I think he was being sarcastic but I'm not sure...

There's so many trolls these days you forget who is trolling who.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I troll the trolls...not you. Lol..sometimes my trolling does a loop and I get caught in my own crossfire! Otherwise, I'm just a sarcastic s.o.b.

Alright, it's cool. Like I said, I was just confused. Carry on.

So if envoy was planning on sending 25 a month and American came out of left field with this 90 a month then nothing perhaps envoy would just allow 45 guys to flow in one month. Why not? They obviously planned on 360 to flow this year and planned our hiring according to their expectations. I expect envoy to do the right thing and allow 45 of our guys to flow

^^^ I sincerely can't tell if you're joking.

LOLZ... filler


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hahaha...you're funny

The real question is this, are our elected reps pulling fingernails trying to make this happen or are they rolling over and showing their belly. If they're bending over now then you can all expect an unexpected slow down twice a year once in the summer and once in the holidays. What's stopping them.

If you contacted them they could give you an answer.

I spoke with my rep, and he said they're working on it. Part of the union's stance (aside from the fact that flowing more people would keep to keep projections on target) is the optics of flowing more than the metered minimum. It's good for recruiting and would also make mgmt look like they throw us a bone every once in awhile. It would be a win-win in a situation we don't have any control over (AA stopping classes).

He didn't say if the company is receptive to the idea or not, but the union is trying.