![]() |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3091102)
Why has no-one complained about this then?
|
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 3091030)
This may be an unpopular opinion, but paying for quick trade is bull ****. Why do we have to pay 60$ per year to a guy who apparently has been bragging pre COVID about how his wife never has to work again because of QT. I think we should be focusing on getting the company to do this through CCI. CCI is the official company app, not QT. That’s in the contract. Also, pretty sure QT does cost the company money. Probably not a lot, but for ever server login there is a per user per login cost. Had AA still owned Sabre, perhaps this wouldn’t be an issue.
I used to use QT religiously and now I could care less if it comes back, and I won’t need to pay for anything. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3091249)
I know several who have said they submitted crew cares. GSO was one. They sent a single cab for 2 crews. They came back for the second crew, but not before they waited 30+ minutes.
|
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3091249)
I know several who have said they submitted crew cares. GSO was one. They sent a single cab for 2 crews. They came back for the second crew, but not before they waited 30+ minutes.
|
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3091267)
Anytime a hotel has told me that it’s going to be more than 20 mins, I’ve just told them I’m getting my own cab. 90% of the time the hotel pays it. The CPO has always covered the other 10%. I try not to be unreasonable. If their van is 2 minutes away, I’m not making a fuss. I’ve never had a CPO under any regime question my reimbursement.
|
Originally Posted by SomePilotDude
(Post 3091349)
The problem with all that was a blanket HI6 denying all reimbursement unless we have it approved via CPO or in the case of hotels, scheduling. By the time we wait the 15 and then deal with scheduling it’s 30 minutes and someone finally shows up.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3091379)
HI6 does not take precedent over the contract.
get your cab, submit for reimbursement, and if it doesn’t get paid then submit a contract dispute in DTS. The clincher here is to make sure you have good evidence for DTS ie screen shots of when you arrived curbside with a date/time stamp, and screenshot when you called for a cab after 15 mins with your call logs showing you made attempt to contact the hotel curbside. Where disputes fall over is lack of good evidence. |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 3091385)
^^^^ This. Neither does the company arbitrarily changing FM1.
get your cab, submit for reimbursement, and if it doesn’t get paid then submit a contract dispute in DTS. The clincher here is to make sure you have good evidence for DTS ie screen shots of when you arrived curbside with a date/time stamp, and screenshot when you called for a cab after 15 mins with your call logs showing you made attempt to contact the hotel curbside. Where disputes fall over is lack of good evidence. |
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3090743)
What section are QT and QB in? MH and the boys at QT have made millions off of pilots and flight attendants who are too lazy to use DECS. The past few months have proven that we could quickly learn to program PF keys and live without QT.
Make sure you ask the CPO for a paper copy of the bid so that you can figure out what you are going to do. Don't write on it though, there's only one copy. |
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3091260)
this may be an unpopular opinion but you’re jealous at mh. Why do you care if his wife has to work or not? Good for him, too bad you probably can’t do that with your wife. If you’re really concerned about saving the company’s dime, you should probably be taking an unpaid leave of absence.
Well this was a weird comment, yikes... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands