Question for Endeavor pilots
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: CA
Posts: 534
Let's paint Delta on the side of their planes, have them fly our pax to our destinations, give them new checklists like ours, make them follow the "Delta way", and...get this...make them interview and start over to "officially work for us"! Go 'Merica!
#22
I also think there is something with the fuel being considered "contaminated" when it comes off of an airplane. I do not know that for a fact, but I would be willing to bet that there are some EPA concerns, and probably a whole bureaucratic paperwork nightmare to be followed to have that fuel then considered "safe" for use again.... Probably cheaper to burn it on the ramp, sad as that sounds...
#23
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
I also think there is something with the fuel being considered "contaminated" when it comes off of an airplane. I do not know that for a fact, but I would be willing to bet that there are some EPA concerns, and probably a whole bureaucratic paperwork nightmare to be followed to have that fuel then considered "safe" for use again.... Probably cheaper to burn it on the ramp, sad as that sounds...
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: B737 F/O
Posts: 425
I also think there is something with the fuel being considered "contaminated" when it comes off of an airplane. I do not know that for a fact, but I would be willing to bet that there are some EPA concerns, and probably a whole bureaucratic paperwork nightmare to be followed to have that fuel then considered "safe" for use again.... Probably cheaper to burn it on the ramp, sad as that sounds...
Once you defuel an airplane, all the fuel in that tanker must then go into the company's aircraft that you de-fueled from. Say you have a truck with several thousand gallons or so in it and you would do a defuel from a 9E airplane, you would need that truck to only work 9E flights until it is empty. That can get to be a massive pain at small stations/places that don't see many flights from the affected carrier. At my ex-employer, if the fuel vendor personnel really want to follow the rules, the fueler should call their tank farm people to do a density test on the fuel in the truck immediately before de-fueling into it. Plus, I always found it funny how many of my coworkers had difficulty with the paperwork/basic math. The truck meter only counts upward, whether the fuel is coming in or out, so your gallons 'through' the meter no longer equalled the amount 'out' of the tank.
Apologies if I bored you all to death, but just figured I'd explain the rocket surgery behind a simple process.
#25
Ex-fueler here, I don't know if this is industry wide, but what I'm describing holds true for all stations for a large company that specializes in 121 carrier fuel management.
Once you defuel an airplane, all the fuel in that tanker must then go into the company's aircraft that you de-fueled from. Say you have a truck with several thousand gallons or so in it and you would do a defuel from a 9E airplane, you would need that truck to only work 9E flights until it is empty. That can get to be a massive pain at small stations/places that don't see many flights from the affected carrier. At my ex-employer, if the fuel vendor personnel really want to follow the rules, the fueler should call their tank farm people to do a density test on the fuel in the truck immediately before de-fueling into it. Plus, I always found it funny how many of my coworkers had difficulty with the paperwork/basic math. The truck meter only counts upward, whether the fuel is coming in or out, so your gallons 'through' the meter no longer equalled the amount 'out' of the tank.
Apologies if I bored you all to death, but just figured I'd explain the rocket surgery behind a simple process.
Once you defuel an airplane, all the fuel in that tanker must then go into the company's aircraft that you de-fueled from. Say you have a truck with several thousand gallons or so in it and you would do a defuel from a 9E airplane, you would need that truck to only work 9E flights until it is empty. That can get to be a massive pain at small stations/places that don't see many flights from the affected carrier. At my ex-employer, if the fuel vendor personnel really want to follow the rules, the fueler should call their tank farm people to do a density test on the fuel in the truck immediately before de-fueling into it. Plus, I always found it funny how many of my coworkers had difficulty with the paperwork/basic math. The truck meter only counts upward, whether the fuel is coming in or out, so your gallons 'through' the meter no longer equalled the amount 'out' of the tank.
Apologies if I bored you all to death, but just figured I'd explain the rocket surgery behind a simple process.
I'll agree with the sentiment on 9E guys being more apt to single engine. I did it every flight unless I couldn't... most were of similar mindset mostly no matter how disgruntled.
It makes much more sense now that I never once saw an XJ plane do a delayed engine start. Not allowing an FO to start an engine sounds like something AA would do... It's logical that culture and mindset could carry on.
9E is also a lot less lenient on overweight landings. At DL, if we're going to be overweight going into a hub or mx station, we just land and log the VS in the logbook. A quick sign off and off we go again... none of this sitting burning gas, holding, or the like.
#26
For those that knew me back in my angry 9E days, I was a huge proponent of being a d**k and burning the place down. I hated the place, the drawn out negotiations, the displacement, low pay, you name it, I woulda b****ed about it. Looking back at my attitude and my actions (nav light cover write ups) I sincerely regret it. What did any of that accomplish? Nothing. Being pi**ed off and thinking I'm somehow "gettin back" at the company by not trying to save fuel or playing games with crew scheduling or whatever, really accomplished nothing. If I had to do it all over again, I woulda done it the right way. Instead of seeing being professional as "helping the company", I would see it for what it really is. Being professional means putting aside all the crap thats going on outside the cockpit and do the best possible job you can in it. The burn it down attitude is contagious, especially in DTW. But it's self defeating. The best attitude to have is to show up and do your job to the best of your abilities regardless of outside matters. Hopefully I'll be able to carry that attitude with me to my next airline, cause guess what? The same ****** that is happening at 9E is happening or has happened at every major airline. The company may be able to take away pay or vacation or travel benefits or whatever, but if you come to work and do a good job and take some pride in your flying, they can never take that away.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
For those that knew me back in my angry 9E days, I was a huge proponent of being a d**k and burning the place down. I hated the place, the drawn out negotiations, the displacement, low pay, you name it, I woulda b****ed about it. Looking back at my attitude and my actions (nav light cover write ups) I sincerely regret it. What did any of that accomplish? Nothing. Being pi**ed off and thinking I'm somehow "gettin back" at the company by not trying to save fuel or playing games with crew scheduling or whatever, really accomplished nothing. If I had to do it all over again, I woulda done it the right way. Instead of seeing being professional as "helping the company", I would see it for what it really is. Being professional means putting aside all the crap thats going on outside the cockpit and do the best possible job you can in it. The burn it down attitude is contagious, especially in DTW. But it's self defeating. The best attitude to have is to show up and do your job to the best of your abilities regardless of outside matters. Hopefully I'll be able to carry that attitude with me to my next airline, cause guess what? The same ****** that is happening at 9E is happening or has happened at every major airline. The company may be able to take away pay or vacation or travel benefits or whatever, but if you come to work and do a good job and take some pride in your flying, they can never take that away.
The Shawshank Redemption - Institutionalized - YouTube
#29
Since you bring it up, what's the deal with you guys and burning gas in the pad? I've had to DH on several PCL flights where we pushed back the sat doing a runup for 20 minutes. Why are you always pushing overweight? I've flown 200/700/900 and never had this problem. Is it something weird in your op specs? Can you not defuel?
#30
Wait......so it was standard practice to T/O knowing you would land overweight? And you actually did land overweight in a non emergency? So you knowingly exceeded limitations?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM