Is ExpressJet that bad?
#201
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
I don’t think that United wants a bunch of tired 50 seat jets. They’re simply stuck with them because they’re maxed out on scope. The Max starts operating in 2 weeks. They’re 161 on the way and each one can replace the available seats of 3.5 rj’s. The pilots can be had for the cost of an interview. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
#202
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Probably a neutral thing. Definitely not bad. It is less likely 145’s are going away since United owns them. United will have to sit a paid off asset and that is hard to do if you can staff them. (Just look at American’s history with its paid off MD80’s).
I believe good things are coming for XJT pilots flying for United Express. United has heated up hiring and United is running new hire classes this summer for the first time in years. Summer is a time when they would prefer the instructors fly the line. Anyway, more new United hires means more pilots through CPP.
I believe good things are coming for XJT pilots flying for United Express. United has heated up hiring and United is running new hire classes this summer for the first time in years. Summer is a time when they would prefer the instructors fly the line. Anyway, more new United hires means more pilots through CPP.
#203
With 23 going in June, it's probably 60+ pilots moving on to United from now through October based on the current class dates. It'll be nice to see some movement, but placing those CRJs will be essential or we will be right back where we are now with stagnation.
#204
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Meat in the seat
It’s a bad thing to have no assets, just as it would be for individuals that desire a future !!!
A company with no assets or profits is not a company I would consider to have a stable future !
It’s simple Econ 101 folks.
A company with no assets or profits is not a company I would consider to have a stable future !
It’s simple Econ 101 folks.
#205
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Meat in the seat
With the non union, cost efficient side

Exjet will always be too expensive and never be profitable.
Wishing for a positive outcome is foolish.
Vote with your feet girls and boys !!!
#206
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
I tend to agree. I think the CRJ’s are already placed with SKW on the American side. No need to paint them.
#207
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
#208
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
#209
I brought them 2 last month. I just thought they were getting painted. Until the SKW rep came up and said "We'll take it from here boys". Didn't say a single word after that. Definitely a sign of things to come. Wouldn't hold my breath on anything at XJT.
#210
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
There are too many false hopes on this board. Let’s get back to reality. The lifers are feeding into eachother. As long as skyw and CommutAir keep growing, there’s no reason to keep XJT alive. Nothing like a good old longevity reset.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



