Endeavor (9E) interviews and offers?
#151
Really? There is no training in checking events? Only for type rides/certificates. What's that big TTP column on a PC? there is no "script" for an oral or a PC. Whatever you need to do to get 2 precision, 2 non precision and a v1 cut. There is no "script" for an oral. The company/FED finds the check airman's way of doing it fair and competent, he gets signed off. We may be "checking" but we are also instructors, if the guys I touch don't learn something from me every time, I'm not doing my job. I have yet to have anyone in 3 years ***** about my orals or ride, or complain that it was unfair. 99% of them say "hey that was cool I really didn't know that I learned some stuff today!" That's better than going home with just sweaty palms and a bunch of "sats" in a column. And I'm not gonna change it.
A. First and foremost, there should be a script. It doesn't have to spell out every detail, but should be pretty close. On our LOEs, breaking from script is an event that will get an instructor a slap on the wrist. MVs are closer to what 9E did, and it's up to the instructor to get through the maneuvers in the most efficient manner to get the check over with and get on to the training portion that completes the second half of the sim session when on MV day in recurrent (we do 2 days of recurrent every 9 months- day 1 is all training, the first half of day 2 is manuevers validation (MV) or line oriented evaluation (LOE), and the second half of day 2 is more training). The training portion always comprises of things that have happened on the line and things that guys have had difficulty with in the sim recently.
B. TTP is a designated break from the checking to bring a pilot back into standards. It is delineated by the instructor. That is the only training that should be done in the midst of a checking event.
C. We don't do face to face orals anymore, but when an instructor broke from the specific topics they were allowed to ask, they had to stop, state this was no longer checking and something helpful to know, and then state when checking began again.
D. I know you guys aren't AQP, and that makes a gigantic difference all in its own.
Poor training does not give an excuse to randomly and in a somewhat masked manner intersperse training into a checking event... plus just to fill time. It's the culture at 9E, and it's awful. Get the check over with, then have some fun/teach if you're going to do that. Otherwise the checking stress is much higher and the learning is significantly diminished.
#152
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Really? There is no training in checking events? Only for type rides/certificates. What's that big TTP column on a PC? there is no "script" for an oral or a PC. Whatever you need to do to get 2 precision, 2 non precision and a v1 cut. There is no "script" for an oral. The company/FED finds the check airman's way of doing it fair and competent, he gets signed off. We may be "checking" but we are also instructors, if the guys I touch don't learn something from me every time, I'm not doing my job. I have yet to have anyone in 3 years ***** about my orals or ride, or complain that it was unfair. 99% of them say "hey that was cool I really didn't know that I learned some stuff today!" That's better than going home with just sweaty palms and a bunch of "sats" in a column. And I'm not gonna change it.
#2. You know people only say "99% of them say "hey that was cool I really didn't know that I learned some stuff today!" because they're kissing butt right? No one means it.
#153
Like I said, you continue to show how immature the "training" program is at 9E.
A. First and foremost, there should be a script. It doesn't have to spell out every detail, but should be pretty close. On our LOEs, breaking from script is an event that will get an instructor a slap on the wrist. MVs are closer to what 9E did, and it's up to the instructor to get through the maneuvers in the most efficient manner to get the check over with and get to the training portion that completes the second half of the sim session when on MV day in recurrent. The training portion always comprises of things that have happened on the line and things that guys have had difficulty with in the sim recently.
B. TTP is a designated break from the checking to bring a pilot back into standards. It is delineated by the instructor. That is the only training that should be done in a checking event.
C. We don't do face to face orals anymore, but when an instructor broke from the specific topics they were allowed to ask, they had to stop, state this was no longer checking and something helpful to know, and then state when checking began again.
D. I know you guys aren't AQP, and that makes a gigantic difference all in its own.
Poor training does not give an excuse to randomly and in a somewhat masked manner intersperse training into a checking event... plus just to fill time. It's the culture at 9E, and it's awful. Get the check over with, then have some fun/teach if you're going to do that. Otherwise the checking stress is much higher and the learning is significantly diminished.
A. First and foremost, there should be a script. It doesn't have to spell out every detail, but should be pretty close. On our LOEs, breaking from script is an event that will get an instructor a slap on the wrist. MVs are closer to what 9E did, and it's up to the instructor to get through the maneuvers in the most efficient manner to get the check over with and get to the training portion that completes the second half of the sim session when on MV day in recurrent. The training portion always comprises of things that have happened on the line and things that guys have had difficulty with in the sim recently.
B. TTP is a designated break from the checking to bring a pilot back into standards. It is delineated by the instructor. That is the only training that should be done in a checking event.
C. We don't do face to face orals anymore, but when an instructor broke from the specific topics they were allowed to ask, they had to stop, state this was no longer checking and something helpful to know, and then state when checking began again.
D. I know you guys aren't AQP, and that makes a gigantic difference all in its own.
Poor training does not give an excuse to randomly and in a somewhat masked manner intersperse training into a checking event... plus just to fill time. It's the culture at 9E, and it's awful. Get the check over with, then have some fun/teach if you're going to do that. Otherwise the checking stress is much higher and the learning is significantly diminished.
#154
Have fun with your "my airline is better than yours" lovefest. I gotta get some sleep, have to get up early to be a d*ck to someone and try to make them bust their PC....
You got a problem with a specific instructor, take it to him or let me know why. Don't go acting all tough when you've never met me or been through one of my events.
#155
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: The Parlor
Posts: 1,243
Really? There is no training in checking events? Only for type rides/certificates. What's that big TTP column on a PC? there is no "script" for an oral or a PC. Whatever you need to do to get 2 precision, 2 non precision and a v1 cut. There is no "script" for an oral. The company/FED finds the check airman's way of doing it fair and competent, he gets signed off. We may be "checking" but we are also instructors, if the guys I touch don't learn something from me every time, I'm not doing my job. I have yet to have anyone in 3 years ***** about my orals or ride, or complain that it was unfair. 99% of them say "hey that was cool I really didn't know that I learned some stuff today!" That's better than going home with just sweaty palms and a bunch of "sats" in a column. And I'm not gonna change it.
#158
Last I checked, my paycheck said "endeavor" and I was chosen by "endeavor" managers to teach according to "endeavor" policies as blessed by the MEM FSDO. When/if I/we get a paycheck that says Delta, and I/we are blessed by the ATL FSDO and Delta managers, I will gladly do it according to their script.
I was explaining to you how the methods you describe are signatures of an immature training department, which you've continued to try to justify now. The fact is that it is far from optimum and ignores many fundamentals of learning and checking that have now been in place for more than 20 years at mature training departments.
#159
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Really? There is no training in checking events? Only for type rides/certificates. What's that big TTP column on a PC? there is no "script" for an oral or a PC. Whatever you need to do to get 2 precision, 2 non precision and a v1 cut. There is no "script" for an oral. The company/FED finds the check airman's way of doing it fair and competent, he gets signed off. We may be "checking" but we are also instructors, if the guys I touch don't learn something from me every time, I'm not doing my job. I have yet to have anyone in 3 years ***** about my orals or ride, or complain that it was unfair. 99% of them say "hey that was cool I really didn't know that I learned some stuff today!" That's better than going home with just sweaty palms and a bunch of "sats" in a column. And I'm not gonna change it.
#160
You're were arguing earlier that the methods were fine and justifying learning people stuff in the midst of a check and that you have free reign on how to administer the PC. Now you've back pedaled to this.
I was explaining to you how the methods you describe are signatures of an immature training department, which you've continued to try to justify now. The fact is that it is far from optimum and ignores many fundamentals of learning and checking that have now been in place for more than 20 years at mature training departments.
I was explaining to you how the methods you describe are signatures of an immature training department, which you've continued to try to justify now. The fact is that it is far from optimum and ignores many fundamentals of learning and checking that have now been in place for more than 20 years at mature training departments.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post