![]() |
Furloughing / terminating crew trackers right before summer is definitely not a good sign. And the fact that the union will be bending over to allow CA's to pickup FO trips, versus drawing a hard line and getting FO's paid more to attract and retain. The end is near.
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2568318)
Furloughing / terminating crew trackers right before summer is definitely not a good sign. And the fact that the union will be bending over to allow CA's to pickup FO trips, versus drawing a hard line and getting FO's paid more to attract and retain. The end is near.
|
Originally Posted by SkipperBaloo
(Post 2568332)
Whoever bought us has crew trackers already :D
|
Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
(Post 2568318)
Furloughing / terminating crew trackers right before summer is definitely not a good sign. And the fact that the union will be bending over to allow CA's to pickup FO trips, versus drawing a hard line and getting FO's paid more to attract and retain. The end is near.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2568830)
I just can’t see it being “the end”. There is no regional that can pick up the flying being done. I suspect it is streamlining of resources, possibly outsourcing more functions to corporate.
1. They can’t staff the flying that they have signed contracts to fly. 2. United buys additional mainline planes to replace those seats. Neither has happened or will happen overnight. Even if United were to buy new planes it will take years to get them. I don’t see ExpressJet getting any large rj’s, but I don’t see them completely going away as long as there are 50 seat jets running around. Scope is maxed out and even if United added another fleet type it would only allow around 65 more big rj’s. Even if they all went to express the number of pilot seats would be slashed over what is present now. My guess is that those planes will be spread out between the companies already flying them. I don’t see ExpressJet having a bright future when the 50 seat jets are parked, but until then I see the worse case being shrinking considerably but surviving. If I was there I’d be looking to get out, and if I was applying to the regionals I’d go somewhere with big rj’s and your best guess of a quick upgrade. Being that United changes it’s mind on a daily basis, what actually happens is anyone’s guess. |
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 2568983)
Basically 2 things will shut down ExpressJet.
1. They can’t staff the flying that they have signed contracts to fly. 2. United buys additional mainline planes to replace those seats. Neither has happened or will happen overnight. Even if United were to buy new planes it will take years to get them. I don’t see ExpressJet getting any large rj’s, but I don’t see them completely going away as long as there are 50 seat jets running around. Scope is maxed out and even if United added another fleet type it would only allow around 65 more big rj’s. Even if they all went to express the number of pilot seats would be slashed over what is present now. My guess is that those planes will be spread out between the companies already flying them. I don’t see ExpressJet having a bright future when the 50 seat jets are parked, but until then I see the worse case being shrinking considerably but surviving. If I was there I’d be looking to get out, and if I was applying to the regionals I’d go somewhere with big rj’s and your best guess of a quick upgrade. Being that United changes it’s mind on a daily basis, what actually happens is anyone’s guess. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2568830)
I just can’t see it being “the end”. There is no regional that can pick up the flying being done. I suspect it is streamlining of resources, possibly outsourcing more functions to corporate.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2568830)
I just can’t see it being “the end”. There is no regional that can pick up the flying being done. I suspect it is streamlining of resources, possibly outsourcing more functions to corporate.
|
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2566839)
Travel benefits?
What? The only benefit nowadays is getting to say “I was bumped off flights for 6 hours and got to stay an extra night at the Red Roof. It was great!” Non rev benfits are a total ripoff-especially for connection carriers. |
Originally Posted by Blackhawk
(Post 2569179)
Ahh, it hasn't been that bad for me. Of course I avoid ATL- the place where nonrevs go to die. Also I don't try to take a family of 7 to Paris over the summer. But being flexible I've gone all over the world with my kids. Heck, one time trying to get home from CVG couldn't get on a flight. Looked at what was available... what the heck? CDG was wide open, business class. Went to Paris, bummed around for a day. Flew home, business class again. "Seriously honey, the only way I could get home was to go to Paris."
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands