![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 1496526)
First off u don't have a clue what ur talking about. 7 months off doesn't mean he jumped the fence it means he was displaced. And bragging about spending time with his family? That's the only glimmer of hope in this industry. Had he been bragging about getting high and playing video games that would be another story. Nice try 9e silver boy.
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1496543)
If that's the colgan consensus, I'd love it on the record.
I predict a massive exodus of FOs so severe the company will not survive. The dominoes have begun to fall. Very few downgraded CAs will stay. Attrition will out-pace aircraft returns and Delta will be forced to close the operation. |
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1496537)
The point is that you have "moved on" and this topic is "Toxic". You could say the sky is blue, and it would be argued. Anyone starting with "7 months off" and then defended by "family" doesn't bode well. I asked my wife this question hypothetically, and she was livid for reference. Only the bottom 4-6 Pre-Merger CJC guys hold reserve currently, the rest hold lines, In the last few months to the tune of 14-18 days off depending on bid. This is great news, unless you see that pre-merger 9E guys are on reserve and now displaced to FO with 11 days off and far more longevity to the most junior LH.
This battle is about to go nuclear, as advice, I would avoid it and move on. Just $.02 knowing what is approaching. |
What really makes no sense is that 2nd year pay at many other regional is close to max out pay at Endeavor. I really don't even understand what there is to ponder about, if you are flying the 200 or 900 seems that any regional would scoop you up without hesitation. I can see how a 6 or 7 year FO would just say F@ck it though im going down with the ship.
|
Originally Posted by Jamers
(Post 1496552)
Pretty much.
I predict a massive exodus of FOs so severe the company will not survive. The dominoes have begun to fall. Very few downgraded CAs will stay. Attrition will out-pace aircraft returns and Delta will be forced to close the operation. |
anyone know what pinnacle's current attrition rate is? (number and seat)
|
The last I heard attrition is 18% for the year, when they had planned on 17%, so it's pretty much right on track according to the bean counters. In 2014, attrition is forcast to be 20% (some of the increase due to flows and SSP) and it looks like the first steps to ensuring that happens have started to take place. This 13-02 was supposed to balance out the Captains and First Officers and start forcing people over to the 900. However, I think it's just going to cause more FO's to leave, forcing further fleet reductions and downgrades to cover the right seat.
|
Originally Posted by CAPTAINPCL
(Post 1496581)
The last I heard attrition is 18% for the year, when they had planned on 17%, so it's pretty much right on track according to the bean counters. In 2014, attrition is forcast to be 20% (some of the increase due to flows and SSP) and it looks like the first steps to ensuring that happens have started to take place. This 13-02 was supposed to balance out the Captains and First Officers and start forcing people over to the 900. However, I think it's just going to cause more FO's to leave, forcing further fleet reductions and downgrades to cover the right seat.
|
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1496605)
Hmmm where have we seen this show before???? Oh that's right I saw this show when I lived in CVG. What was that place called, OH I wish I could remember.
|
I think the most important thing to remember is this is just the FIRST realignment. Remember they revised this one because they didn't want to forecast training events like 11-09 fiasco.
Next realignment is after the new year in which you will see a TON more downgrades. |
So...when is this thing supposed to be published?
|
Originally Posted by Past V1
(Post 1496653)
So...when is this thing supposed to be published?
But, the initial came out yesterday and the final with class dates comes out on the 11th. |
Since Saabs asked, it is completely ludicrous. The wording was quite clear that no XJ/9L could be awarded or displaced a left seat unless 9E maintains 541 and 95 seats respectively. They are below that. In fact, since the RJ quotas are only for the XJ/9E groups, if both are below their quotas, then it should mean a downgrade for every single 9L pilot. That's the intent of those quotas. The first 641 positions on the -200 are 9E and XJ. 541 and 100 ratio. Only if there are more than 641 positions available on the -200 then it goes in seniority order for all three groups including 9L. So yes it is beyond ridiculous that 9L still maintains as many left seats as they have while XJ and especially 9E guys dating all the way back to 2006 are now getting downgraded well below their own ratio.
As for 9E, I understand why the CAs are sticking around. The pay sucks but it's still livable. The SSP is slowly starting to come around and interviews should follow. But for 9E FOs, why are you still showing up to work? What's your excuse? I thought the general consensus was to take the 6 grand and run. Everyone will be capped at 4th yr FO pay of 38ish/hr. No FO will see a SSP Delta interview if they haven't already been a Captain. So if your pay is limited and there is no Delta SSP, then why stick around? The final result is inevitable - it has been ever since they announced an end state of 81 planes. FOs have left but I'm surprised more haven't done so. So it's not the money and certainly not the future (Delta) so why stick? Bases? Compass offers the same and they have quicker movement with guaranteed Captains leaving for the Delta flow. All you get is one year of pain and the 2nd year you'll be back to what you are making now as a capped FO. Or try Virgin/Spirit/JetBlue they have taken tons of FOs without TPIC and quite a few without internal recommendations. Heck, even apply to Delta/United/AA you have nothing to lose. I'm surprised 9E still gets flights out. There should be a mass exodus of FOs on a daily basis to the point that place comes to a standstill and implodes. There is no future for a 9E FO. Why delay the inevitable? |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1496827)
No FO will see a SSP Delta interview if they haven't already been a Captain.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1496827)
Since Saabs asked, it is completely ludicrous. The wording was quite clear that no XJ/9L could be awarded or displaced a left seat unless 9E maintains 541 and 95 seats respectively. They are below that. In fact, since the RJ quotas are only for the XJ/9E groups, if both are below their quotas, then it should mean a downgrade for every single 9L pilot. That's the intent of those quotas. The first 641 positions on the -200 are 9E and XJ. 541 and 100 ratio. Only if there are more than 641 positions available on the -200 then it goes in seniority order for all three groups including 9L. So yes it is beyond ridiculous that 9L still maintains as many left seats as they have while XJ and especially 9E guys dating all the way back to 2006 are now getting downgraded well below their own ratio.
As for 9E, I understand why the CAs are sticking around. The pay sucks but it's still livable. The SSP is slowly starting to come around and interviews should follow. But for 9E FOs, why are you still showing up to work? What's your excuse? I thought the general consensus was to take the 6 grand and run. Everyone will be capped at 4th yr FO pay of 38ish/hr. No FO will see a SSP Delta interview if they haven't already been a Captain. So if your pay is limited and there is no Delta SSP, then why stick around? The final result is inevitable - it has been ever since they announced an end state of 81 planes. FOs have left but I'm surprised more haven't done so. So it's not the money and certainly not the future (Delta) so why stick? Bases? Compass offers the same and they have quicker movement with guaranteed Captains leaving for the Delta flow. All you get is one year of pain and the 2nd year you'll be back to what you are making now as a capped FO. Or try Virgin/Spirit/JetBlue they have taken tons of FOs without TPIC and quite a few without internal recommendations. Heck, even apply to Delta/United/AA you have nothing to lose. I'm surprised 9E still gets flights out. There should be a mass exodus of FOs on a daily basis to the point that place comes to a standstill and implodes. There is no future for a 9E FO. Why delay the inevitable? It seems that wanting to leave and getting an offer to leave are not working as easily as planned for some. |
Originally Posted by swamp
(Post 1496833)
Sh1t, the union just put out a clarification email about the SSP, when our number is called for the SSP interview, we must be a current captain. The "once a captain" was a myth, unlike the no 4 year degree "Vault letter". Anyone with a seniority beyond 500 will more than likely not see an SSP interview, unless Delta miraculously does a mass interview for the 1200 current CA, or if Delta extends the SSP to FOs, which is dumb they didn't do in the first place. So the current SSP only benefits the top Captains that never met the quals to go to Delta on their own merit.. What a joke.
iv. be on the Pinnacle pilot seniority list at the time the opportunity to participate in the SSP is offered and thereafter remain on the seniority list until the date the pilot actually participates in the SSP, v. either: 1) hold a Captain position at Pinnacle, or 2) have previously held a Captain position on the Pinnacle, Mesaba or Colgan pilot seniority list and be on an approved leave of absence from Pinnacle and not have accepted employment as a pilot while on leave at any of the following U.S. air carriers: American, United, US Airways, Southwest, JetBlue, Alaska, Hawaiian, FedEx, UPS, Virgin America, or Spirit. The intent there makes it sound like only Captains who are basically on a leave. Once you take a leave, you "previously held your Captain seat" but not anymore since you are on leave. The "and" portion of the statement above makes it so. But apparently the union interpretation of that was to include anyone who was previously a Captain and that is not true. But you are correct that from all indications, Delta will only take current Captains through the SSP. |
Originally Posted by swamp
(Post 1496833)
Sh1t, the union just put out a clarification email about the SSP, when our number is called for the SSP interview, we must be a current captain. The "once a captain" was a myth, unlike the no 4 year degree "Vault letter". Anyone with a seniority beyond 500 will more than likely not see an SSP interview, unless Delta miraculously does a mass interview for the 1200 current CA, or if Delta extends the SSP to FOs, which is dumb they didn't do in the first place. So the current SSP only benefits the top Captains that never met the quals to go to Delta on their own merit.. What a joke.
|
Originally Posted by swamp
(Post 1496833)
Sh1t, the union just put out a clarification email about the SSP, when our number is called for the SSP interview, we must be a current captain. The "once a captain" was a myth, unlike the no 4 year degree "Vault letter". Anyone with a seniority beyond 500 will more than likely not see an SSP interview, unless Delta miraculously does a mass interview for the 1200 current CA, or if Delta extends the SSP to FOs, which is dumb they didn't do in the first place. So the current SSP only benefits the top Captains that never met the quals to go to Delta on their own merit.. What a joke.
|
Originally Posted by spaaks
(Post 1496884)
are you sad now that y'all voted yes and started the lowering of the bar at the regionals because mother D pulled a fast one on you?
|
"hey rookie, come back when you are done flying traffic watch"
That's gonna leave a mark. |
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/6209...got-real-o.gif
This ish just got real girlfriend!!! On a side note, traffic watch probably payz better than being a three striper on the heavy niner… 4 life. |
Ken, is there an explanation why we (9E) doesn't get to fill our quotas? Mind you I have read the emails but still don't understand why we don't get our CA spots before it goes in seniority order. Furthermore, is anyone internally waving the BS flag disputing this?
|
Originally Posted by IBPilot
(Post 1496939)
hey rookie, come back when you are done flying traffic watch and actually have enough hours to get hired by a regional. If you can't see the difference between 9e's concessionary contract (bankruptcy/judge imposed anyways with worse terms/death) vs a concessionary contract because you "might" get more flying, you shouldn't have the lives of 50 plus people in your hands. Stick to traffic watch please.
Here's an example: Q: To be eligible for the SSP, you must be a Captain, correct? Does that mean F/Os will not be eligible? A: No! First Officers are eligible to be hired by Delta as part of the monthly hiring commitment (that is, one third of the overall monthly commitment) outside of the SSP, so First Officers directly stand to benefit from the Bridge Agreement and will not have to wait until all Captains have been considered. All pilots on the seniority list at the time of ratification will be entitled to an interview under the SSP. To be eligible to attend that interview under the SSP, you must be, or have been, a Captain at Pinnacle (or on leave holding a Captain position) at the time of your selection. As Pinnacle Captains move on to Delta, that will create upgrade opportunities for current First Officers to upgrade to Captain and become eligible for the seniority-based SSP. As noted above, in addition to the hiring that will take place under the SSP, Delta has reserved the right to hire 1/3 of the monthly commitment from Pinnacle outside of seniority order, so current First Officers will be hired without having to wait to be eligible for the SSP. The last part "or on leave holding a Captain position" is correct. The middle part "or have been" is a LIE. This was to bait n' hook for downgraded CAs and future downgraded pilots to still think they have a chance. Here's Delta's wording: 1) hold a Captain position at Pinnacle, or 2) have previously held a Captain position on the Pinnacle, Mesaba or Colgan pilot seniority list and be on an approved leave of absence from Pinnacle |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1496991)
But you can't deny that you guys were lied/duped into the POS that is the SSP.
Here's an example: "You must be" for Captain is correct. The last part "or on leave holding a Captain position" is correct. The middle part "or have been" is a LIE. This was to bait n' hook for downgraded CAs and future downgraded pilots to still think they have a chance. Here's Delta's wording: It's clear only current Captains or leave Captains are eligible, not downgraded CAs that are now FOs. So that having been said, if 9E pilots that are not Captains - the FOs - can't even participate in the SSP then what makes anyone think they will hire RJ FOs from 9E outside the SSP? If they wanted to consider FOs they certainly could within the SSP. Take the hint though that through the SSP they only want Captains, then you can be fairly certain no 9E FO will be hired outside the SSP. |
It's because its not a vacancy. Your dealing with displacements. Colgan couldn't displace PNC but they could displace Mesaba because Mesaba was over there number and they did. PNCL did not get displaced by colgan that got displaced by more senior PNCL pilots from JFK. Remember this was a net loss of captain slots on the 200. Colgan was able to keep their seats they had because of how seniority works.
once you have a seat its yours until someone can kick you out by a displacement. With the BLOCH ISL it addressed quotas and myself including thought that it meant you had to maintain those levels but that's only really applies when we increase staffing. If there was a vacancy for 200 positions all would go to PNCL because their below their quota. Just like how junior some of the 900 slots went to mesaba because of the quota. In reality though were all just buying time. We are going to 81 airplanes and the company is in deep. They still don't know how to fix this mess. Also remember to keep in eye on the mesaba quota and see how junior the 900 slots go. However those are 2004 hires. Its amazing to me how one may think they got screwed in integration to later find out they made out pretty good. |
Originally Posted by jamesd
(Post 1497015)
It's because its not a vacancy. Your dealing with displacements. Colgan couldn't displace PNC but they could displace Mesaba because Mesaba was over there number and they did. PNCL did not get displaced by colgan that got displaced by more senior PNCL pilots from JFK. Remember this was a net loss of captain slots on the 200. Colgan was able to keep their seats they had because of how seniority works.
once you have a seat its yours until someone can kick you out by a displacement. With the BLOCH ISL it addressed quotas and myself including thought that it meant you had to maintain those levels but that's only really applies when we increase staffing. If there was a vacancy for 200 positions all would go to PNCL because their below their quota. Just like how junior some of the 900 slots went to mesaba because of the quota. In reality though were all just buying time. We are going to 81 airplanes and the company is in deep. They still don't know how to fix this mess. Also remember to keep in eye on the mesaba quota and see how junior the 900 slots go. However those are 2004 hires. Its amazing to me how one may think they got screwed in integration to later find out they made out pretty good. En ingles, por favor? En anglais, si'l vous plait? |
Originally Posted by IBPilot
(Post 1496939)
hey rookie, come back when you are done flying traffic watch and actually have enough hours to get hired by a regional. If you can't see the difference between 9e's concessionary contract (bankruptcy/judge imposed anyways with worse terms/death) vs a concessionary contract because you "might" get more flying, you shouldn't have the lives of 50 plus people in your hands. Stick to traffic watch please.
The "Bendover" contract is a direct result of the years past due Republic contract plus Mesa and the small longevity of Compass and GOatJets. Now PSA gets to try to match it, next is Espressjet then SkyWest will... The 85% at Bendover deserve blame for voting with anything besides a dirty butthole but I digress.... |
Originally Posted by jamesd
(Post 1497015)
It's because its not a vacancy. Your dealing with displacements. Colgan couldn't displace PNC but they could displace Mesaba because Mesaba was over there number and they did. PNCL did not get displaced by colgan that got displaced by more senior PNCL pilots from JFK. Remember this was a net loss of captain slots on the 200. Colgan was able to keep their seats they had because of how seniority works.
once you have a seat its yours until someone can kick you out by a displacement. With the BLOCH ISL it addressed quotas and myself including thought that it meant you had to maintain those levels but that's only really applies when we increase staffing. If there was a vacancy for 200 positions all would go to PNCL because their below their quota. Just like how junior some of the 900 slots went to mesaba because of the quota. In reality though were all just buying time. We are going to 81 airplanes and the company is in deep. They still don't know how to fix this mess. Also remember to keep in eye on the mesaba quota and see how junior the 900 slots go. However those are 2004 hires. Its amazing to me how one may think they got screwed in integration to later find out they made out pretty good. Good to know that SENIORITY works that way when 07 Colgan keep captain spots with NO AIRPLANES (scaring the crap out of the 7 year FOs' having to fly with them), while 06 Pinnacle and 05 Mesaba are all sent packing.... |
I have no dog in this fight but you guys realize that date of hire means very little in a SLI. Colgan pilots didn't ask for this and 07 Colgan hires went to Colgan before Q400s even existed there. Pinnacle came in with their horrible management and Colgan no longer exists because of it. So point all the fingers you want but it's not their fault. Also don't forget the 2008 Colgan hires that lost almost 30% seniority. I don't see them complaining.
|
Originally Posted by Past V1
(Post 1496653)
So...when is this thing supposed to be published?
But, the initial came out yesterday and the final with class dates comes out on the 11th. |
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1497061)
I have no dog in this fight but you guys realize that date of hire means very little in a SLI. Colgan pilots didn't ask for this and 07 Colgan hires went to Colgan before Q400s even existed there. Pinnacle came in with their horrible management and Colgan no longer exists because of it. So point all the fingers you want but it's not their fault. Also don't forget the 2008 Colgan hires that lost almost 30% seniority. I don't see them complaining.
|
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1497061)
I have no dog in this fight but you guys realize that date of hire means very little in a SLI. Colgan pilots didn't ask for this and 07 Colgan hires went to Colgan before Q400s even existed there. Pinnacle came in with their horrible management and Colgan no longer exists because of it. So point all the fingers you want but it's not their fault. Also don't forget the 2008 Colgan hires that lost almost 30% seniority. I don't see them complaining.
Colgan To ensure every pilot would remain within 3 percent of their current pre- merger seniority rank, the Colgan pilots’ proposal creates 30 blocks, each containing 88 pilots from the three groups. Pilots would be placed within each block according to a ratio (1 Colgan to 2.5 Pinnacle to 2 Mesaba pilots), a ratio mirroring the size of the respective groups. Additionally, the Colgan group proposes that (1) no pilot be displaced from their position as a result of the integration and (2) any furloughs resulting from pre-July 1, 2010 scheduled fleet reductions be borne by the pre-July, 2010 pilot group. The Colgan representatives say the only reason there were not more furloughs by Mesaba was that Pinnacle Corporation, following the Mesaba purchase, transferred Colgan flying (for US Airways) to Mesaba Saabs at LaGuardia. In this way, says Colgan, Colgan Air helped save Mesaba jobs. The Colgan group seeks to retain to all pilots the type of bidding power they had at their pre-merger airlines. But this type of parity, an attempt to share the enhanced conditions more equally, is achieved at the demonstrable expense of Status and Category considerations, taken in light of reasonable pre-merger expectations. The overwhelming majority of Colgan pilots who, pre-merger, had career expectations limited to flying turboprop aircraft would, following the integration, achieve bidding power into aircraft and pay scales well beyond any that could have reasonably been contemplated prior to the merger. |
Originally Posted by Past V1
(Post 1497068)
No not joking...I've looked on the website and have found nothing. Is it only posted in ops? If so, when will they post it online so I can see it? I won't be in ops for a while. Thanks!
If you don't see it listed there, I would clear the cache on your browser and try again. If that doesn't work pm me. |
Originally Posted by NoLightOff
(Post 1497061)
I have no dog in this fight but you guys realize that date of hire means very little in a SLI. Colgan pilots didn't ask for this and 07 Colgan hires went to Colgan before Q400s even existed there. Pinnacle came in with their horrible management and Colgan no longer exists because of it. So point all the fingers you want but it's not their fault. Also don't forget the 2008 Colgan hires that lost almost 30% seniority. I don't see them complaining.
So wether you were first or last on the Colgan list none of them have any right to complain, and especially the 2008 hires. Personally straight DOH would have been more then fair to that group. |
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 1497106)
If Pinnacle had not purchased Colgan they were going out of business... That's fact straight from Colgan, they had no money left.
So wether you were first or last on the Colgan list none of them have any right to complain, and especially the 2008 hires. Personally straight DOH would have been more then fair to that group. |
Originally Posted by Past V1
(Post 1497068)
No not joking...I've looked on the website and have found nothing. Is it only posted in ops? If so, when will they post it online so I can see it? I won't be in ops for a while. Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 1497109)
The fraud ALPA committed on the TWA pilots led to McCaskill-Bond, which prevented you from getting anything other than an equipment merger, even though Colgan was an alter ego of 9E from 07-10.
|
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1497084)
odds are about 85% voted yes for this s-bag contract so yes I still blame them as well. Now a downgrade means you need a second income to support a family. And every other (see PSA, Eagle, ExpressJet) regional is being put in a position to match that crap.
|
Originally Posted by jethikoki
(Post 1497190)
But does McCaskill-Bond apply to a Major with a regional?
Pinnacle is a worst case scenario, they got all of the Colgan pilots, but none of the Colgan airplanes. This could easily happen at a mainline if the union isn't careful. A separate union like SWAPA can craftily side step around it carefully, whereas ALPA has no choice due to ALPA merger policy. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands