Envoy's future
04-10-2014 | 09:05 AM
#12
Banned
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Is there a specific reason or two as to why Envoy wouldn't seek additional flying?
04-10-2014 | 09:08 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
I don't think a wholly owned would win a contract with a different major anyway. It wouldn't really make sense for United to pay American to do flying. I also don't think we could staff additional aircraft even if we got them.
04-10-2014 | 09:10 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
No. It's yet another reason how management continues to lie to get their way. Like how the previous poster explained, how management needed a certain cost structure during bankruptcy to seek additional flying and now they claim there is no such initiative.
04-10-2014 | 09:13 AM
#15
On Reserve
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 1
From: Guppy Captain
Valid points... But did we submit an RFP to fly the jets that RAH is flying for AAG? How about the Expressjet flying in DFW? What about the SkWest flying in LAX, or even the recent takeover of aircraft in ORD from Chautauqua? Nope, not even one. It doesn't seem to me like we are seeking any additional flying AT ALL!
04-10-2014 | 11:01 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: CFIT cannot be logged as a landing?!
Whose -200 in the new colors did I see trolling around ORD a few days ago?
04-11-2014 | 04:45 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
From: 1st year pay for the 3rd time
Reminds me of the van driver who became VP of Flight ops for Comair. 3 years from now Envoy will meet a similar fate with this guy at the helm. I've moved up 140 spots since January. But the bottom is still getting closer to me. When they make the 175 announcement then you'll really see attrition.
04-11-2014 | 07:07 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
