Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Is ExpressJet that bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2018 | 01:53 PM
  #201  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
I don’t think that United wants a bunch of tired 50 seat jets. They’re simply stuck with them because they’re maxed out on scope. The Max starts operating in 2 weeks. They’re 161 on the way and each one can replace the available seats of 3.5 rj’s. The pilots can be had for the cost of an interview. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
Depends on the operating cost versus revenue on each leg. There are two methods, cost per available seat mile (CASM)/RASM, and cost/leg. If the former were always best you would have 777's operating on every leg, but it's not. A 777 with 40 seats filled will lose money while an ERJ with 40 seats filled will probably make money. Same with smaller airplanes. At a certain point, it does make sense to go with the bigger airplane- that's why DAL regularly flys 777s between ATL-ORF (or used to). But sometimes it makes sense to go with a smaller airplane. Of course, oil costs will play a factor. Only 5 years ago the 50 seats were dead, now they are coming out of the desert as fast as they can be manned. End of the year? Who knows.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 03:24 PM
  #202  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Arliss
Cool yo. Is it a good thing or bad thing or neutral thing?
Probably a neutral thing. Definitely not bad. It is less likely 145’s are going away since United owns them. United will have to sit a paid off asset and that is hard to do if you can staff them. (Just look at American’s history with its paid off MD80’s).

I believe good things are coming for XJT pilots flying for United Express. United has heated up hiring and United is running new hire classes this summer for the first time in years. Summer is a time when they would prefer the instructors fly the line. Anyway, more new United hires means more pilots through CPP.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 03:50 PM
  #203  
PontiusPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Reverse Cowgirl
Default

With 23 going in June, it's probably 60+ pilots moving on to United from now through October based on the current class dates. It'll be nice to see some movement, but placing those CRJs will be essential or we will be right back where we are now with stagnation.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 04:54 PM
  #204  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Meat in the seat
Default

Originally Posted by Arliss
Cool yo. Is it a good thing or bad thing or neutral thing?
It’s a bad thing to have no assets, just as it would be for individuals that desire a future !!!
A company with no assets or profits is not a company I would consider to have a stable future !
It’s simple Econ 101 folks.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 05:08 PM
  #205  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Meat in the seat
Default

Originally Posted by PontiusPilot
With 23 going in June, it's probably 60+ pilots moving on to United from now through October based on the current class dates. It'll be nice to see some movement, but placing those CRJs will be essential or we will be right back where we are now with stagnation.
They’ll place those aircraft alright, . . .
With the non union, cost efficient side
Exjet will always be too expensive and never be profitable.
Wishing for a positive outcome is foolish.
Vote with your feet girls and boys !!!
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 05:59 PM
  #206  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Baddog
They’ll place those aircraft alright, . . .
With the non union, cost efficient side
Exjet will always be too expensive and never be profitable.
Wishing for a positive outcome is foolish.
Vote with your feet girls and boys !!!
I tend to agree. I think the CRJ’s are already placed with SKW on the American side. No need to paint them.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 06:26 PM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
I tend to agree. I think the CRJ’s are already placed with SKW on the American side. No need to paint them.
I think the next few weeks will be key. If there’s no announcement about CRJs being placed with UAL then we know we are being strung along.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 07:07 PM
  #208  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk
I think the next few weeks will be key. If there’s no announcement about CRJs being placed with UAL then we know we are being strung along.
DL ASA aircraft are already on OO opspecs and at ROW to get painted in AA colors....
Reply
Old 05-23-2018 | 04:57 AM
  #209  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
DL ASA aircraft are already on OO opspecs and at ROW to get painted in AA colors....
I brought them 2 last month. I just thought they were getting painted. Until the SKW rep came up and said "We'll take it from here boys". Didn't say a single word after that. Definitely a sign of things to come. Wouldn't hold my breath on anything at XJT.
Reply
Old 05-23-2018 | 06:32 AM
  #210  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
Default

There are too many false hopes on this board. Let’s get back to reality. The lifers are feeding into eachother. As long as skyw and CommutAir keep growing, there’s no reason to keep XJT alive. Nothing like a good old longevity reset.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrxsteve
Pilot Health
3
06-29-2017 07:15 PM
JohnLocke
Regional
13
01-29-2014 05:19 AM
beechking
Republic Airways
170
06-08-2013 06:07 AM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
skypine27
Cargo
2
08-07-2007 03:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices