Envoy EOW 175
06-11-2019, 06:58 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,656
While I dont know "why" we are getting them that way, I am fairly certain we will never fly them in that opspec. The training, procedures, not to mention the changing of manuals and not being able to use them for Canadian flying all point to this being a non-event.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
06-11-2019, 07:10 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Originally Posted by Cyio
While I dont know "why" we are getting them that way, I am fairly certain we will never fly them in that opspec. The training, procedures, not to mention the changing of manuals and not being able to use them for Canadian flying all point to this being a non-event.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
06-11-2019, 07:31 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,656
Originally Posted by bigtime209
If this is really happening, it's not a big deal to implement it. The training should be a non event. At Republic, they just have some extra slides in their CBTs about it. Don't have to jump in the pool. And if they aren't retrofitting the other planes, they'll use those for the Canada flying.
At the end of the day it doesn’t really matter and I guess the plan will surface eventually. I could be totally wrong, I will give you that.
06-11-2019, 08:29 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
279MQ is on property. Don’t know if that is equipped or not, and unsure of the reason for the change in the registration format.
06-11-2019, 08:37 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: ERJ Right
Posts: 541
Originally Posted by CrowneVic
279MQ is on property. Don’t know if that is equipped or not, and unsure of the reason for the change in the registration format.
-Keep the dirty side down
06-11-2019, 08:43 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
My point was, were are supposed getting aircraft with certain equipment added to the aircraft, it has to be in the aom for there location, what they are, what they for.
Its required by faa, even if we are not flying eow.
Just like the added antennas to some aircraft, nothing in the aom.
Backward bufoons.
Its required by faa, even if we are not flying eow.
Just like the added antennas to some aircraft, nothing in the aom.
Backward bufoons.
06-11-2019, 09:00 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 217
We need to make sure new hires know that pilots of the E175 get paid more for flying these aircraft at Envoy. Just check out the pay scales for the “large RJ” / small widebody! Also, each time you fly an aircraft equipped with a life raft, you earn a $20 override on top of your already higher hourly rate. Not to mention they actually have first class seating so the tips are going to be even better on these planes. Who needs a raise when we can use these awesome EOW 175s as a recruiting tool?!
06-11-2019, 09:46 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Pipers!
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by Cyio
While I dont know "why" we are getting them that way, I am fairly certain we will never fly them in that opspec. The training, procedures, not to mention the changing of manuals and not being able to use them for Canadian flying all point to this being a non-event.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
Maybe we are flying them until Republic can staff them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
