![]() |
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2422782)
I spoke with my rep, and he said they're working on it. Part of the union's stance (aside from the fact that flowing more people would keep to keep projections on target) is the optics of flowing more than the metered minimum. It's good for recruiting and would also make mgmt look like they throw us a bone every once in awhile. It would be a win-win in a situation we don't have any control over (AA stopping classes).
He didn't say if the company is receptive to the idea or not, but the union is trying. |
Originally Posted by HardLemonade
(Post 2422836)
Hey Dawg...did you ask your rep about anything else? Like this very cryptic, upcoming Reserve overhaul? I would ask my own reps but I don't know who they are. I don't think we even have a CA rep in DFW currently.
|
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2422782)
I spoke with my rep, and he said they're working on it. Part of the union's stance (aside from the fact that flowing more people would keep to keep projections on target) is the optics of flowing more than the metered minimum. It's good for recruiting and would also make mgmt look like they throw us a bone every once in awhile. It would be a win-win in a situation we don't have any control over (AA stopping classes).
He didn't say if the company is receptive to the idea or not, but the union is trying. |
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2422842)
He said we'd see something about RSV in the next 2-3 weeks but couldn't give details. It will be voted on by the pilot group after road shows. Sorry I don't have anything else.
|
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 2422782)
I spoke with my rep, and he said they're working on it. Part of the union's stance (aside from the fact that flowing more people would keep to keep projections on target) is the optics of flowing more than the metered minimum. It's good for recruiting and would also make mgmt look like they throw us a bone every once in awhile. It would be a win-win in a situation we don't have any control over (AA stopping classes).
He didn't say if the company is receptive to the idea or not, but the union is trying. |
Where's cr700 or dacuj on this?
|
Originally Posted by Bigpimppilot
(Post 2423007)
Where's cr700 or dacuj on this?
They metered flow in early 2016 when we had over 100 reserves in each of a few different statuses (they said the metering was due to future theoretical staffing levels). If they metered then, it seems like they'll always meter. |
Originally Posted by ORDinary
(Post 2423271)
Well dacuj is banned but would just say we'll flow 500 next year to make up for it, and cr700 would tell us we are a bunch of whiners.
They metered flow in early 2016 when we had over 100 reserves in each of a few different statuses (they said the metering was due to future theoretical staffing levels). If they metered then, it seems like they'll always meter. |
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2423397)
They metered the flow when we offered zero time lines.
|
From an AA thread:
"SEP 5 (38 Pilots) NOV 7 (44 Pilots) NOV 28 (44 Pilots) No October or December classes." That would likely mean we flow 19 in Sept, 25 in Nov, 44 total remaining for the year. I believe that would make the 2017 total 263. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands