavor Air, is more liability. SkyWest offers them a better product with no union costs, better fuel economy at 250 knots, and more calls for ride reports and ramp access requests on 121.5. I think it's likely that they're in talks to sell Endeavor Air to SkyWest at this very moment. It could be L-ASA/ExpressJet all over again around here.
Complete nonsense.

Delta runs a near perfect operation with little to no cancellations.

Skywest is one of the most vulnerable regionals. Their no union and poor pay means they will have trouble staffing. All legacy carriers contracts with regionals have “performance” in them.

Endeavor will be just fine by themselves and the last DCI to go.
Reply
Old 02-11-2019 | 07:27 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Complete nonsense.

Delta runs a near perfect operation with little to no cancellations.

Skywest is one of the most vulnerable regionals. Their no union and poor pay means they will have trouble staffing. All legacy carriers contracts with regionals have “performance” in them.

Endeavor will be just fine by themselves and the last DCI to go.
Sounds like every WO prior to 9E, until someone does the math and realizes they can do the same flight for equal or less CASM with a mainline 717 crew, why then continue the contract with 9E? Past precedent is not in your favor...
Reply
Old 02-12-2019 | 09:16 AM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 107
Default

Why is this thread still alive? This is weird.... Moving on

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
amcnd
SkyWest
42
02-17-2019 01:52 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
yahooair
SkyWest
11
08-11-2016 07:39 AM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices