11 Year Flow
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Envoy was my first 121 job a few years back. After 6 months I left for Endeavor as I felt that I was sold a lie regarding the 5.5 year flow which was advertised at the time. I believe the advertising has revised to 6 years today. However I am still in contact with 2 from my new hire class and they said the latest flows are from May 2007. Which is a little over 11 years. I believe the flow is a gimmick and can't figure out how they are able to sell it at 6 years when people flowing are from 11 years ago.
#22
Say if there are 300 flowing per year, but there were only 100 hired for a year, flow would improve.
Indeed, just a few years ago there were CAs with Envoy that had 25 years since DOH. If you used their amount of years as years to flow today, it would be laughable.
Hope this clears up the confusion. (Your premise would be right if the same number were new hires each year. But it is not.)
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 147
You literally made an account to come over here as though we give a ****/haven’t heard this before. Maybe you’re just upset you left?
As plenty of people said, you can’t assume future flow times based on those flowing today. There is a lot more at play.
And why do people on the outside assume its flow or nothing for us? Everyone is keeping their apps updated and plenty of people are getting hired at AA outside the flow with only a few years at MQ
As plenty of people said, you can’t assume future flow times based on those flowing today. There is a lot more at play.
And why do people on the outside assume its flow or nothing for us? Everyone is keeping their apps updated and plenty of people are getting hired at AA outside the flow with only a few years at MQ
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 272
I feel like I see this all too often on APC. The current "industry leaders" in terms of contract love sitting on their high horse talking about how great their company is and how could you ever be at any other company. Give it a rest guys. A few years ago, no one cared about Endeavor. Twenty years ago, no one cared about Delta. It's all cyclical.
One day your company, whichever it may be, will take a turn for the worst and be at the bottom of the barrel. I just hope that if/when I end up at an "industry leading" place, for however long it enjoys the top ranks, I'm not piiissing on anyone else.
One day your company, whichever it may be, will take a turn for the worst and be at the bottom of the barrel. I just hope that if/when I end up at an "industry leading" place, for however long it enjoys the top ranks, I'm not piiissing on anyone else.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
I feel like I see this all too often on APC. The current "industry leaders" in terms of contract love sitting on their high horse talking about how great their company is and how could you ever be at any other company. Give it a rest guys. A few years ago, no one cared about Endeavor. Twenty years ago, no one cared about Delta. It's all cyclical.
One day your company, whichever it may be, will take a turn for the worst and be at the bottom of the barrel. I just hope that if/when I end up at an "industry leading" place, for however long it enjoys the top ranks, I'm not piiissing on anyone else.
One day your company, whichever it may be, will take a turn for the worst and be at the bottom of the barrel. I just hope that if/when I end up at an "industry leading" place, for however long it enjoys the top ranks, I'm not piiissing on anyone else.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
I know of one going to swa in a couple months. Another one interviewing shortly.
#30
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 79
119 ytd, 11 last month, 6 were FO's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post