Envoy AA4125 Slides off ORD Runway Video
11-13-2019, 12:49 PM
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 546
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
Because the construction workers need jobs in Chicago.
Give them a few years and they will be tearing up and building again.
Give them a few years and they will be tearing up and building again.
A million years ago, when they started moving towards the parallel runway scheme, there was an informational pamphlet they put out.
They said they’d looked at historical data and found an average of some low number of days (10-15 I think) that had sustained Xwinds that exceeded most A/C limitations. It sounded suspicious, but they claimed to have numbers.
11-13-2019, 01:00 PM
#103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Originally Posted by But seriously
Sarcasm aside...
A million years ago, when they started moving towards the parallel runway scheme, there was an informational pamphlet they put out.
They said they’d looked at historical data and found an average of some low number of days (10-15 I think) that had sustained Xwinds that exceeded most A/C limitations. It sounded suspicious, but they claimed to have numbers.
A million years ago, when they started moving towards the parallel runway scheme, there was an informational pamphlet they put out.
They said they’d looked at historical data and found an average of some low number of days (10-15 I think) that had sustained Xwinds that exceeded most A/C limitations. It sounded suspicious, but they claimed to have numbers.
11-13-2019, 02:45 PM
#106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Originally Posted by DownInPetaluma
It’s jet flying in general.
https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/...rdia_USA,_2015
11-13-2019, 03:24 PM
#107
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by Excargodog
Quote:
Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Are you saying the left turn was unintentional? It wasn’t a high speed exit?
And yet they collapsed their RIGHT gear in the dirt, but not the LEFT? When they departed the runway to the left?
Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Are you saying the left turn was unintentional? It wasn’t a high speed exit?
And yet they collapsed their RIGHT gear in the dirt, but not the LEFT? When they departed the runway to the left?
Bodies in motion and all that.
11-13-2019, 05:01 PM
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by But seriously
Sarcasm aside...
A million years ago, when they started moving towards the parallel runway scheme, there was an informational pamphlet they put out.
They said they’d looked at historical data and found an average of some low number of days (10-15 I think) that had sustained Xwinds that exceeded most A/C limitations. It sounded suspicious, but they claimed to have numbers.
A million years ago, when they started moving towards the parallel runway scheme, there was an informational pamphlet they put out.
They said they’d looked at historical data and found an average of some low number of days (10-15 I think) that had sustained Xwinds that exceeded most A/C limitations. It sounded suspicious, but they claimed to have numbers.
11-13-2019, 07:13 PM
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Originally Posted by CousinEddie
Does the 145 FM directly address reverse thrust usage when the airplane starts weathervaning on a contaminated / slippery runway?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
