![]() |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1891507)
That I did and it only took 12 years despite the promise of 2. May you do a whole lot better, but so far all I see is the same old sell with no concrete commitments. New hires should have it way better than us. They are seeing DAL, UAL and AA hiring 2000-3000 pilots a year combined. That number will go up even higher 4-5 years from now. Where all we saw was basically zero to a trickle for.. years. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1891524)
...and yet knowing that you STILL refuse to accept that a MULTITUDE of situations from terrorism, to global economics, to politics, to energy, to capacity reductions and the scheduling and furlough recall issues internal to AA ALL could (and to some degree WILL) likely negatively impact the "6-year" projection (again, look up the definition of that term). On top of that NONE of what so far HAS occurred CAN occur without Envoy hiring a MINIMUM 50 pilots each and every month from here on out and pilots which by the way simply DON'T EXIST in the pipeline.
Come on, man...........get real. All this hinges on virtually EVERYTHING going right from here on out and that's a fool's assumption. I'm just curious as to how Cujo went from "ALPA facilitating careers elsewhere" to "This is the greatest regional and we will all be AA pilots". Envoy management clearly made a threat against the union to cease the "abandon ship" maneuver or else. Cujo caved and he is now the biggest cheerleader Pedro has. For anyone considering Envoy look at the actual facts, not a hopeful projection based off ideal circumstances. Envoy is not likely to get the amount of new hires required to cover flow movement over the given time frame, who will flow? The 824 and likely the most senior protected pilots (of which I'm fairly certain is none other than Cujo himself). Look at motivations. Cujo has been threatened by the company and desperately needs the flow to work at least to his seniority level as he is in his late 40s and likely doesn't have any other options. The regional landscape will change drastically over the next decade, I'm not sure if it will lead to flow agreements, benefit increases, or something not thought of yet. What I do know is that Cujo has led people down this rabbit hole before as "Mason32" and he clearly has ulterior motives. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1891524)
...and yet knowing that you STILL refuse to accept that a MULTITUDE of situations from terrorism, to global economics, to politics, to energy, to capacity reductions and the scheduling and furlough recall issues internal to AA ALL could (and to some degree WILL) likely negatively impact the "6-year" projection (again, look up the definition of that term). On top of that NONE of what so far HAS occurred CAN occur without Envoy hiring a MINIMUM 50 pilots each and every month from here on out and pilots which by the way simply DON'T EXIST in the pipeline.
Come on, man...........get real. All this hinges on virtually EVERYTHING going right from here on out and that's a fool's assumption. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1891263)
I think non-Envoy pilots would be smart not to bite at this latest carrot just yet (and if any airline has a history of cultivating enticing carrots to pilots over the last 19 years, it's this one). Again, so far ALL that has occurred regarding the future is PROMISES. Here's some facts;
Envoy has flowed X pilots to AA for the combination of two reasons. First, AA has been hiring (more modestly as of late though) and second, Envoy has been legally REQUIRED to flow the number of pilots it has over the last two years or so as part of the 824 grievance award. If AA is hiring (they are), Envoy management has NO choice to move these pilots to AA. HOWEVER..........once those 824 have flowed (500 or so to go), it becomes more of a contractual flow (the "protected pilots") and then the requirements can be altered or possibly even voided at some point in the future due to any number of scenarios including, but not limited to merger or even liquidation of Envoy. . It does include protection in the event of a merger. Have you read the documents? |
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 1891532)
The biggest flaw. Is it's not 1 list.. Problem solved.. Make it simple
Not surprisingly, some are planning on buying things with checks that not only might bounce, but that haven't even arrived in the mail, only the promise that it IS in the mail. Pilots.........what'ya gonna do ? |
Originally Posted by Bzzt
(Post 1891537)
The new hire issue you speak of is absolutely the weak link of this chain. There simply aren't enough prospective pilots to cover 50 new hires a month for 6 years to get that most junior guy hired today a seat at AA.
I'm just curious as to how Cujo went from "ALPA facilitating careers elsewhere" to "This is the greatest regional and we will all be AA pilots". Envoy management clearly made a threat against the union to cease the "abandon ship" maneuver or else. Cujo caved and he is now the biggest cheerleader Pedro has. For anyone considering Envoy look at the actual facts, not a hopeful projection based off ideal circumstances. Envoy is not likely to get the amount of new hires required to cover flow movement over the given time frame, who will flow? The 824 and likely the most senior protected pilots (of which I'm fairly certain is none other than Cujo himself). Look at motivations. Cujo has been threatened by the company and desperately needs the flow to work at least to his seniority level as he is in his late 40s and likely doesn't have any other options. The regional landscape will change drastically over the next decade, I'm not sure if it will lead to flow agreements, benefit increases, or something not thought of yet. What I do know is that Cujo has led people down this rabbit hole before as "Mason32" and he clearly has ulterior motives. Id be more concerned about the reps they aren't trying to intimidate. When was the last time a training center rep got targeted? |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1891547)
The flow after the 824 is not predicated upon ever having been a captain. We could shrink this airline right down to 40 E75's and it wouldn't change the fact that retirement based hiring at AA sends every single one of our guys over in under 6 years. Stopping the shrinking just means upgrades and better QOL for all.
Id be more concerned about the reps they aren't trying to intimidate. When was the last time a training center rep got targeted? |
1 Attachment(s)
This is the actual flow language in case anyone wants to read facts.
|
Originally Posted by RyanP
(Post 1891542)
The protected pilots flow is not just a contractual thing they can throw out or modify because they feel like it. It is a legal grievance settlement agreement in case 0411/Transfer of assets.
It does include protection in the event of a merger. Have you read the documents? If there is one thing your union past, present and certainly future has proven is that with the correct threat (that doesn't even have to exist like your pseudo-1113 during AMR's chapter 11 ;)), they'll not only agree to just about anything, they'll bust their humps to convince you to as well. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1891547)
The flow after the 824 is not predicated upon ever having been a captain. We could shrink this airline right down to 40 E75's and it wouldn't change the fact that retirement based hiring at AA sends every single one of our guys over in under 6 years. Stopping the shrinking just means upgrades and better QOL for all.
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1891547)
Id be more concerned about the reps they aren't trying to intimidate. When was the last time a training center rep got targeted?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands