1 Flight Attendant
|
Originally Posted by Meow1215
(Post 3118919)
The 200 is a bad penny that keeps turning up. It’s cheap, it’s paid for, it’s plentifully available. It’s not going anywhere.
Under the current scope, the 200 can't go away as long as DL wants as much flying as possible to be done by regionals. |
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 3119072)
Scope scope scope scope scope scope scope.
Under the current scope, the 200 can't go away as long as DL wants as much flying as possible to be done by regionals. |
Originally Posted by Meow1215
(Post 3119245)
Technically the 50 seat market won’t go away due to scope. But why just the 200 with another 50 seat option?
|
Originally Posted by preflight
(Post 3119329)
GoJet is flying the crap out of their 550s, a 50 seat two-class 700...
|
Man. 2020 just keeps on giving doesn't it. Anyone who flew this morning knows what I'm talking about.
|
Originally Posted by preflight
(Post 3119329)
GoJet is flying the crap out of their 550s, a 50 seat two-class 700...
|
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 3119072)
Scope scope scope scope scope scope scope.
Under the current scope, the 200 can't go away as long as DL wants as much flying as possible to be done by regionals. |
Originally Posted by KelvinHelmholtz
(Post 3119525)
According to this DCI should be flying the maximum allowed 50 seat RJs (125). They are not, and there are no plans to fly the max 125 according to DG
|
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 3119838)
I may be wrong, but I believe the last narrowbody deal reduced the number of 200s DCI could fly. Is that 125 the new reduced number?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands