![]() |
Flow Negotiations
Why isn’t alpa pushing hard for a faster flow to make up for years with no flow! They have renegotiated before. Time to bump up the rate since most will be off the street soon.
|
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3201871)
Why isn’t alpa pushing hard for a faster flow to make up for years with no flow! They have renegotiated before. Time to bump up the rate since most will be off the street soon.
|
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3201871)
Why isn’t alpa pushing hard for a faster flow to make up for years with no flow! They have renegotiated before. Time to bump up the rate since most will be off the street soon.
|
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3201871)
Why isn’t alpa pushing hard for a faster flow to make up for years with no flow! They have renegotiated before. Time to bump up the rate since most will be off the street soon.
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3201877)
Uhhh, maybe because with guys already at AA facing FURLOUGHS, it’s a pretty steep hill to climb right now. Before AA starts hiring through the flow, they’d actually have to be hiring...
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3201935)
yeah, not a chance. According to thekooj AA wants Envoy to grow. There is no chance they increase flow to make up anything when hiring starts back up. They do not want to decimate their growing Regional network. As a matter of fact, as AA hiring increases expect the percentage of Flow pilots in each class to decrease.
I diverge, the idea that AA may come looking for concessions or renegotiations, or if APA pushes hard against any talk of scope relaxing, the flow formula could be retweaked. We need to remember that formula was designed when AA needed lots of pilots but didn't want to decimate their regional feed. I dont think we are anywhere near that level of hiring so who knows. |
Right give up more money for a maybe flow.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 3202014)
Right give up more money for a maybe flow.
|
Do you all not realize now is the time to negotiate flow while it has little or no value? Once it does they will want more.
|
Originally Posted by rld1k
(Post 3202068)
Do you all not realize now is the time to negotiate flow while it has little or no value? Once it does they will want more.
|
Originally Posted by rld1k
(Post 3202068)
Do you all not realize now is the time to negotiate flow while it has little or no value? Once it does they will want more.
|
With the turn of events the past year, I am not willing to give up my seniority to go to AA only to get furloughed, no way Jose!
I think ALPA should make The Voy a sweet place to stay for the majority of us that can call Envoy home until retirement, just my 2 cents. |
Originally Posted by shinydiscoballs
(Post 3202326)
With the turn of events the past year, I am not willing to give up my seniority to go to AA only to get furloughed, no way Jose!
I think ALPA should make The Voy a sweet place to stay for the majority of us that can call Envoy home until retirement, just my 2 cents. |
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3202063)
then just to clarify to you, we get nothing without giving up something.
|
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 3202526)
See slurpee machines in crew rooms? Me neither.
|
When do you guys think AA will hire again? Serious question.
|
Originally Posted by FAIPMAFIA
(Post 3204486)
When do you guys think AA will hire again? Serious question.
|
Originally Posted by FAIPMAFIA
(Post 3204486)
When do you guys think AA will hire again? Serious question.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3204553)
Thought it had already been said by AA that early 2022 was the target
|
Originally Posted by uavking
(Post 3204497)
DL is said to spool up pilot selection late Q4 '21/early Q1 '22. That's in order to compensate for early outs and projected Summer '22 flying. I would guess that AA will have to hire around the same time due to the sheer momentum of upcoming retirements.
|
Originally Posted by AeroEnvoy
(Post 3204585)
Only problem is they still have to retrain all the furloughed pilots through long term. It could be a few years before they’re in a position to hire.
|
Originally Posted by Santaslilhelper
(Post 3204803)
From what I understand it’s not a full long term. I could be wrong though.
|
Originally Posted by Santaslilhelper
(Post 3204803)
From what I understand it’s not a full long term. I could be wrong though.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3204831)
I would venture to guess that all of them will be going through long term. Half didn’t finish training, a large portion was based in NYC, and they are recalled based on what is needed and they’ll have to re-bid for aircraft like new hires.
Some of the furloughs from AA would be from the E190 so they’ll obviously need long term on something else. Hopefully a lot of the furloughees from the 73 and ‘bus were already on the plane they wanted. I don’t honestly know how the recall works in their contract. Does anyone know if the pilots get to pick their new aircraft or if the company assigns it? Assuming they are offering both NB aircraft. |
Originally Posted by EagleVol
(Post 3204825)
It would only be a full long term if changing equipment, otherwise it’s about a 5 day training footprint.
|
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3204841)
The post this was answering was a question about AA furloughs, not ENY. You are probably correct about ENY.
Some of the furloughs from AA would be from the E190 so they’ll obviously need long term on something else. Hopefully a lot of the furloughees from the 73 and ‘bus were already on the plane they wanted. I don’t honestly know how the recall works in their contract. Does anyone know if the pilots get to pick their new aircraft or if the company assigns it? Assuming they are offering both NB aircraft. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 3204850)
This seems to be what I have heard as well. How long it will take to get through 1800 or so pilots is anyones guess, I was thinking 18 months, with 100 a month going in. Obviously COVID could speed up or delay that as could efficiency at AA's training department.
5 days is not much morethan a recurrent cycle. They already do at least 15000 of those a year. Adding 1800 shouldn’t be too hard. |
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3204888)
If the majority of the events are really just 5 days, I’m sure they can do it faster than that if they want to. The “if they want to” is an important caveat.
5 days is not much morethan a recurrent cycle. They already do at least 15000 of those a year. Adding 1800 shouldn’t be too hard. Ultimately, like you said, it will come down to how quickly they feel the need to have them back. I don’t think they will need all 1800 back right away. |
So would you say hiring won’t start back up till summer of 2022?
|
Originally Posted by EagleVol
(Post 3204825)
It would only be a full long term if changing equipment, otherwise it’s about a 5 day training footprint.
it will be a fustercluck for the first year or two. |
Originally Posted by FAIPMAFIA
(Post 3204947)
So would you say hiring won’t start back up till summer of 2022?
The point of mentioning DL is that AA has all of that as well as substantially more projected (pre-Rona, so some adjustment via early outs) retirements over the next 5-10 years. Will AA go into 2022 a smaller airline that it was in Q1 2020? Yes, but so will DL and UA. Just to maintain that smaller airline in the face of retirements, AA will have to hire. In order to fly the summer '22 schedule, grab market share, and eventually return to its previous size as the industry recovers, AA will have to hire. Take all that for what it's worth, but I also wouldn't give into the apocalyptic doom and gloom. |
Originally Posted by uavking
(Post 3204961)
I stick with my guess of Q1 '22. Upthread I mentioned the rumors around DL hiring as early as Q4 this year. While DL didn't officially furlough, they had a large number of early outs, a very large number of people sitting UNA (unassigned) for awhile, and some new hires who never made it through the initial cycle. This is in addition to fleet retirements and base closures that shuffled alot of bodies.
The point of mentioning DL is that AA has all of that as well as substantially more projected (pre-Rona, so some adjustment via early outs) retirements over the next 5-10 years. Will AA go into 2022 a smaller airline that it was in Q1 2020? Yes, but so will DL and UA. Just to maintain that smaller airline in the face of retirements, AA will have to hire. In order to fly the summer '22 schedule, grab market share, and eventually return to its previous size as the industry recovers, AA will have to hire. Take all that for what it's worth, but I also wouldn't give into the apocalyptic doom and gloom. I truly hope they recover quickly, lots of amazing pilots working for them that need it to happen. |
Originally Posted by uavking
(Post 3204961)
I stick with my guess of Q1 '22. Upthread I mentioned the rumors around DL hiring as early as Q4 this year. While DL didn't officially furlough, they had a large number of early outs, a very large number of people sitting UNA (unassigned) for awhile, and some new hires who never made it through the initial cycle. This is in addition to fleet retirements and base closures that shuffled alot of bodies.
The point of mentioning DL is that AA has all of that as well as substantially more projected (pre-Rona, so some adjustment via early outs) retirements over the next 5-10 years. Will AA go into 2022 a smaller airline that it was in Q1 2020? Yes, but so will DL and UA. Just to maintain that smaller airline in the face of retirements, AA will have to hire. In order to fly the summer '22 schedule, grab market share, and eventually return to its previous size as the industry recovers, AA will have to hire. Take all that for what it's worth, but I also wouldn't give into the apocalyptic doom and gloom. |
Originally Posted by FAIPMAFIA
(Post 3204984)
You make very good points. AA will have to hire in 2022 but my guess is it won’t be what we saw prior to COVID. For those who got hire prior to the fall of 2016 I say you can add another 1 to 2 years to their flow time.
But an extra 1 year? We're already at the extra year with mainline pilots still out that need to be pulled back in and trained before we get to hiring/flowing. |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3205028)
Addition to flow? I think we're talking about an extra 2 years at minimum. Perhaps 3 years. I don't think it's longer than that though.
But an extra 1 year? We're already at the extra year with mainline pilots still out that need to be pulled back in and trained before we get to hiring/flowing. |
Originally Posted by FAIPMAFIA
(Post 3205035)
Yea my bad. I mean on top of this already.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3205051)
Gotcha. Sorry, I might be a bit trigger happy. What you say makes sense if one considers this past year already gone, which it is.
Haha Naww is all good! This whole thing has got everyone like that. No worries. |
Just read the AA mainline thread where they talk about LOA’s being approved like crack cocaine in the last bid. That’s pretty much sums up the realistic timeframe of AA hiring picking back up.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands