Envoy newhires to E-175
03-16-2016 | 01:04 PM
#61
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
If this other MAJOR announcement is anything about getting 175s from another company then I will not be happy. The use of shinny jets to attract new hires is a huge negative for me. Using endeavor like bonuses to attract new hires is what I'm hoping for. As well as some much needed QOL improvements for the contract.
It will definitely be interesting to watch.
03-16-2016 | 01:20 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Don't shoot the messenger, man! I agree...full base is what they need to do. But you guessed right what the .5 was.
Give it time. They can't send us back to MIA full boar so soon after removing us from it. That is business 101 unfortunately. They made two mistakes. First, closing down envoy's MIA base. Second, having Republic be the airline that moved in.
They realized that mistake pretty much from the get go if it makes you feel better. But a basic principle of business is you don't reverse a decision too quickly, even if it seems like it was the wrong one. You give it some time so that variables are worked out.
My personal opinion is that MIA will be a full base sooner rather than later. The other news will be something you will like...and satellite bases will pale in comparison.
Give it time. They can't send us back to MIA full boar so soon after removing us from it. That is business 101 unfortunately. They made two mistakes. First, closing down envoy's MIA base. Second, having Republic be the airline that moved in.
They realized that mistake pretty much from the get go if it makes you feel better. But a basic principle of business is you don't reverse a decision too quickly, even if it seems like it was the wrong one. You give it some time so that variables are worked out.
My personal opinion is that MIA will be a full base sooner rather than later. The other news will be something you will like...and satellite bases will pale in comparison.
03-16-2016 | 01:23 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Most of us could care less. However I think if you held out on the FO bonuses, something better would of had to come. I could be wrong though as the end result of PSA and PDT turning down the FO bonuses has yet to be seen. At least our unions are talking again.
03-16-2016 | 02:11 PM
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
I'm not gonna lie, this peaked my interest simply because I want to be DFW based and they told me they would hire me directly into the 175 in DFW. I don't want to be commuting when I go 121. If they end up making MIA the new base for new hires on the 175 then I'll look elsewhere.
03-16-2016 | 02:14 PM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Feito no Brasil, CA
03-16-2016 | 02:20 PM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
I'm not gonna lie, this peaked my interest simply because I want to be DFW based and they told me they would hire me directly into the 175 in DFW. I don't want to be commuting when I go 121. If they end up making MIA the new base for new hires on the 175 then I'll look elsewhere.
03-16-2016 | 02:20 PM
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
I'm not gonna lie, this peaked my interest simply because I want to be DFW based and they told me they would hire me directly into the 175 in DFW. I don't want to be commuting when I go 121. If they end up making MIA the new base for new hires on the 175 then I'll look elsewhere.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
