Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Envoy Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/envoy-airlines/)
-   -   CSLOA (12 months) (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/envoy-airlines/128869-csloa-12-months.html)

6ix9ineYearFlow 04-07-2020 07:31 PM

CSLOA (12 months)
 
Anyone actually taking it?

NoValueAviator 04-08-2020 06:11 AM

Why would anyone do 12 when 1 is getting approved and co. can call you in with 1 month notice anyway?

CLE to IAH 04-08-2020 06:13 AM


Originally Posted by NoValueAviator (Post 3026917)
Why would anyone do 12 when 1 is getting approved and co. can call you in with 1 month notice anyway?

I don’t guess I understand your logic here. If company can call you back in 1 month, why not take the 12 and they’ll call you when it’s time to come back?

NoValueAviator 04-08-2020 06:35 AM


Originally Posted by CLE to IAH (Post 3026920)
I don’t guess I understand your logic here. If company can call you back in 1 month, why not take the 12 and they’ll call you when it’s time to come back?

Are you Dallas based? With the 1 month leave, YOU can call THEM and say you're coming back. With the 12 month leave, you are not guaranteed any more than 30 days, but lose the ability to recall yourself.

CLE to IAH 04-08-2020 06:38 AM


Originally Posted by NoValueAviator (Post 3026940)
Are you Dallas based? With the 1 month leave, YOU can call THEM and say you're coming back. With the 12 month leave, you are not guaranteed any more than 30 days, but lose the ability to recall yourself.

no I’m LGA.

ViperCrosswind 04-08-2020 12:47 PM

Has anyone heard back on this? Did they acknowledge your application or approve your request?

teamflyer 04-08-2020 12:54 PM

Do you think they will offer another leave if things don’t improve come summer time?

But seriously 04-08-2020 01:37 PM

Isn’t the deadline for all these leaves April 10th?

UnprotectdPilot 04-08-2020 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by teamflyer (Post 3027279)
Do you think they will offer another leave if things don’t improve come summer time?

That's what some of the ALPA reps seem to think based off of company communications. This is merely a first round of offerings to see what kind of interest they can generate.

Tomhawker 04-08-2020 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by UnprotectdPilot (Post 3027396)
That's what some of the ALPA reps seem to think based off of company communications. This is merely a first round of offerings to see what kind of interest they can generate.

Then they need to communicate that to the pilots so that those interested can make an informed decision as to whether to take this offer or wait for a better one. I don’t see the union being proactive in helping us make these decisions.

martyByrde 04-08-2020 06:52 PM


Originally Posted by Tomhawker (Post 3027486)
Then they need to communicate that to the pilots so that those interested can make an informed decision as to whether to take this offer or wait for a better one. I don’t see the union being proactive in helping us make these decisions.

The purpose of the MEC ratifying the LOA was to put the decision in YOUR hands, “because it doesn’t cost us anything.”

teamflyer 04-09-2020 07:55 PM

If not many take the leave. Then i suspect they will furlough or offer another leave. If they furlough, will they furlough ppl on leave first or go by seniority

havick206 04-09-2020 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by teamflyer (Post 3028446)
If not many take the leave. Then i suspect they will furlough or offer another leave. If they furlough, will they furlough ppl on leave first or go by seniority

And you’re basing this on what info exactly?

Tyrion 04-09-2020 11:47 PM

Unless there is a huge reversal in passenger travel over the summer, or another bailout tied to protecting jobs, there will be furloughs coming in October. If they happen, it will be in reverse seniority order regardless of LOA status.

buddies8 04-10-2020 04:51 AM

Furlough is from bottom to top.

havick206 04-10-2020 05:35 AM

My bad misread the original post, there wasn’t a question mark so didn’t realize it was a question and not a statement.

Furlough bottom to top as others have pointed out.

martyByrde 04-11-2020 10:31 AM

Less than 10% took some form of leave. I’m guessing we didn’t have enough takers

Cyio 04-11-2020 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by martyByrde (Post 3029855)
Less than 10% took some form of leave. I’m guessing we didn’t have enough takers

Obviously not. Only downside though was we lost two weeks or more trying to game the system instead of just rejecting it outright.

Oh well. Fingers crossed something more livable comes across the table so each time I fly home I am not worried about infecting my family.

dera 04-11-2020 10:51 AM

Much higher participation than expected.
Time to see if this was enough for them.

dera 04-11-2020 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by Cyio (Post 3029867)
Oh well. Fingers crossed something more livable comes across the table so each time I fly home I am not worried about infecting my family.

Don't squeeze your fingers too hard. And definitely don't hold your breath.

Cyio 04-11-2020 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by dera (Post 3029873)
Much higher participation than expected.
Time to see if this was enough for them.

If this is the case and they got enough, I suppose it will at least have the benefit of easier line bidding/trading. My guess is this is heavily tilted to the senior folks and the fresh out of school folks. Ones that have enough already and ones that haven't started families and can afford the pay gap.

Like I said, is what it is at this point.

Cyio 04-11-2020 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by dera (Post 3029873)
Much higher participation than expected.
Time to see if this was enough for them.

I wonder what the number would need to be in order to have enough savings? I mean, I feel like it would need to be above 50% of the pilot group based off of how many flight cancelations/reductions they keep telling us about.

Keep hearing of 90% reductions to summer flying on a lot of routes so keeping 1000 pilots around still seems like a lot.

buddies8 04-11-2020 11:28 AM

Is it to late to apply for the leave.:rolleyes:

Cyio 04-11-2020 01:13 PM


Originally Posted by buddies8 (Post 3029901)
Is it to late to apply for the leave.:rolleyes:

lol yes. Closed yesterday at 5pm

But seriously 04-11-2020 01:26 PM


Originally Posted by Cyio (Post 3029888)
I wonder what the number would need to be in order to have enough savings? I mean, I feel like it would need to be above 50% of the pilot group based off of how many flight cancelations/reductions they keep telling us about.

Keep hearing of 90% reductions to summer flying on a lot of routes so keeping 1000 pilots around still seems like a lot.


Enough savings for what? They aren’t going to keep pilots on because they can “afford to”. No matter what RW writes in his emails, furloughs and cost savings are independent of each other. If there is demand to fly airplanes, they’ll keep pilots on board. If there is no demand, they’ll furlough. Paycuts and/or temporary leaves won’t affect that. They won’t furlough someone in Oct if they think they’ll need them back in May. They also won’t stay intentionally overstaffed for 2 years just because we make it a little cheaper.

For now, I think they are just trying to survive the Summer. They’ll try and assess long term demand trends after all the “shelter in place” stuff is lifted.

Cyio 04-11-2020 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by But seriously (Post 3029978)
Enough savings for what? They aren’t going to keep pilots on because they can “afford to”. No matter what RW writes in his emails, furloughs and cost savings are independent of each other. If there is demand to fly airplanes, they’ll keep pilots on board. If there is no demand, they’ll furlough. Paycuts and/or temporary leaves won’t affect that. They won’t furlough someone in Oct if they think they’ll need them back in May. They also won’t stay intentionally overstaffed for 2 years just because we make it a little cheaper.

For now, I think they are just trying to survive the Summer. They’ll try and assess long term demand trends after all the “shelter in place” stuff is lifted.

I'm sorry, but you kind of bounced all over the place with this statement and the way I read it, contradict yourself. We all get they are trying to survive the summer, there isnt any issue with that. What I was referring too was why pay 1500 pilots 72 hours a month when the staffing only requires 750 pilots. Would be better to pay the other 750 50 hours to sit at home. My question was I wonder what number becomes the break even point and if they have reached that with this 19 hour deal.

But seriously 04-11-2020 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by Cyio (Post 3030011)
I'm sorry, but you kind of bounced all over the place with this statement and the way I read it, contradict yourself. We all get they are trying to survive the summer, there isnt any issue with that. What I was referring too was why pay 1500 pilots 72 hours a month when the staffing only requires 750 pilots. Would be better to pay the other 750 50 hours to sit at home. My question was I wonder what number becomes the break even point and if they have reached that with this 19 hour deal.


Yeah, I probably was unclear. I may have misunderstood you as well.

From the company point of view, it makes sense to get as many pilots on leave as possible.

From a pilot point of view, I don’t think we are helping avoid furloughs by taking leaves. If the leave works for you personally, I’m all for it, but I don’t believe that these short term leaves will have any effect when the decision comes on whether to furlough or not.

CLE to IAH 04-11-2020 03:37 PM


Originally Posted by But seriously (Post 3030041)
Yeah, I probably was unclear. I may have misunderstood you as well.

From the company point of view, it makes sense to get as many pilots on leave as possible.

From a pilot point of view, I don’t think we are helping avoid furloughs by taking leaves. If the leave works for you personally, I’m all for it, but I don’t believe that these short term leaves will have any effect when the decision comes on whether to furlough or not.

I would assume the ability to fly on leave makes a difference. I’m one of those people who isn’t smart enough to do anything else. I’m a trained button pusher :-)

ViperCrosswind 04-11-2020 04:52 PM

The company said it was targeted at military folks.

Most guard units are begging for full time workers. None of our part timers are allowed on base right now and all the governors are eyeing the guard (which is their right) as disaster relief if their state gets hit.

i hope enough of us took it to take care of those with limited options. We’re in this together, and I look forward to flying with you all again!

BigZ 04-11-2020 07:16 PM


Originally Posted by ViperCrosswind (Post 3030088)
The company said it was targeted at military folks.

Most guard units are begging for full time workers. None of our part timers are allowed on base right now and all the governors are eyeing the guard (which is their right) as disaster relief if their state gets hit.

i hope enough of us took it to take care of those with limited options. We’re in this together, and I look forward to flying with you all again!

Yeah, I saw you punched out for a while.
Have fun, dude.

Chato 04-12-2020 07:38 AM

ok im 100% biddin a line for May. :p

dera 04-12-2020 09:27 AM

The early christmas present is out :)

NoValueAviator 04-12-2020 09:52 AM

Looks like part time lines crediting 72 hours lmao.

I feel bad for anyone who took the LOA.

Tomhawker 04-12-2020 10:08 AM

Next question, can the LOA be legally refused?

Chato 04-12-2020 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by NoValueAviator (Post 3030472)
Looks like part time lines crediting 72 hours lmao.

I feel bad for anyone who took the LOA.

they pulled a Qt again haha

Gooch 04-12-2020 10:29 AM

They’re just helping you pad your accounts before furloughs start. 30hr blocks but paying 72 isn’t sustainable long term. Good luck to all.

rld1k 04-12-2020 10:52 AM


Originally Posted by Gooch (Post 3030495)
They’re just helping you pad your accounts before furloughs start. 30hr blocks but paying 72 isn’t sustainable long term. Good luck to all.

Yeah because that's what mgt at envoy looks out for, your financial well-being

NoValueAviator 04-12-2020 11:00 AM

Waiting for the MEC take. I don't know how it can be real.

Cyio 04-12-2020 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by NoValueAviator (Post 3030510)
Waiting for the MEC take. I don't know how it can be real.

The MEC approved part time lines for May already. What would be the problem?

buddies8 04-12-2020 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by Tomhawker (Post 3030484)
Next question, can the LOA be legally refused?

what after you've accepted and been approved, check the wording. I'm going with nope you asked and you got it until leave is up.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands