Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Question for Endeavor pilots

Old 04-08-2014 | 02:38 PM
  #31  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

The forums are for *****ing, taking it out on the passengers, or at work is uncalled for. The passengers are innocent, and don't deserve to be treated poorly. Some might think the passengers are getting a steal on flying, and should pay more, but that isn't the fault of the passengers. We are the ones who sell tickets below cost.
Reply
Old 04-08-2014 | 02:42 PM
  #32  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by cartean
Wait......so it was standard practice to T/O knowing you would land overweight? And you actually did land overweight in a non emergency? So you knowingly exceeded limitations?
We can't have our Weight data report issued planning to be overweight (it's a centrally generated datalink), however if it looks like we'll be a bit overweight for landing, the FAA now prefers we just land and write it up instead of doing crazy manuevering and dragging the plane around going into busy airports. So, yes.. an emergency declaration is not required.
Reply
Old 04-08-2014 | 02:50 PM
  #33  
cartean's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
We can't have our Weight data report issued planning to be overweight (it's a centrally generated datalink), however if it looks like we'll be a bit overweight for landing, the FAA now prefers we just land and write it up instead of doing crazy manuevering and dragging the plane around going into busy airports. So, yes.. an emergency declaration is not required.
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that is actually a reg.

this explanation you gave is much different than how I read/interpreted your first post on the topic. I am now on the same page. I originally read it as, we gonna be too heavy to land, oh well let's just go anyway.
Reply
Old 04-08-2014 | 06:49 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Default

The reg is FAR 121.195 and it's clear you can't take off with more fuel than what will bring you under max landing weight considering planned fuel burn.
Reply
Old 04-09-2014 | 12:41 AM
  #35  
tsquare's Avatar
Thread Starter
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cartean
Wait......so it was standard practice to T/O knowing you would land overweight? And you actually did land overweight in a non emergency? So you knowingly exceeded limitations?
That's not what he said.
Reply
Old 04-09-2014 | 03:44 AM
  #36  
cartean's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
That's not what he said.

Yeah, after he clarified I admitted to interpreting his post wrong.
Reply
Old 04-09-2014 | 05:09 AM
  #37  
tsquare's Avatar
Thread Starter
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cartean
Yeah, after he clarified I admitted to interpreting his post wrong.
Yeah.. sorry.. missed that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices